• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Techradar: Leaked Red Dead sequel map is real, takes place before Redemption

cute-nice-gif-143.gif

140668-impressive-very-nice-gif-Imgur-jRdr.gif


Can't fucking wait man, AHHGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

This is going to be so fucking good man, or at least I hope so.
Hopefully they didn't need the Benz to fight the Darkness!
 

SDCowboy

Member
Prequel? Hope its not called RDR then, and should technically have nothing to do with Red Dead Redemption itself

You do realize Redemption wasn't the first in the series, right? There was also Revolution. Thus the "RDR".

edit: revolver rather. Not revolution.
 
What about a The Revernant / Last of the Mohicans type story? Succeed were Assassins Creed 3 failed!

This is what I would like. A real frontier styled game involving Native Americans and exploring their culture and the real Wilderness out West but have it in an area there are some town you could get to as well.

Its one thing that worries me about this potentially being set in the Deep South. Its probably not going to be that type of experience.
 

Anarckhy

Neo Member
If this surely is an prequel, I hope we play as an cowboy/indian/white just like how they perfected GTAV's multiple protagonist system. Surely do hope John has an cameo in the story too. Like him popping up in a mission asking for help or just having a good ol' gang fight with other outlaws.
 

SDCowboy

Member
If this surely is an prequel, I hope we play as an cowboy/indian/white just like how they perfected GTAV's multiple protagonist system. Surely do hope John has an cameo in the story too. Like him popping up in a mission asking for help or just having a good ol' gang fight with other outlaws.

Could be cool. I still prefer one protagonist, though.
 

SDCowboy

Member
I think it would also be neat if maybe you played as a half white, half Native American protagonist so you had a cowboy/indian, between two worlds type deal.
 

dolabla

Member
If true, this will easily be the most excited I've been for a game this gen. Here's to hoping we hear something about it at E3. Maybe at Sony's conference.
 
Could be cool. I still prefer one protagonist, though.
I'm the opposite, I'd have a hard time going back to having only one protagonist to play as in a Rockstar game. I thought it was amazingly well done and would even find myself playing differently depending on who I was due to their different personalities.
 
whatever it is that they've been working on for 6 years now (wtf?!), it's bound to be mind-shatteringly amazing.

for some reason i've never believed there'd be another Red Dead, i've been thinking the studio is making something totally different. i hope this is legit and that i'm wrong!
 

SDCowboy

Member
I'm the opposite, I'd have a hard time going back to having only one protagonist to play as in a Rockstar game. I thought it was amazingly well done and would even find myself playing differently depending on who I was due to their different personalities.

I just don't like when right when I start getting sucked into one protagonist's story, I get ripped away to another protagonist. I like sticking with one protagonist, personally. I'm sure it will be amazing either way though.
 
I am willing to buy the Super Deluxe Limited Edition right now. Literally right now. I don't need a trailer, or art or even a synopsis. Just give me a release date and take my money.

RDR is a system seller.
 
Why? What happened in Red Dead? What happened historically then?

Red Dead doesn't really see an end to the West though it's a major theme in the game, but by the close of that game you're in the early-to-mid 1910s, probably around 1913 or 1914 (going by the historical marker of the Mexican revolution), which was really the end of the "wild west." In real history, the oil boom, the invention of the automobile, the spread of wealth in the US, New Mexico and Arizona being admitted as states, and the onset of World War 1 brought an end to the period of the 'wild' American west.

RDR dealt with the "end of the wild west," and so if they want to stick with the same wild west theme, it's good to go back in time.

I was hoping that they'd explore the northern migration that went along the cattle route, and the growth of organized crime that started out of Chicago as the cattle center of the world. But just as happy for them to go back in time.
 
As long as they have the posse option in free roam I am sold. RDR had the best free roam multiplayer expierence ever. The Map looks amazing though
 

FelipeMGM

Member
I wonder if we would get the game this year, they prob dont want to put Mafia III and a new RDR too close to each other

I am willing to buy the Super Deluxe Limited Edition right now. Literally right now. I don't need a trailer, or art or even a synopsis. Just give me a release date and take my money.

RDR is a system seller.

Take that PS4 money and make the new RDR a Vita exclusive Adam Boyes!!
 

MCN

Banned
why would you even want that?? already decided an unannounced console will be the only you'll own or what

Because I think the games industry is healthier when all 3 platform holders are successful, and Nintendo need to garner third-party support to achieve this.

Getting Rockstar on board would be a major, MAJOR step for them.
 
Take this with a grain of salt too...

I have a good friend that is a stuntman living in NYC. Has done work on Daredevil season 2 and Blindspot. He told me he met a guy who said he has been doing some mo-cap work for the game. Also confirmed that the game takes place before RDR and that he was doing mo-cap for a character who is half-Indian half-white. Never stated if he was the main character/characters or not though.

I'm sure we will hear about this game sometime this summer.

Know who's half-indian, half-white?

This guy right here

4171865-8027493095-Red_D.jpg


oh I'd be so fucking down for a straight up Revolver sequel
 

SDCowboy

Member
Where does guys that called Mideron a liar. HA.

Anyways, you know.....I don't like prequels. Why not just play Marstons son or w/e.

Because then it wouldn't be a western anymore. There are so many more western themes and settings that could be had if the game went back further to the peak of the wild west.
 

Coffinhal

Member
Not convinced by the prequel idea if it's still around Marston's story, or his gang's. They need to be just a small cameo. Even if you have 3 heroes, you can't have one of them being in Marston's gang or whatever.

If this is the full map, well it's not that big compared to RDR. Even with the small Mexican portion (the prologue?). Twice or less than twice that big.

Like we discussed with someone the leak thread, something talking about the civil war and slavery (à la Django Unchained) would have been the perfect setting.

The next Red Dead game was always going to be a prequel. Redemption was all about the end of the Wild West.

If it's a different universe (with no Marston etc.) then it's not a prequel at all.
 

Coffinhal

Member
Maybe it just means a prequel in the sense that it just takes place earlier in the same universe. It doesn't have to involve Marston.

He thinks if you go back in time (from 1911 to 1900, 1890, 1880 etc.) then it's "always going" to be a prequel. It's only a prequel if it's the same universe. And the same universe means that it is a prequel where John Marston was born, live and died, along with his gang, all his friends. But if you get rid of him and everything that was set in RDR (2010), including locations, but set the game before 1911, then it's not a prequel, it's just another game of another universe set before 1911. So no, it's not always going to be a prequel. Words have a meaning.

I mean it sounded like you played Red Dead Redemption before, but now it's like uhhh

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_(genre)#Subgenres

Contemporary Western

Also known as Neo-Westerns, these films have contemporary American settings, and they utilize Old West themes and motifs (a rebellious anti-hero, open plains and desert landscapes, and gunfights). For the most part, they still take place in the American West and reveal the progression of the Old West mentality into the late 20th and early 21st centuries. This subgenre often features Old West-type characters struggling with displacement in a "civilized" world that rejects their outdated brand of justice.

uhhh
 

SDCowboy

Member
He thinks if you go back in time (from 1911 to 1900, 1890, 1880 etc.) then it's "always going" to be a prequel. It's only a prequel if it's the same universe. And the same universe means that it is a prequel where John Marston was born, live and died, along with his gang, all his friends. But if you get rid of him and everything that was set in RDR (2010), including locations, but set the game before 1911, then it's not a prequel, it's just another game of another universe set before 1911. So no, it's not always going to be a prequel. Words have a meaning.
It can be a prequel, in the same universe, without Marston being in it or being the main character. As I just mention, the game could revolve around, say, Ricketts, and the game would still be a prequel.
 

antitrop

Member
He thinks if you go back in time (from 1911 to 1900, 1890, 1880 etc.) then it's "always going" to be a prequel. It's only a prequel if it's the same universe. And the same universe means that it is a prequel where John Marston was born, live and died, along with his gang, all his friends. But if you get rid of him and everything that was set in RDR (2010), including locations, but set the game before 1911, then it's not a prequel, it's just another game of another universe set before 1911. So no, it's not always going to be a prequel. Words have a meaning.
ok
 

pvpness

Member
Day 1. RDR was great, but RDR really attached me to the series. I hope pc version is day and date with the consoles.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
I read an article about Native American tribes keeping African American slaves in the deep south USA. Some tribes followed tradition and incorporated the slaves into the tribe as family while others were assimilated by Europeans and practiced segregation and considered Africans as a slave race. The traditional tribe went around freeing all slaves, bolstering their numbers and the U.S. grew scared. There was a lot of tension between the different tribes as well as with the Europeans. It seems like a very interesting setting for a Red Dead since we're losing Mexico. Instead of the two countries being USA and Mexico, they can be USA and a Native American Nation.

What about a The Revernant / Last of the Mohicans type story? Succeed were Assassins Creed 3 failed!
That's what I wanted. Hateful 8/Revenant setting in the prairies/Midwest.
 
Top Bottom