MidgarBlowedUp
Member
If you don't use AF you can get some bad shimmering in certain games.
Bi-linear can help but usually ends up giving you ultra blurry textures at different distances.
Tri-linear is an improvement over Bi-Linear except you get some strange looking crap depending on camera angles. It's fine for some things but pretty crappy looking in others.
AF fixes all this shit.
AF is what all next gen games need.
However, I can see how someone would prefer some games at lower resolution with AF than a higher resolution without it. (I probably would depending on the game) It also doesn't matter to me if certain games are 30fps or 40fps as neither are 60fps so, neither will match a proper refresh rate. So if given the choice between 1600x900 @ 30fps with AF vs 1920x1080 @ 30fps without AF. I may choose the lower resolution depending on the display being used.
In the end DF could be "subjectively" correct here.
Bi-linear can help but usually ends up giving you ultra blurry textures at different distances.
Tri-linear is an improvement over Bi-Linear except you get some strange looking crap depending on camera angles. It's fine for some things but pretty crappy looking in others.
AF fixes all this shit.
AF is what all next gen games need.
However, I can see how someone would prefer some games at lower resolution with AF than a higher resolution without it. (I probably would depending on the game) It also doesn't matter to me if certain games are 30fps or 40fps as neither are 60fps so, neither will match a proper refresh rate. So if given the choice between 1600x900 @ 30fps with AF vs 1920x1080 @ 30fps without AF. I may choose the lower resolution depending on the display being used.
In the end DF could be "subjectively" correct here.