• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

EU- Referendum for the UK..... Neogaf UK are you in or out?

Should the United Kingdom leave the EU?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tak3n

Banned
Zac Goldsmith and Boris Johnson also expected to join the Out campaign!

am I the only one who thinks that is a bit weird, as London Mayors should know that London is built on immigration
 
I don't really get why some people in this thread are against freedom of movement and immigration, it's one of the best parts of the EU...
 

Tak3n

Banned
I don't really get why some people in this thread are against freedom of movement and immigration, it's one of the best parts of the EU...

this is why

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-35604776

a whole town ruined because one companies exploitation and landlords creating shanty towns... of course your answer will be that the police and council need to control it, but we know that is not possible..

The area might of been shit before (I don't know the area at all) but if you have lived in that area your whole life and you see it become this, I expect you would be against mass uncontrolled immigration
 

spuckthew

Member
My long-term girlfriend is French (also dual American) so I'm bias by default since living and working in the UK would possibly not be as straightforward for her. Plus I enjoy the freedom of movement myself since we often go to her parents and Paris.

I personally can't see any benefit to the UK leaving the EU. I'm sure there are ways of solving our problems without such a seemingly knee-jerk referendum.

I'll be voting to stay in.

Incidentally we plan to go State-side next year or the year after, so if this all goes up shit creek we'll just try to move sooner.
 

Linkified

Member
That doesn't really answer my question about the 'moral hazard' in giving an exiting country 'the same or better' as an EU member on issues like trade in a bilateral arrangement between the euro-bloc and the UK.

On that side note though, as you raise it, I'm not an economist but I've read reams of commentary on the particular benefit the euro alone has brought to countries like Germany, nevermind the common market. I'm not sure it's a commonly held belief that these countries would be doing just as well had the EU not existed.

The referendum is about leaving the political union, basically if we voted to leave we would be still be an EEA member but operating under the only worthwhile part of EU, the EFTA.

We could negotiate deals for Trade that benefit us and allow us to prop up our home grown industry as opposed to having to conform to EU whilst Germany/France/Italy gets to circumvent the laws they set up.
 

Calabi

Member
Functionally the EU doesnt work that well, but in others it does. The benefits of being in the EU far out way the downsides though.

Better IN than out would be my vote.
 

Tak3n

Banned
On Daily Politics just now, a in campaigner is not happy that Boris Johnson is playing politics, he is arguing just a month ago he was pro EU, and believes he has been told if he wants to be PM the core Tory vote will be needed and they are all anti EU
 
On Daily Politics just now, a in campaigner is not happy that Boris Johnson is playing politics, he is arguing just a month ago he was pro EU, and believes he has been told if he wants to be PM the core Tory vote will be needed and they are all anti EU

its a huge loss for the IN vote too. His personality has influence across a decent swathe of the population.

Not massively of course. But it could be enough for a percentage point or two
 

Tak3n

Banned
its a huge loss for the IN vote too. His personality has influence across a decent swathe of the population.

Not massively of course. But it could be enough for a percentage point or two

yeah the PM even tried to woo him back on the Andrew Marr show, Nigel Farage told the papers today he can never be PM if he goes for the 'in' campaign
 

Tak3n

Banned
I'm really worried it'll be the old people ruining it for the young, again.

The Irony hey, David Cameron wanted you young un's nowhere near the general election, he would gladly fuck you all over forever while he has the pensioner vote..

now suddenly he wants and needs you :)
 

Lagamorph

Member
Can someone explain something to me.
The out campaign keep going on about how, away from the EU, we'll be able to sign trade deals with other countries like America and China. But what's stopping us from doing that now? Does being in the EU somehow prevent us from having what trade deals we like with countries outside the EU? Do all our trade deals have to be approved by the EU or something? I thought we were already signing trade deals with China and India, so how is leaving the EU supposed to suddenly enable us to sign incredible global trade agreements?

Who's to say those countries would even want to do business with us? Even outside the EU I can't see Russia wanting to do business with us anytime soon unless we made a grovelling apology for calling Putin out on his bullshit and trade deals were ridiculously favoured towards Russia. Unless we disastrously end up with Comrade Corbin in charge then that just isn't going to happen.
 
The referendum is about leaving the political union, basically if we voted to leave we would be still be an EEA member but operating under the only worthwhile part of EU, the EFTA.

We could negotiate deals for Trade that benefit us and allow us to prop up our home grown industry as opposed to having to conform to EU whilst Germany/France/Italy gets to circumvent the laws they set up.


Yeah that's gonna work just great for you. Instead of being in the EU and being able to directly influence the direction the EU is taking, you'll actually just be left with "Take it or leave it options". The Switzerland (Norway etc.) strategy sounds pretty good, until you realize that whenever you negotiate a deal with the EU, it means that you also have to operate under the rules the European Union set.

Any source on the whole 'We have to conform, while Ger/Fr/It profit'?
 

Best

Member
The Irony hey, David Cameron wanted you young un's nowhere near the general election, he would gladly fuck you all over forever while he has the pensioner vote..

now suddenly he wants and needs you :)

Yeah I'm pretty aware of the situation. Entertaining him to see win a GE based mostly on ignorant voters, then have to get them to buy into Europe.
 

Acorn

Member
Sturgeon: Leave vote could trigger independence referendum
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35624750

(Though she says she still doesn't want Brexit to happen)

This guy I know at work is convinced Brexit is the best way to get Scotland to stay in the union somehow. He is a bit of a weirdo about stuff like this though.
I'm in a similar position to Sturgeon. But I think the snp are overestimating the love for the eu in Scotland. None of my friends know anything that isn't in the sun or b.s like that.

We stay and England leaves should trigger a independence vote for all the constituents. I think we'd win that but honestly I'd rather avoid all that b.s and just have all of us vote to stay.
 
Can someone explain something to me.
The out campaign keep going on about how, away from the EU, we'll be able to sign trade deals with other countries like America and China. But what's stopping us from doing that now? Does being in the EU somehow prevent us from having what trade deals we like with countries outside the EU? Do all our trade deals have to be approved by the EU or something?

Yes - it's a large, single market. As such, it's impossible for a single country to sign a trade agreement, because as soon as a good or "service" exists within an EU country, it effectively can travel to any part of the EU as though it never left the country. When it comes to trade, the EU is a single market - there are no individual countries. That's why the sanctioning of Russia had to occur at the EU level, not various domestic levels, for example.
 

Tak3n

Banned
Sturgeon: Leave vote could trigger independence referendum
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35624750

(Though she says she still doesn't want Brexit to happen)

This guy I know at work is convinced Brexit is the best way to get Scotland to stay in the union somehow. He is a bit of a weirdo about stuff like this though.

She is Captain Obvious, that was always going to be said, only helps the out campaign as anyone who wants a independent Scotland could vote politically
 

Lagamorph

Member
Sturgeon: Leave vote could trigger independence referendum
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-35624750

(Though she says she still doesn't want Brexit to happen)

This guy I know at work is convinced Brexit is the best way to get Scotland to stay in the union somehow. He is a bit of a weirdo about stuff like this though.
She has no legal mandate to call a referendum, and like it or not she requires permission from Westminster.
It's also little more than spite and a bad move in the long run, since an independent Scotland will never be able to join the EU anyway, Spain won't allow it.
 

Acorn

Member
She has no legal mandate to call a referendum, and like it or not she requires permission from Westminster.
It's also little more than spite and a bad move in the long run, since an independent Scotland will never be able to join the EU anyway, Spain won't allow it.
She can call a referendum it just isn't binding. If it went for independence you think the uk is gonna stop us?
 

RedShift

Member
She is Captain Obvious, that was always going to be said, only helps the out campaign as anyone who wants a independent Scotland could vote politically

No one is going to vote out for this.

If they live in Scotland they need Scotland to vote stay to trigger a referendum.

If they live in rUK they probably care more about whether or not rUK is in the EU anyway.

She has no legal mandate to call a referendum, and like it or not she requires permission from Westminster.
It's also little more than spite and a bad move in the long run, since an independent Scotland will never be able to join the EU anyway, Spain won't allow it.

Now the referendum is over can we just admit the whole 'Scotland wouldn't be allowed in the EU' thing was bullshit? It's pretty evident No vote was far more likely to end with Scotland outside the EU now.
 

xandaca

Member
In, albeit somewhat reluctantly. The EU is undemocratic, unaccountable and most likely highly corrupt, while free movement is a terrible idea while there's such economic imbalance between so many of the countries. I'm also not mad about the political side, with the EU (again, the largely undemocractic and unaccountable EU) being able to pass legislation that affect every country in the union - although personally, rather than rationally, I can't deny that given how godawful our government is and its willingness to write off any protections for the average person if the Tories' affluent sponsors don't approve, having the EU as a safety net in certain regards (net neutrality) is a relief. The main reasons I'd vote 'in', were there any chance of my being in the country at the time at least, would be for the obvious and enormous trade benefits, as well as the fact that it gives the country some influence - albeit not much, in a union dominated by Germany - on a global stage where we wouldn't stand a chance on our own vs US, China, Russia, etc. On balance, better in than out.
 
