• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

RUMOR: NX more powerful than PS4, Splatoon/Mario Maker ports in development

Status
Not open for further replies.

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
NX is so powerful, you won't believe how powerful it is. 10k will make Nintendo great again. By setting up expectations so great that no console in the world could satisfy them.
 
The more I hear the more I keep thinking that the dummy controller will be the actual NX and the "home console" will be the optional SCD.

They can price the dummy controller around 100$ and have every NX game available to it through cloud.

Alternatively, you could get the home console to play the games on your TV with a normal controller.

Stick a powerfull SoC in a comfortably sized screenless controller that can stream to any smart device via a custom app, sell it for $150.
Sell a detatchable, maybe autostereoscopic & low spec tablet that connects the top of the controller for $100. Sell a compatible multimedia hdmi stick that plugs into a tv for $50.
Any of these display receiving devices can be classed as an 'scd' and take care of additional tasks. Nofhing crazy but no cloud required.
 
Benefits of using cartridges:
No need to install; just plug 'n play.
Saves hard drive space with most consoles having to install massive files for games now a days (likely because Disc read speeds aren't fast enough)
Have the cartridges playable on both means you won't overship one version and that singular version would be more valuable (maintaining Its price/sales)
Retailers can feel better about granting Nintendo more shelf space with smaller packaging.
Smaller packaging can also mean lowered shipping costs.
Reduce costs with smaller hard drives. They're less necessary without all the installs.
Save on the disc drive which increases the cost and size of the machine.
Make a smaller device that uses less energy that's less prone to breaking with less moving parts. (Sounds like something Nintendo would value)
Cons:
Potential cost of game issue.
For 3rd parties Nintendo can lower licensing costs to make up for it (but that means less money through licensing...but it might be worth the money they save on everything else)
Sound good? Am I missing anything on either side?
Do you guys think this is the ideal solution?
 
Not getting hyped after Wii U. They have to earn my hype again.

If you read all the rumors on the front page, its impossible not to get hyped...
VDYw509.png


67569357.jpg


Unless you just stop reading any rumors all together until E3...
 

Peru

Member
We've got some believable ballpark rumours telling us the system will at at least be decently powerful.

But the warnings against high expectations for cutting edge results still stand: A) It's unlikely 3rd parties, those who release games at all, are going out of their way to make the NX version all it could be. They'll play it low risk, low effort. B) Several of the Nintendo games are likely to have started out on Wii U and may not take full advantage of the system's power. and C) the original NX games still represent a Nintendo in unfamiliar terrain of cutting edge graphics. AND D) if it's true that handheld and console divisions are all making games for the same system, we're likely to see quite a few more "low-key" games, modest-looking rpgs, puzzle games, etc.

So even if this is PS4-levels, or above PS4, we shouldn't expect cutting edge will be the norm. And I've said before, expecting a launch line-up to give us all the software breadth we want is always unrealistic.
 
On the whole power thing, as long as Nintendo ditches power PC I think it's more likely that it'll be decently speced but don't expect "better performance than Ps4k"
Play it safe and expect sub ps4 performance (devs won't put in as much effort as the ps4 ports especially not the first year)
 

FZZ

Banned
Ideally it's possible. Polaris is very scalable. But nintendo will likely go for lower clock speeds and such, bringing it closer to stock PS4 than a PS4K. But the source said because Sony is stuck with its APU, all they can really do is make it on 14nm and up the clocks some more, but it's feature set won't have GCN 1.2 or 1.3, the PDA, or other benefits of Polaris.

So Nintendo has the potential to do more with NX simply because it has the newest generation of gpu. Whether Nintendo takes advantage of that, is up to them.

Only way PS4K matches those features is if they use a new APU, which would be asinine as that would make it a PS5 and abandon the PS4 completely.

That actually sounds realistic and very possible. Hoping it's true because having a greater feature set would be fantastic for the NX even if it doesn't have the raw power of a PS4k, EAD developers always bring the most out of the hardware they're given. Often times I think they push hardware more than Naughty Dog.

Cautiously optimistic now. Just hoping we get official news on something NX related soon. Maybe Trevelyan will come back for some new leaks as well.

