"Cyborg-Flash-Arrow 2018"
I'm pretty sure doing stuff like this, ie teasing as if you have insider knowledge without a source or verification, is a bannable offense. You've done it multiple times now.
"Cyborg-Flash-Arrow 2018"
240b moneyhat frm tropicana 3/3
You've picked the weirdest hill to be banned on
Ok ok, fine haha. I'm just thoroughly confused as to what's going on here.
_____
In other news, I just got back from Star Trek and I really don't get why it's bombing? I mean, I get the bad advertising campaign, but I feel like I saw people everywhere saying the "problem" was that it was too much like a ToS episode or something? I never watched the series, but the movie in most ways pretty much felt perfectly in line with the two JJ films, so I'm not really sure what people are saying is so different?
It was boring.
Like Kirk and Spock's revelations are so "mid season TV show" simple. Characters literally sit around and talk at each other. Important shit happened off screen between films. Action scenes were a jumbled mess.
Biggest problem is we're told that the five year mission changed Kirk, but we're not shown it.
That's basically the reason why. Same with Ghostbusters. They both crippled themselves with bad first trailers that no amount of word of mouth was going to save.In other news, I just got back from Star Trek and I really don't get why it's bombing? I mean, I get the bad advertising campaign
I mean, I suppose I can understand the bolded viewpoint, but I don't really get the rest? The movie certainly didn't seem overly talky to me, and I felt like everything was pretty regularly in motion. And that's the specific line I've heard the most - that it's too talky. I just don't really see that, it's not like the large "sit and talk" section of the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy or anything.
But then I'm the weirdo who doesn't understand how Into Darkness is a "remake" of Wrath of Khan, so maybe I just don't get Star Trek the same was everyone else.
That's basically the reason why. Same with Ghostbusters. They both crippled themselves with bad first trailers that no amount of word of mouth was going to save.
I just found it boring.
But I'm not a Star Trek guy. I don't care about discussions of morality, I just want to see a fun film.
Jesus I need to go to bed, thank god we aren't talking wonder woman villains or I would be here all night cracking jokes
"Cyborg-Flash-Arrow 2018"
Yeah, I only heard about this a few days ago.I had no idea Ben Hur was coming out or even being made and I follow movies daily. Weird.
Not only is it coming out, the GOAT videogame was released to promote it the other week on Xbox One. Sneak King am cry.I had no idea Ben Hur was coming out or even being made and I follow movies daily. Weird.
I have no idea what they were expecting from a Ben Hur remake starring the guy from Boardwalk Empire. The guy was actually on Kimmel a couple weeks ago and mentioned how the 10-12 minute chariot race scene took 6 weeks to film, which sounded excessive.
That's about as long as it took to film the chariot sequence in the original.
Aquaman has a better villain gallery than Superman.
If something ever needs a Gawker mocking, it's this.
https://twitter.com/tomgara/status/766068918129655808
They posted a review of Sausage Party, then pulled it down the next day for a reason that must be read to be believed.
I'm making note of that."Predatory Queer Woman" sounds like a great name for a band.
It openned in Pluto and Mars at the same damn time. At the Same Damn Time.Did it open on Mars yet??
Ben Hur and Magnificent Seven a month a part?
What a time to be alive.
I'm sorry but parasite could make for a great survival horror movie. Think the thing, in space. I'm in.Superman has too many goofy villains, if we are talking about things that translate to the big screen. No one wants to see him face Toyman, Parasite or Metallo for $10.
Ben Hur and Magnificent Seven a month a part?
What a time to be alive.
Ben Hur and Magnificent Seven a month a part?
What a time to be alive.
At least Magnificent Seven looks like it could be fun and is doing something a bit different with the concept.
Couple days in a row of it being below Guardians. Wonder how the third weekend will compare.$4.1M for Suicide Squad on Wednesday.
Another poor Wednesday hold from Tuesday. Down 57% today week on week. If Thursday follows the same pattern, it will come in at $3.5M.
Is it true for most films they need to make 2.5x their budget to be profitable when accounting for advertisement and other costs? I recall seeing that here before.
Is it true for most films they need to make 2.5x their budget to be profitable when accounting for advertisement and other costs? I recall seeing that here before.
Couple days in a row of it being below Guardians. Wonder how the third weekend will compare.
I'm sorry but parasite could make for a great survival horror movie. Think the thing, in space. I'm in.
If they got a good writer (No Kurtzman, Orci or Goyer) I would watch that movie.I'd watch a Michael Bay Superman vs Metallo film with Metallo being a ludicrously over the top soldier.
Is it true for most films they need to make 2.5x their budget to be profitable when accounting for advertisement and other costs? I recall seeing that here before.
Somewhat, but as KSwis could explain much better than I can, it really depends on where that money is made. Domestic provides much better return than certain foreign markets.
I knew about it last month...and by the trailers I knew it wasn't going to do very well(in reviews at least, we'll see if it's a box office flop).I had no idea Ben Hur was coming out or even being made and I follow movies daily. Weird.
Yup. The rough guideline is that studios take 55% of the domestic gross, 40% of the international gross (minus China), and 25% of China's gross. International territories all have their individual percentage takes, but that is a good guideline.
Let's look at two extreme examples: Warcraft and Straight Outta Compton. I will round the grosses to the nearest $5M mark for easy numbers.
Warcraft
DOM: $45M
INT: $165M
CHINA: $220M
WW: close to $435M
Using the 55/40/25 guideline, you get ~25 + 66 + 55 = $146M going to the studio (Universal /Legendary)
Straight Outta Compton
DOM: $160M
INT: $40M
CHINA: $0M
WW: around $200M
Using the 55/40/25 guideline, you get 88 + 16 = $104M going to the studio (Universal)
So while Warcraft made more than double Straight Outta Compton worldwide, it's studio cut was maybe 40% higher (ignoring the fact that Legendary's parent company Wanda owns several theatre chains)
Does the average person really know most of the villains attached to superheroes outside of a few big ones?
Really doesn't matter how goofy they're in the comics because we have seen films do great with goofy and boring ass villains. No reason Brainiac or Metallo couldn't make a good villain. Make them interesting enough on film and people will leave with a positive impression. Many of these films introduce these villains for the first time to a good chunk of the audience.
The only discussion is how weak its legs will be.So I'm guessing SS is gonna have a huge drop this weekend because it seems like any and all discussion about it has abruptly stopped this soon
What's the biggest comic villain turn around in a live action movie (outside of a 2 minute throwaway cameo by someone like Batroc)?
Most of the time, what we get on screen is worse than the source material.