I'm so glad I didn't buy into the hype and dodged the bullet.
I was never planning to buy it anyway. >.>
I never understood the hype people got caught up in for a goddamn indie title. This never was going to deliver the revolution people were imagining. The backlash was predestined.
Except Indie games are usually far more revolutionary and innovative than any other type of game.
Same boat. I considered it but I was waiting to see more for the $60 tag.
I'm so glad I didn't buy into the hype and dodged the bullet.
I was never planning to buy it anyway. >.>
Go play every indie game on Steam and then come back and tell me you still believe this hogwash.Except Indie games are usually far more revolutionary and innovative than any other type of game.
GAF as a whole can't help it.never buy into hype.
Except Indie games are usually far more revolutionary and innovative than any other type of game.
GAF as a whole can't help it.
The game that can't even buy a break.
Except the tons of sales.
Why wouldn't this just go in the review thread? Does there need to be another thread for people who don't like a video game to collectively get angry about said video game?
$60I never understood the hype people got caught up in for a goddamn indie title. This never was going to deliver the revolution people were imagining, solely based on common sense. The backlash was predestined.
The reality is the majority of indie games aren't innovative and revolutionary the problem i have when people bring up absurd statements like that is those people only play the games that get hailed as "innovative" "brilliant" or "revolutionary" they don't play the other 20,000 indie games that range from terrible to average.That's the myth. The reality is sometimes different.
Because it's not a reviewWhy wouldn't this just go in the review thread? Does there need to be another thread for people who don't like a video game to collectively get angry about said video game?
The reality is the majority of indie games aren't innovative and revolutionary the problem i have when people bring up absurd statements like that is those people only play the games that get hailed as "innovative" "brilliant" or "revolutionary" they don't play the other 20,000 indie games that range from terrible to average.
The reality is the majority of indie games aren't innovative and revolutionary the problem i have when people bring up absurd statements like that is those people only play the games that get hailed as "innovative" "brilliant" or "revolutionary" they don't play the other 20,000 indie games that range from terrible to average.
Except Indie games are usually far more revolutionary and innovative than any other type of game.
GAF as a whole can't help it.
They often aren't, but if we just stick to those that are revolutionary/creative. Since they absolutely do exist.
Those indie titles are often small in scope. They do one or two very creative things incredibly well, and know to stick with it.
No Man's Sky had huge scope, and people were putting massive AAA expectations on it. Expectations that absolutely could not be fulfilled with a team of 12 people. There's only so much they could do.
Triple A marketing + Triple A price = Triple A expectations + Triple A criticism
this brings it to the point in 30 seconds:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvAwB7ogkik
I don't really get it. Be excited for a game I get, that's all well and good but, don't act like everything is set in stone before you play it.GAF needs to grow the fuck up.
Emotionally attaching yourself to a game that isn't even out.
Why?
So you can wait for a review thread and yell "GOTY" in all caps over and over?
Why?
Why.