She can call a referendum it just isn't binding. If it went for independence you think the uk is gonna stop us?

Pretty much. Spain ignores the Catalonian referendums (or, rather, uses them as data). The most it would do - and this could be just as effective - is to force Westminster into holding another binding referendum.
 

Acorn

Member
In, albeit somewhat reluctantly. The EU is undemocratic, unaccountable and most likely highly corrupt, while free movement is a terrible idea while there's such economic imbalance between so many of the countries. I'm also not mad about the political side, with the EU (again, the largely undemocractic and unaccountable EU) being able to pass legislation that affect every country in the union - although personally, rather than rationally, I can't deny that given how godawful our government is and its willingness to write off any protections for the average person if the Tories' affluent sponsors don't approve, having the EU as a safety net in certain regards (net neutrality) is a relief. The main reasons I'd vote 'in', were there any chance of my being in the country at the time at least, would be for the obvious and enormous trade benefits, as well as the fact that it gives the country some influence - albeit not much, in a union dominated by Germany - on a global stage where we wouldn't stand a chance on our own vs US, China, Russia, etc. On balance, better in than out.

Workers rights will disappear bit by bit if a no vote wins. You want the tories in charge of your rights? The party that seriously considered at will dismissals?
 

Acorn

Member
Pretty much. Spain ignores the Catalonian referendums (or, rather, uses them as data). The most it would do - and this could be just as effective - is to force Westminster into holding another binding referendum.
If we voted out the uk public would say "fine, goodbye". You think the shires are gonna fight for the socialist scots?
 
If we voted out the uk public would say "fine, goodbye". You think the shires are gonna fight for the socialist scots?

I think they'd fight for the nature of the split, yeah. Any kind of independence would be a lengthy process and, for almost every single facet of government, various options could be made which benefit Scotland, rUK or try to be some compromise. Obvious examples include what happens with the national debt, what happens with the currency, what happens with Trident etc. These things would all need to be sorted out and couldn't be feasibly done if Scotland unilaterally declared independence.
 

xandaca

Member
Workers rights will disappear bit by bit if a no vote wins. You want the tories in charge of your rights? The party that seriously considered at will dismissals?

Read what I wrote again. I said, personally, I'm relieved the EU is there as a safety net against the Tories dismantling normal people's rights - even if rationally and objectively, it still doesn't make it right that a largely undemocratic and unaccountable union should be able to pass laws that override those of a democratically elected national government, no matter how odious it may be. I also said I'd vote 'in', albeit with serious caveats.
 

Undead

Member
I find it funny that the I'm not from UK but want to vote and no are almost neck and neck while yes is way behind
 

Acorn

Member
I think they'd fight for the nature of the split, yeah. Any kind of independence would be a lengthy process and, for almost every single facet of government, various options could be made which benefit Scotland, rUK or try to be some compromise. Obvious examples include what happens with the national debt, what happens with the currency, what happens with Trident etc. These things would all need to be sorted out and couldn't be feasibly done if Scotland unilaterally declared independence.

A process which already has contingency plans by both govts from the referendum. It wouldn't happen overnight but it would happen regardless of daddy Westminster okaying a referendum. We vote in and England votes out that is a huge critical split.
 

Acorn

Member
Read what I wrote again. I said, personally, I'm relieved the EU is there as a safety net against the Tories dismantling normal people's rights - even if rationally and objectively, it still doesn't make it right that a largely undemocratic and unaccountable union should be able to pass laws that override those of a democratically elected national government, no matter how odious it may be. I also said I'd vote 'in', albeit with serious caveats.
I was more quoting you and asking a question to the outs. Your position mirrors mine but I'm okay with having rights even if it isn't what the tories want.
Edit autocorrect
 

Walshicus

Member
She has no legal mandate to call a referendum, and like it or not she requires permission from Westminster.
It's also little more than spite and a bad move in the long run, since an independent Scotland will never be able to join the EU anyway, Spain won't allow it.

This is true - I mean Spain still hasn't recognised the United States, India or Estonia.



But in all seriousness, she has more of a mandate to call a referendum than the Cameroid et al have to deny one.
 

gofreak

GAF's Bob Woodward
The referendum is about leaving the political union, basically if we voted to leave we would be still be an EEA member but operating under the only worthwhile part of EU, the EFTA.

We could negotiate deals for Trade that benefit us and allow us to prop up our home grown industry as opposed to having to conform to EU whilst Germany/France/Italy gets to circumvent the laws they set up.

In the latter, new neogiations, all I'd wonder is how easy it'll be dealing with the euro bloc in particular in that case, at least in the short to mid term. It may be a different game to the suggested analogies I sometimes see offered, like Norway etc. Any existing agreements that aren't bound up in EU membership would remain of course, but on any new dealings I think the uk might get a rough ride.

This is all gut feeling speculation though. I think it's a bit strange that people are in a situation where to a certain extent they're blind about the alternative. Is anyone working to try and surface with other eu members what would happen if uk leaves in terms of future dealings? It seems preferred to leave it as a big Unknown, but I have to imagine that even the current UK gov and Cameron are working on contingencies. Will they discuss them before the vote?
 

axisofweevils

Holy crap! Today's real megaton is that more than two people can have the same first name.
In, but I've always been more pro-Europe than most people I know.
 
I'm out because Iain Duncan Smith said if we stay in the EU then terrorists will come here and kill everyone, and that's definitely true because Iain Duncan Smith said it.

(In, obviously.)
 
Workers rights will disappear bit by bit if a no vote wins. You want the tories in charge of your rights? The party that seriously considered at will dismissals?
Yeah. This is my biggest concern about voting Out. Not trade agreements, or anything else. This.
 

Lagamorph

Member
Now the referendum is over can we just admit the whole 'Scotland wouldn't be allowed in the EU' thing was bullshit? It's pretty evident No vote was far more likely to end with Scotland outside the EU now.

It's not though.
If the UK is still part of the EU and Scotland votes for independence then they would automatically be out of the EU, the EU themselves told them this much. Alex Salmond just stuck his fingers in his ears, went "La la la la la" and then outright lied to Scotland by telling them that Scotland would remain an EU member.
When Scotland leaves the EU, their request for admission would require several things,
1) The adopting of the Euro as the countries currency (Not sure how popular this would be in Scotland. It's very unpopular in England at least)
2) A stable economy, this would take years to achieve for a newly independent Scotland and wouldn't have been anytime soon under Alex Salmond's economic policy of "Oil oil oil"
3) The consent of all other existing EU member states. As has been said, Spain would never agree to this as it would only further encourage Catalonian independence.

Literally the only realistic way for Scotland to remain in the EU is to remain a part of the UK.
 
Now the referendum is over can we just admit the whole 'Scotland wouldn't be allowed in the EU' thing was bullshit? It's pretty evident No vote was far more likely to end with Scotland outside the EU now.

It really wasn't bullshit. The Scottish government wrote to the EU Commission asking if they would have to reapply as a new member state and were told categorically yes, they would.

The EU isn't looking for new members right now, and in any case new members have to be unanimously approved by existing not members. Certain members (cough, Spain) have a vested interest in not approving.
 

Walshicus

Member
It's not though.
If the UK is still part of the EU and Scotland votes for independence then they would automatically be out of the EU, the EU themselves told them this much. Alex Salmond just stuck his fingers in his ears, went "La la la la la" and then outright lied to Scotland by telling them that Scotland would remain an EU member.
When Scotland leaves the EU, their request for admission would require several things,
1) The adopting of the Euro as the countries currency (Not sure how popular this would be in Scotland. It's very unpopular in England at least)
2) A stable economy, this would take years to achieve for a newly independent Scotland and wouldn't have been anytime soon under Alex Salmond's economic policy of "Oil oil oil"
3) The consent of all other existing EU member states. As has been said, Spain would never agree to this as it would only further encourage Catalonian independence.

Literally the only realistic way for Scotland to remain in the EU is to remain a part of the UK.

Yeah, this is just supremely ignorant of how real politik works.
 

Lagamorph

Member
Yeah, this is just supremely ignorant of how real politik works.

How so? Please, do enlighten me how easy it would be for Scotland to join the EU.

Scotland was told again and again by both the EU and independent authorities that they would automatically leave the EU as they would be, essentially, a new country. Re-joining would be virtually impossible whilst it needs Spanish approval.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom