umAlso he spelt psycho wrong. So...
umAlso he spelt psycho wrong. So...
I'm familiar with it. It's.... erm. Interesting I guess? Like everything screams out-of-the-box but then you have typical anime shit. Like physical violence ala "protagonist no ecchi!!!!" and also harem hijinks. By no means is it a harem or a comedy. Which is why it's a bit jarring they decided to add these bits. Also the look of the manga isn't much different in its simplicity to that of the anime. The 3D might've been a good choice, since all the faces of the characters are so simple.
I assumed he was just going for the traditional spelling.
Anyway, it's expected that on a forum other people will challenge you on your opinions and comments. It's not expected or acceptable to simply slight other posters. It's even in the TOS:
Why watch anime when you can post about anime on GAF?
Hmm, I kind of got hints of that feeling from this episode. Well, hopefully it'll be good! And yeah, as I said, I don't mind the 3D, I just think the animation is weird.
Even with his reasons it still doesn't make him likeable.
Indeed!Sounds like an internet motto for all things
What is the root of this line of thinking that every protagonist available must be likeable by the audience?
Nah, no need to answer. Let this be my food for thought for today.
I stopped reading after a bit because I just wasn't in the mood for that really weird depressing-looking seinen. It's not especially grim-dark, it's just a very cold and inhuman atmosphere. Like I mentioned in my first episode review, the characters and setting are so cold and mechanical, which kind of work for a dark sci-fi I guess. If you've ever read/watched Gantz then that's something to compare the over-all atmosphere of Knights of Sidonia to. Only with less whiny protagonist I guess. But the presentation is the exact same. It doesn't attempt to appeal to otakus as a whole, but I read there's more harem shit outside of the stuff I saw, though a 'deconstruction' as the guy from MAL put it.
So yeah. Quote me on this, this will be like Gantz in Space. Not something I'm especially looking forward to and probably won't be in my top shows, but it'll be one of the more interesting shows this season.
Audiences want relatable and want somebody to root for. If not relatable at least somebody they like. We've been fed likable and/or relatable characters since our childhood and we like to put our current selves in their shoes. Shinji was relatable in the sense that he was a normal kid. But he was not likable because most people don't think in the sense of 'yeah I was whiny as shit when I was a teenager' but most of us were. We judge the character as our current self and based off other protagonists we enjoy. That strip Narag posted isn't too far off over a Shinji people would've liked. There's a certain point where realistic becomes annoying for audiences.
Audiences eat this shit up. Villains that are just evil for evil's sake are getting fewer by the numbers with each passing day. Now they need to have some sad backstory or some noble over-all basis to their actions. Heck they're making that new Maleficent movie because they wanted to give her depth, which probably means give her a sad backstory. We want to feel for them, that gives us depth. If you have a Hitman character who's a cold killing machine, give him something to protect that changes his views and all of a sudden you know he's not a piece of shit. He's a piece of shit with a heart of gold.
If your main character isn't likable the audience won't tend to care about the rest. That's reality. Critics might care though, hence so many Oscar films with douchey characters.
Audiences want relatable and want somebody to root for. If not relatable at least somebody they like. We've been fed likable and/or relatable characters since our childhood and we like to put our current selves in their shoes. Shinji was relatable in the sense that he was a normal kid. But he was not likable because most people don't think in the sense of 'yeah I was whiny as shit when I was a teenager' but most of us were. We judge the character as our current self and based off other protagonists we enjoy. That strip Narag posted isn't too far off over a Shinji people would've liked. There's a certain point where realistic becomes annoying for audiences.
Audiences eat this shit up. Villains that are just evil for evil's sake are getting fewer by the numbers with each passing day. Now they need to have some sad backstory or some noble over-all basis to their actions. Heck they're making that new Maleficent movie because they wanted to give her depth, which probably means give her a sad backstory. We want to feel for them, that gives us depth. If you have a Hitman character who's a cold killing machine, give him something to protect that changes his views and all of a sudden you know he's not a piece of shit. He's a piece of shit with a heart of gold.
If your main character isn't likable the audience won't tend to care about the rest. That's reality. Critics might care though, hence so many Oscar films with douchey characters.
Yeah I can understand people not liking over powered MC, but personally I'd rather have a confident over powered MC that knows what he's doing, than a two rate sissy that doesn't have balls for example Shinji from Evangelion dude's a fucking coward who can't man up when he needs to.