So someone decided to make a fake Twitch Stream. Un-fucking-believable.

https://www.twitch.tv/nintendo_events

This is how it starts.

The fever, the rage, the feeling of powerlessness that turns good men... cruel.
 
Wouldn't cartridges that big be really expensive?
Someone posted that saving money on packaging (since cartridges are smaller than discs) could help them be comparible in costs.
As mentioned in my post, Nintendo could reduce licensing costs to 3rd parties to keep the cost of producing the carts for them smaller.
As for Nintendo, there's a lot of benefits for using carts that would make up for it.
Save costs from the console, get benefits at retail/shipping, etc
 

TheJoRu

Member
NX is so powerful, you won't believe how powerful it is. 10k will make Nintendo great again. By setting up expectations so great that no console in the world could satisfy them.

When you turn on NX, and see the graphics, you will say "wow
, I expected 4K 60 FPS gameplay with HairWorks, MSAA and Ambient Occlusion, but this Mario game is in 720p and doesn't have any AA at all.
"
 
NX is so powerful, you won't believe how powerful it is. 10k will make Nintendo great again. By setting up expectations so great that no console in the world could satisfy them.
10k singlehandedly destroyed Nintendo with his extreme speculation
hope these don't spread too much because either way people will be disappointed instead of pleasantly surprised
 
NX is so powerful, you won't believe how powerful it is. 10k will make Nintendo great again. By setting up expectations so great that no console in the world could satisfy them.

I think we all know your opinion on the matter, and we also know these rumors could end up being completely wrong. It's just fun to get hyped about.
 

Eradicate

Member
From the looks of the initial rumor, it looks like the main reason behind the struggles for the Super Mario Maker & Splatoon ports is to have those games interact with their Wii U counterparts. Since Smash 4 & Zelda U are locked in, does that mean that neither game is planned to interact with their Wii U counterparts? And if so, would this indicate that their NX versions will receive additional features?

They probably won't interact from the look of things. It would be nice if they did! Like you said, they'll probably add new features and things. However, I'm also thinking they won't interact because the lack of an (at least standard/comparable) screen that would make playing these games somewhat different between consoles. (So that no one gets an unintentional advantage.)

10k, I'm sure you have more important things to do, but wondering about the wording, were your sources pretty unanimous in saying these were remasters, or did they call them ports or otherwise? Any idea the actions behind remastering these select titles?

Here's what EA has said publicly about 6 months ago on a conference call with investors:

EgR70i2.png

we0GjTE.png

I'd play games on a Nintendo Fridge! (Great quotes! I remember them.)

Don't think we must count mobile. It's like flash games. The games are mostly cheap, small and mostly made for mainstream.
Touchscreen only isn't the way to play big games.

What if mobile could only play games? It would be a whole different story.


Consoles are here to stay. Think there is just allot more ways to play. Vr is also comming, even hololens.
So you have:

Wiiu
ps4
Xbox1
Steam
3ds
Oculus
Samsung vr
Sony vr
Htc vr
Android
Iphone
Pc
Vita
...

For each gamer there are one of two devices you will own to play games on.

The market is getting too big.

Think ofcourse that 3 consoles for game market is to much. Maybe it was better for Ms to stick with pc, and using it as some kind of xbox option. Instead of making a console, because it does almost the same as ps4.

Peter, you're finally a full Member!

I agree; lots of gaming possibilities. Nintendo is still stating their goal is to make people smile. They are going to be pushing gamification and turning more and more people into regular gamers, whatever their devices (primarily theirs and on mobile), I just know it! Like, as opposed to the Wii making it functionally easier for others to game, it'll be about access to gaming and making gaming part of life.

Lol, you trying to start another rumor thread? honestly i don't know. but i think innovation and presenting a vision of the future of gaming is essential because I feel like right now people don't know and we are coming to a crossroads. Everyone on this board seems to accept that consoles are dying and the market for a dedicated box may not be around in 10 to 15 years. gaming isn't dying though, it's actually growing but in areas like mobile and ftp. so I think if nintendo presents a vision and lays down the groundwork for how people WILL be gaming in 10 to 15 years they would be onto something. But gamepad v2 isn't it and console handheld hybrid frankly isn't it either.

Exactly! Gaming everywhere, with everything, and how to improve life! An extra screen and remote play MAY play into that somehow, depending how they do it, but that's not completely it at all. They've got some sort of strategy, and trying to suss that out is a lot of the fun to me!
 

Malus

Member
I think we all know your opinion on the matter, and we also know these rumors could end up being completely wrong. It's just fun to get hyped about.

While we're on this uncontrollable hype train to hell, spyder_monkey should update the OP to reflect that 10k found another source for that Polaris rumor.
 

Mpl90

Two copies sold? That's not a bomb guys, stop trolling!!!
THE FAKE LIVE STREAM

We're going in uncharted territories, ladies and gentlemen.
 

Vena

Member
I wasn't aware that I was so famous. Or that an opinion can be stated only once. Per day? Per thread? Per life? How does it work?

Opinions are only available at 5:00PM, Monday through Thursdays, and only when provided with a teaspoon. All other opinions are moot.

Except mine, my opinions are available 25/8, all the time and do not subscribe to the arrow-of-time. If you observe my opinion, you collapse it and change its state in all time and in all space and any wrong-or-rightness is all because you just had to come in and read my opinion and collapse the wavefunction. You bastards!

I wish I still had my NX superposition equation, because that's exactly where we are now... haha.
 
If the whole library isn't shared between handheld and console, then the remasters being shared at least would make sense.

They'd at least be of popular titles (no one is really going to go crazy over cross play for Mario Tennis). They'd also serve the same purpose as remasters would on the console, to fill the schedule (similar to how the N64 ports did for the 3DS in its earliest days). On top of that, we have the precedent of the 3DS getting Wii games.
 

Terrell

Member
Someone posted that saving money on packaging (since cartridges are smaller than discs) could help them be comparible in costs.
As mentioned in my post, Nintendo could reduce licensing costs to 3rd parties to keep the cost of producing the carts for them smaller.
As for Nintendo, there's a lot of benefits for using carts that would make up for it.
Save costs from the console, get benefits at retail/shipping, etc

I'm a "someone" now? ;)

This is without mentioning that the reduction in repair costs for the most commonly-broken component on a console can be money accounted for as an estimated savings.

And from Nintendo's end, if they have games running on more than one hardware SKU, their marketing spend drastically reduces and can be spent more efficiently, for even more money that is saved.

Savings like these allow Nintendo to opt to take a shave on royalties and other expenses to get people on board with cartridges again, knowing that the money has been recovered via other avenues.

There are a LOT of monetary savings to be had going back to a cartridge business model for all parties involved, depending on how things are done. Not to mention that in the modern era, cartridges astoundingly look like a more "modern" media solution.
 
I'm a "someone" now? ;)

This is without mentioning that the reduction in repair costs for the most commonly-broken component on a console can be money accounted for as an estimated savings.

And from Nintendo's end, if they have games running on more than one hardware SKU, their marketing spend drastically reduces and can be spent more efficiently, for even more money that is saved.

Savings like these allow Nintendo to opt to take a shave on royalties and other expenses to get people on board with cartridges again, knowing that the money has been recovered via other avenues.

There are a LOT of monetary savings to be had going back to a cartridge business model for all parties involved, depending on how things are done. Not to mention that in the modern era, cartridges astoundingly look like a more "modern" media solution.
Yeah :p

Seems like a lot of good can come from it if they go forward with it
 

Peterc

Member
http://playeressence.com/nintendo-n...ler-gimmick-ps4k-power-luigi-mansion-3-rumor/

nintendo is far far far more effcent than the BLOATED SILLY INDUSTRY sick of seeing neogaffers DEFEND THIS BULLSHIT nintendo needs to use said disc so third partys will come BULLSHIT



Those people(in the comments) are mad on us

Specially the lady "Getagrip". She says that our rumors are wrong and that the device is streaming only to mobile or some gamepad device. She uses metaldev as source.
Maybe she is a bit nuts, or just angry :p
 

Eradicate

Member
Stick a powerfull SoC in a comfortably sized screenless controller that can stream to any smart device via a custom app, sell it for $150.
Sell a detatchable, maybe autostereoscopic & low spec tablet that connects the top of the controller for $100. Sell a compatible multimedia hdmi stick that plugs into a tv for $50.
Any of these display receiving devices can be classed as an 'scd' and take care of additional tasks. Nofhing crazy but no cloud required.

Yes!!! That's how I'm thinking too!

The SCD stuff doesn't have to be anything wild right off the bat. They'll probably want to play with it some first with some little things to test it out. Some weaker tech in sleep mode, given the ability to handle some background things (like OS management or what have you) could still speed up/improve the gaming experience somehow anyways, much less if multiple little things are taking part in this boosting effect!

I want a Nintendo gaming-centric tablet that is autostereoscopic! They have to really compete for pocket space now more than ever in their history. Make it a bit different but useful from a gaming perspective, but with some other tablet-ish functions, and it could be really great.

OK, so let me walk this through logically then, based on all your commentary thus far.

Let's say for the sake of argument that this idea of a glass ceiling on 3rd-party games being substantially low that has been thrown about since the GameCube era has unquestionable merit to it, that there is a downward trend in sales of 3rd-party games that is both unquestionable and impossible to ignore and, as evidenced by how long it has been talked about, not even close to a new phenomenon.

So then... what was it about the Wii U that, up until launch, made all of that data irrelevant? What made 3rd-parties go "y'know, Nintendo might be on to something, this hardware will totally beat back the decline in 3rd-party software interest"? What made them think they were safe to greenlight any 3rd-party software for launch, and in some cases exclusive software that only sells on Nintendo hardware which has a history of not selling 3rd-party software? Clearly, there was a course correction that happened rather rapidly after the launch of the hardware, but if this idea that they'll sell sub-50K units of software on Nintendo consoles has unquestionable merit, why were they even considering games on a Nintendo console in the first place?

This is without even factoring the handheld market into things, which I have left out of the discussion in fairness to your argument and does sell 3rd-party software more than adequately.

Until those questions are properly answered, it leads me to believe that 3rd-parties aren't as invested in this idea as forum-goers are, that there's more to Nintendo's relationships with 3rd-parties that any of us will ever be privy to, that the issues with 3rd-party software are perhaps, maybe, just a TAD more nuanced than most people are willing to admit, considering we're still using a talking point against them that existed 15 years ago, when the industry was an entirely different animal than it is today.

Nintendo can change, 3rd-parties definitely have already, and yet we're still stuck discussing Nintendo like we're still in the middle of the GameCube era. You'll forgive me if I think that there's something not quite right with that.

Yeah, all the stuff with 3rd parties...The environment is just so different anymore. It all changes month by month really. We're not exposed to all the workings going on and can't make a judgment on anything really. Good post! Fully agree with you!

Benefits of using cartridges:
No need to install; just plug 'n play.
Saves hard drive space with most consoles having to install massive files for games now a days (likely because Disc read speeds aren't fast enough)
Have the cartridges playable on both means you won't overship one version and that singular version would be more valuable (maintaining Its price/sales)
Retailers can feel better about granting Nintendo more shelf space with smaller packaging.
Smaller packaging can also mean lowered shipping costs.
Reduce costs with smaller hard drives. They're less necessary without all the installs.
Save on the disc drive which increases the cost and size of the machine.
Make a smaller device that uses less energy that's less prone to breaking with less moving parts. (Sounds like something Nintendo would value)
Cons:
Potential cost of game issue.
For 3rd parties Nintendo can lower licensing costs to make up for it (but that means less money through licensing...but it might be worth the money they save on everything else)
Sound good? Am I missing anything on either side?
Do you guys think this is the ideal solution?

I do! You've got more pros than cons! I certainly think it'd be a great way to go for all those reasons! Will they though? Maybe not, but I think many think that it would!
 

Peterc

Member
Yeah, now it's Konami Conference time! Perfect.

Just wondering, is Konami their first focus still console/handheld games?

I believed that they moved to casino gaming, because they could earn more from it.


Miss castlevania, believe it's gone forever.
 
I know this is Nintendo we're talking about, but it doesn't make sense for NX to not be at least as powerful as PS4. Wii was an anomaly and they fucked up on Wii U in terms of it being more akin to PS3 than PS4. They're unlikely to make that mistake again. Even if 3rd party support isn't stellar initially, they at least have to make sure that ports can happen without too much hassle if sales turn out to be decent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom