Kenzodielocke
Banned
Red Dead Revengeance.
Prequel? Hope its not called RDR then, and should technically have nothing to do with Red Dead Redemption itself
What about a The Revernant / Last of the Mohicans type story? Succeed were Assassins Creed 3 failed!
Why would they do that with the success they had with GTAV.
You do realize it wasnt called Revolution but Revolver, right?You do realize Redemption wasn't the first in the series, right? There was also Revolution. Thus the "RDR".
You do realize it wasnt called Revolution but Revolver, right?
If this surely is an prequel, I hope we play as an cowboy/indian/white just like how they perfected GTAV's multiple protagonist system. Surely do hope John has an cameo in the story too. Like him popping up in a mission asking for help or just having a good ol' gang fight with other outlaws.
This just makes me want to explore the world of RDR one last time.
I'm the opposite, I'd have a hard time going back to having only one protagonist to play as in a Rockstar game. I thought it was amazingly well done and would even find myself playing differently depending on who I was due to their different personalities.Could be cool. I still prefer one protagonist, though.
I'm the opposite, I'd have a hard time going back to having only one protagonist to play as in a Rockstar game. I thought it was amazingly well done and would even find myself playing differently depending on who I was due to their different personalities.
That distinct period of the rough and tumble "lawless west" was dead at that point, hell that was a big part of Red Dead.Why? What happened in Red Dead? What happened historically then?
I am willing to buy the Super Deluxe Limited Edition right now. Literally right now. I don't need a trailer, or art or even a synopsis. Just give me a release date and take my money.
Why? What happened in Red Dead? What happened historically then?
I am willing to buy the Super Deluxe Limited Edition right now. Literally right now. I don't need a trailer, or art or even a synopsis. Just give me a release date and take my money.
RDR is a system seller.
why would you even want that?? already decided an unannounced console will be the only you'll own or what
Take this with a grain of salt too...
I have a good friend that is a stuntman living in NYC. Has done work on Daredevil season 2 and Blindspot. He told me he met a guy who said he has been doing some mo-cap work for the game. Also confirmed that the game takes place before RDR and that he was doing mo-cap for a character who is half-Indian half-white. Never stated if he was the main character/characters or not though.
I'm sure we will hear about this game sometime this summer.
Where does guys that called Mideron a liar. HA.
Anyways, you know.....I don't like prequels. Why not just play Marstons son or w/e.
The next Red Dead game was always going to be a prequel. Redemption was all about the end of the Wild West.
It'd be a Western just a more contemporary Western.Because then it wouldn't be a western anymore.
If it's a different universe (with no Marston etc.) then it's not a prequel at all.
It'd be a Western just a more contemporary Western.
Maybe it just means a prequel in the sense that it just takes place earlier in the same universe. It doesn't have to involve Marston.
I mean it sounded like you played Red Dead Redemption before, but now it's like uhhh
Contemporary Western
Also known as Neo-Westerns, these films have contemporary American settings, and they utilize Old West themes and motifs (a rebellious anti-hero, open plains and desert landscapes, and gunfights). For the most part, they still take place in the American West and reveal the progression of the Old West mentality into the late 20th and early 21st centuries. This subgenre often features Old West-type characters struggling with displacement in a "civilized" world that rejects their outdated brand of justice.
It can be a prequel, in the same universe, without Marston being in it or being the main character. As I just mention, the game could revolve around, say, Ricketts, and the game would still be a prequel.He thinks if you go back in time (from 1911 to 1900, 1890, 1880 etc.) then it's "always going" to be a prequel. It's only a prequel if it's the same universe. And the same universe means that it is a prequel where John Marston was born, live and died, along with his gang, all his friends. But if you get rid of him and everything that was set in RDR (2010), including locations, but set the game before 1911, then it's not a prequel, it's just another game of another universe set before 1911. So no, it's not always going to be a prequel. Words have a meaning.
okHe thinks if you go back in time (from 1911 to 1900, 1890, 1880 etc.) then it's "always going" to be a prequel. It's only a prequel if it's the same universe. And the same universe means that it is a prequel where John Marston was born, live and died, along with his gang, all his friends. But if you get rid of him and everything that was set in RDR (2010), including locations, but set the game before 1911, then it's not a prequel, it's just another game of another universe set before 1911. So no, it's not always going to be a prequel. Words have a meaning.
That's what I wanted. Hateful 8/Revenant setting in the prairies/Midwest.What about a The Revernant / Last of the Mohicans type story? Succeed were Assassins Creed 3 failed!