Audiences want relatable and want somebody to root for. If not relatable at least somebody they like. We've been fed likable and/or relatable characters since our childhood and we like to put our current selves in their shoes. Shinji was relatable in the sense that he was a normal kid. But he was not likable because most people don't think in the sense of 'yeah I was whiny as shit when I was a teenager' but most of us were. We judge the character as our current self and based off other protagonists we enjoy. That strip Narag posted isn't too far off over a Shinji people would've liked. There's a certain point where realistic becomes annoying for audiences.
Audiences eat this shit up. Villains that are just evil for evil's sake are getting fewer by the numbers with each passing day. Now they need to have some sad backstory or some noble over-all basis to their actions. Heck they're making that new Maleficent movie because they wanted to give her depth, which probably means give her a sad backstory. We want to feel for them, that gives us depth. If you have a Hitman character who's a cold killing machine, give him something to protect that changes his views and all of a sudden you know he's not a piece of shit. He's a piece of shit with a heart of gold.
If your main character isn't likable the audience won't tend to care about the rest. That's reality. Critics might care though, hence so many Oscar films with douchey characters.
Oh please. Shinji is by far the strongest eva pilot and has saved his friends and the world countless times. He has more balls than some guy in a show made to pander to otakus.
Happiness Charge Precure 10
I am enjoying this show way too much :,(
If this continues I am forced to watch older PreCure shows. Don't do this to me
We all know he is only the strongest when...he's back in his mothers womb
I really shouldn't have to spoiler this, but apparently there are people who still haven't seen some of these classic anime.
He's the strongest when he is in EVA 01 and its not by some small margin. Asuka recognised that shit and went emo.
I don't see how this changes what I said.
Didn't expect the story to go in this direction, did ya?Hajime no Ippo Rising 23
Well shit, this was pretty damn amazing. Think I'll finish this before going to bed.
I really don't know about the differences, only that Heartcatch ist special.Older shows have their own charms and strong/weak points. Although it really depends on what aspect you're aiming for.
While this is true in lots of more mainstream entertainment the realm of literature, due to it's age and universal reach, contains far more "unlikeable" protagonists than you'd find in, say, anime.Audiences want relatable and want somebody to root for. If not relatable at least somebody they like. We've been fed likable and/or relatable characters since our childhood and we like to put our current selves in their shoes. Shinji was relatable in the sense that he was a normal kid. But he was not likable because most people don't think in the sense of 'yeah I was whiny as shit when I was a teenager' but most of us were. We judge the character as our current self and based off other protagonists we enjoy. That strip Narag posted isn't too far off over a Shinji people would've liked. There's a certain point where realistic becomes annoying for audiences.
Audiences eat this shit up. Villains that are just evil for evil's sake are getting fewer by the numbers with each passing day. Now they need to have some sad backstory or some noble over-all basis to their actions. Heck they're making that new Maleficent movie because they wanted to give her depth, which probably means give her a sad backstory. We want to feel for them, that gives us depth. If you have a Hitman character who's a cold killing machine, give him something to protect that changes his views and all of a sudden you know he's not a piece of shit. He's a piece of shit with a heart of gold.
If your main character isn't likable the audience won't tend to care about the rest. That's reality. Critics might care though, hence so many Oscar films with douchey characters.
Hubert Humphery as relatable everyman
I really don't know about the differences, only that Heartcatch ist special.
When it comes to magical girl shows, I mostly watched unusual like Madoka, Nanoha, Ge'nei and My-Hime (if that counts). I can barely remember Kamikaze Kaitou Jeanne, Sailor Moon and Card Captor Sakura from my childhood.
You mean Humbert Humbert, right?
Hubert Humphery as relatable everyman
Oh please. Shinji is by far the strongest eva pilot and has saved his friends and the world countless times. He has more balls than some guy in a show made to pander to otakus.
I feel like you've given this more thought that anyone involved with the franchise. lolThese are the biggest things wrong with Mahouka. The series has multiple MAJOR problems. Warning: some spoilers.
Gochuumon wa Usagi Desuka - 01
I don't know why but this remind me of ...kirino mosaic
Also anime logic :
Anyway , this anime is going to be quite difficult to stay calm with , the 3 girl are inherently Skill focused and their chemistry is quite good.
8.5/10 Must watch.
I feel like you've given this more thought that anyone involved with the franchise. lol
There are actually lots of problems with the review for me. Maybe it's worth breaking down just to discuss what I think doesn't work.Making fun of ANN reviews is like shooting fish in a barrel. Which, admittedly, I like to do. The only part of that review that I really have a problem with is that one reviewer stating he doesn't like it, but still giving it 4/5. That's some IGN scale right there.
Let's set aside the fact that Ping Pong is irrefutably beautiful to dismantle this stupid paragraph. To begin with, why is it necessary to immediately state that he does not like the show? Even after airing his distaste he immediately distracts himself with the visual design of the show. Is that the reason the writer has such a great disliking for Ping Pong? Further souring the paragraph is the fact that he outlines the remarkable visual aspects in detail but fails to really iterate what it is that makes Ping Pong ugly to him.First, let me be clear that I am not at all a fan of Ping Pong. I also thoroughly detest the kind of visual style used here; it is rough and ugly to my eye. It may be well-animated and the framing of scenes and their progression is handled with expert skill, but that does not overcome abhorrent visual aesthetics.
None of the important facts are highlighted in spite of the fact that the paragraph devolves into run on sentences. Most of the review is overstuffed with language, and this is kind of a running theme across ANN reviews. "Kong is full of discontent" sounds like someone is playing Mad Libs with The New Yorker. Discontented. wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwAnd yet I still cannot hate on Ping Pong as a whole. The story it tells is a fairly basic one, about a cocky, lackadaisical newcomer who gets put in his place by someone he has never met before: someone who is considerably better at his sport of choice than he is. In this case the cocky newcomer is Hoshino (aka Peco), who frequently skips his school club's practice to instead hang out at a local Ping Pong dojo and play for money and bad-mouths upperclassmen because they aren't in his league. He decides to skip one day to check out another school which is supposedly getting in an expert Chinese player, Kong Wenge. Kong is full of discontent for being relegated to what he sees as a Ping Pong backwater and takes his frustrations out on Peco when the latter insists on challenging him in a match, with ugly results for Peco. However, Kong is much more interested in Peco's quiet friend Makoto Tsukimoto (aka Smile), whom he could tell was holding back in a match with Peco that he and his coach overheard. In Makoto, Kong sees a rival potentially worth his time and effort.
See now this is what I'm talking about, even if this isn't a serious. It just comes off as a pretty dumb attempt to slight another poster that's built on the assumption that everyone thinks ANN writers are awful.
It's just not necessary or helpful. If you disagree with someone's reading of a particular show than respond to that. If you simply don't share the same tastes as someone else then there's not really anything interesting that you can say about that because everyone has different tastes in terms of what they enjoy.
Why watch anime when you can post about anime on GAF?
I think its pretty obvious. Kill Me Baby is officially more significant than your favourite anime.Okay I need to know the story here. Why did this happen? How did this happen?
I think they should. It's like their USP. I mean I would never have heard of this story if it wasn't for all the raucous about racist imagery. Lose that and it'll just be another show.i wonder if the terraformars anime is gonna keep all this racist imagery
Any new news you'd like to share?Duckroll ruined Christmas.
I feel my soul being chewed apart by these anime nerd fucks who see something that takes place in the real world as pedestrian. That is what I find most offensive across all of ANN's reviews for Ping Pong. Where are the robots? Where is the amnesia? Where are the love triangles? Where are the idols? Oh, the ping pong paddles don't turn into weapons? Can they at least play sports inside of a virtual world? All of their reviews dig into the fact that Ping pong is "not exactly an original story",
There are actually lots of problems with the review for me. Maybe it's worth breaking down just to discuss what I think doesn't work.
Let's set aside the fact that Ping Pong is irrefutably beautiful to dismantle this stupid paragraph. To begin with, why is it necessary to immediately state that he does not like the show? Even after airing his distaste he immediately distracts himself with the visual design of the show. Is that the reason the writer has such a great disliking for Ping Pong? Further souring the paragraph is the fact that he outlines the remarkable visual aspects in detail but fails to really iterate what it is that makes Ping Pong ugly to him.
I kind of hate to bring this to light, but the language of the piece is really off-putting. The following paragraph spews the events of the episode out in no particular order.
None of the important facts are highlighted in spite of the fact that the paragraph devolves into run on sentences. Most of the review is overstuffed with language, and this is kind of a running theme across ANN reviews. "Kong is full of discontent" sounds like someone is playing Mad Libs with The New Yorker. Discontented. wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
I feel my soul being chewed apart by these anime nerd fucks who see something that takes place in the real world as pedestrian. That is what I find most offensive across all of ANN's reviews for Ping Pong. Where are the robots? Where is the amnesia? Where are the love triangles? Where are the idols? Oh, the ping pong paddles don't turn into weapons? Can they at least play sports inside of a virtual world? All of their reviews dig into the fact that Ping pong is "not exactly an original story",
My understanding that most of it is fanwank about how magic works in the universe though. lolConsidering how over-detailed the LNs supposedly are, I doubt it... the author must have thought it out at least enough to write out all that junk!
Pretty much what I do.
I will say, the thing with reviews - especially of the two paragraph nature - is that you really can't say anything of depth whatsoever. It's a problem with all TV, movie, and game reviews. Only book reviews are allowed to be indulgent, but that's because they probably assume that if you are a reader anyway, you're not going to run away if you see a review that lasts longer than a page.
So, there has to be a point about the plot and how it looks. Then throw in some specific trivia about the show and you're ready to publish and move on to the next review.
It's been almost 200-300 years since books popular as a medium for storytelling (and entertainment). If we go back in time to Victoria Era and read a review on literary magazine, maybe it'll be something similar. And even though book is told, many of its review can't escape the same trap like the bolded part above. It just, critical book reviews are easier to find.
Eric Brown said:Marcus Sedgwick, author of almost 30 books for children and young adults, ramps up the tension, violence and body count in his first novel for adults, A Love Like Blood (Mulholland, £17.99). He has chosen pretty safe territory for his adult initiation: the vampire action adventure subgenre has never been more popular, or overdone. But Sedgwick's account of a man driven to the edge of sanity as he seeks revenge for the murder of his girlfriend across a time frame ranging from 1944 to the late 60s stands head and shoulders above most of the competition on a number of counts: the period detail is convincing, the character of the obsessive hero, Charles Jackson, is finely drawn and the chase across Europe as Jackson tracks the blood-drinking villain is terrifying, thrilling and relentless.
I would guess that popular shoujo/josei stories are more commonly translated into live action because it's possible for them to have a wider reach in that format, rather than the content itself being a mismatch for animation. I don't really know enough about those kinds of shows to really say though. I find the laziest abstraction of reality to be the most distant, and I think there is plenty animation can do as a medium for stories that are grounded closer to what people know.Although I do agree with your point wholeheartedly, I think there is sometimes a case to be made that there are anime that are not particularly well served by being "anime". Ping Pong is irrefutably not one of these shows as Yuasa et al have done a fantastic job of playing to the strengths of animation in making it, but some of the more pedestrian high school shows gain very little from being animated except the occasional SD face. I think that's why so many popular shoujo/josei stories, which tend to be more "grounded" in something approaching reality, get live action adaptations instead of being (poorly) animated; people don't see anything worth animating in such stories.
They weren't even able to do that at the most remedial level.So, there has to be a point about the plot and how it looks. Then throw in some specific trivia about the show and you're ready to publish and move on to the next review.
So I've handled an 18th century book that essentially collected reviews of other children's books, and yes, the reviews were short - but that was almost a function of technological limitation than anything else.It's been almost 200-300 years since books popular as a medium for storytelling (and entertainment). If we go back in time to Victoria Era and read a review on literary magazine, maybe it'll be something similar. And even though book is told, many of its review can't escape the same trap like the bolded part above. It just, critical book reviews are easier to find.
Here I know that the critic believes that one of the strengths of the novel is the use of dramatic irony, because it creates a tension based on what the reader knows and the understanding that the protagonist will catch up at some point. In a few sentences you understand the novel's dramatic structure and one of its main methods of characterization.Dramatic irony isn’t the only pleasure of “You Should Have Known”; Grace’s husband’s pathology is erratic enough for behavior that holds genuine surprise. But the real suspense here lies in wondering when Grace will catch up to the reader. When and how will she come to know what she should have known and at some level maybe already did?
In essence, she says it's style and not substance. But previously she says that the manga is well loved. So is she criticizing the text? Or the adaptation of the text? If so, is this a comment on Yuasa's ability to adapt a work? Or a criticism on his desire to focus on his particular art style? Functionally it is slower than the other two sports shows because Haikyuu has a montage that covers a year of training and Baby Steps starts off in media res and then flashes back. Is she saying that there's a narrative advantage in using such shorthands? If so, what makes them superior to Ping Pong and why?This is obviously going to be a story that builds slowly with characters not tailored to be immediately likable, but unless you're immediately enamored with Yuasa's style, the narrative burn is almost too slow up front. It even seems actively uninteresting compared to the two more conventional sports titles this season. I dunno, I might be the problem in this case. Plenty of people tout the brilliance of Yuasa's Kaiba, and that project left me feeling tepid as well. His work can be alienating, and this noitamina effort clearly leans more prestige project than commercial confection, which is always a risk.