• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony teasing The Order sneak peak at 1pm PT today.

Status
Not open for further replies.

StuBurns

Banned
Definitely a popular genre last gen. I must admit I only bought Uncharted but couldn't stand shooting so many "real" people, so skipped other similar titles.

I'm not too impressed with shooting people in The Order either, I'd prefer to just attack the undead / werewolves.
You're in luck then.

Vanquish is the best of the genre gameplay wise, no people in there.
 

FeiRR

Banned
The problem with this scenario is just what I said in my original reply: the very nature of her death.
I think her social background could be a bigger problem. She was a peasant and the knights here are from the royal class, which I think adds to the story (I bet the rebels come from the working class). I'm also not sure what would Sony say to picture an actual saint in a game. They're quite cautious about this kind of stuff in their first parties.

Also, I don't think the characters in The Order are truly immortal per se. They clearly still age, just at a incredibly diminished rate. I don't know how effective the elixir is to keep a person like Joan of Arc alive into 1886. That would be like 450+ years after her death.

As I remember from the GI coverage, some of them are over 600 yo.
 
Don't you want something new from the new IPs? We've had so many studios recycling the GoW template for 8 years now and many of the IPs that come out around launch will be made in franchises. I just don't want graphics to evolve, I want new gameplay ideas in AAA games.

care to elaborate to the rest of us who doesn't even know how TPS can be revolutionize?
For god sake it's TPS, what more do u want?
 

UrbanRats

Member
On the plus side if you substitute The Order for TLOU , this thread is an awful lot like the ones we had when it was first shown.

A million GOAT awards later.....


I guess it helps my hype that I actually own a PS4.

? The first gameplay reveal of tLoU was very impressive, even from a gamedesign point of view, so much so, that many were skeptical of it being true (and infact it was toned down a bit in the final version).
This, on the other hand, looks like a very by the numbers cover shooter with amazing graphics and a cool setting.

Personally i'm kind of bummed that we're getting a setting this interesting, but they have still managed to go out of their way to shove in a cover shooter gameplay anyway.
It feels like a missed opportunity to try something new or less trite.

Of course the game's not out yet, so it's just knee jerk impressions i'm expressing.
We'll see how it goes.
 

IvorB

Member
? The first gameplay reveal of tLoU was very impressive, even from a gamedesign point of view, so much so, that many were skeptical of it being true (and infact it was toned down a bit in the final version).
This, on the other hand, looks like a very by the numbers cover shooter with amazing graphics and a cool setting.

Personally i'm kind of bummed that we're getting a setting this interesting, but they have still managed to go out of their way to shove in a cover shooter gameplay anyway.
It feels like a missed opportunity to try something new or less trite.

Of course the game's not out yet, so it's just knee jerk impressions i'm expressing.
We'll see how it goes.

I actually really like third-person cover shooters but I have to agree with you. The gameplay looks pretty cookie-cutter and by-the-numbers and doesn't like up to the promise of those early screens.
 
You're in luck then.

Vanquish is the best of the genre gameplay wise, no people in there.

I keep meaning to pick that up.

I'm pretty loose with the definition of killing people, Uncharted annoyed me most when every encounter was me killing people I presumed were friends of each other, possibly family members, and each time all they wanted to do was end the terror of the guy that's murdering everyone they know.

Now, it looks like in The Order you get to murder working-class British people who are part of a resistance army against the elite class. It's like you're on the wrong side of a civil conflict!
 

RoboPlato

I'd be in the dick
The problem with this scenario is just what I said in my original reply: the very nature of her death.

She was burned at the stake. There wouldn't have been very much of her left to restore.

I severely doubt the elixir could recreate a person from blackened ash, no matter how salubrious it was! :)

If they were going to include her, they would have to alter the circumstances of her death or (more likely) pretend it never happened. Now this is plausible in a world like this, since it is an alternate history. Just seems a little more difficult given how famous and legendary the death of Joan of Arc is.

Also, I don't think the characters in The Order are truly immortal per se. They clearly still age, just at a incredibly diminished rate. I don't know how effective the elixir is to keep a person like Joan of Arc alive into 1886. That would be like 450+ years after her death.

Most of the Knights are 600 years old.
 

zebaz08

Member
Ok. FINALLY watched it. To my surprise it actually looks really good (graphically). Like, stunning. Better than anything out. I'm a sucker for games with this kind of Victorian setting, though. Reminded me of Dishonored. Steampunk maybe? Not sure if it is.

Only thing that I wasn't too keen on was the aiming. Looked a little TLoU/Uncharted-ish (and I hated gunplay in those). It's hard to say whether it'll be completely derivative with that short of a preview, lol. Calm down GAF! Hopefully what they show at E3 quells concerns.


But TLOU's gunplay is different from Uncharted's.
 

GameSeeker

Member
I'm still waiting for Sony to release some high quality footage of the new The Order:1886 trailer (maybe next week), but from the stream it's clear that RAD is going to set a new benchmark for graphics. Ryse and KZ:SF were the two best looking launch games and since then only Infamous: Second Son has surpassed them. The Order: 1886 is looking to be on par or better than Infamous:SS. That's a very impressive feat.

On the gameplay side, I love that people are calling it a "Gears clone". Gears of War was one of my favorite series (first 3 games) on the 360. By combining Gears of War gameplay with Uncharted like story telling, RAD is on the right track. RAD is not a no-name or new developer. They have an excellent track and there will be a ton of crow eating when this game launches.
 

kevm3

Member
Maybe the guy playing the game sucks, but the aiming looks bad. Looks like standard stop and pop. Graphics are nice though.
 

RulkezX

Member
? The first gameplay reveal of tLoU was very impressive, even from a gamedesign point of view, so much so, that many were skeptical of it being true (and infact it was toned down a bit in the final version).
This, on the other hand, looks like a very by the numbers cover shooter with amazing graphics and a cool setting.

Personally i'm kind of bummed that we're getting a setting this interesting, but they have still managed to go out of their way to shove in a cover shooter gameplay anyway.
It feels like a missed opportunity to try something new or less trite.

Of course the game's not out yet, so it's just knee jerk impressions i'm expressing.
We'll see how it goes.

The TLOU reveal thread was a choked full of.

Oh noes , more zombies

Yawn

Oh wow another ND 3rd person game

This looks boring.

It was a carbon copy of this thread.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
It's weird how Sony and RAD keep accidentally releasing these clips and pictures and interviews and articles that apparently don't represent the major video game release they're going to be selling on stores at the end of this year.

It must be a set of wacky mix ups behind the scenes.

I know, right.
 
the videos show the first chapters where the overall gamemechanics are shown and characters are introduced. i really think that the game will be pretty good.
 
There were similar moment in TLOU and Uncharted. In fact there are similar moments in hundreds of games. It's just finding something to complain about and you know it.
As far as I can remember from LoU,
there was just the one arm-in-arm shooting section, and it was used to further the story in a rather inventive way (it was neat how Joel's skills rapidly deteriorated and it tied into the desperation of the situation
.

In this video, it looks like nothing more than a boring attempt to evoke excitement.
 

BumRush

Member
? The first gameplay reveal of tLoU was very impressive, even from a gamedesign point of view, so much so, that many were skeptical of it being true (and infact it was toned down a bit in the final version).
This, on the other hand, looks like a very by the numbers cover shooter with amazing graphics and a cool setting.

Personally i'm kind of bummed that we're getting a setting this interesting, but they have still managed to go out of their way to shove in a cover shooter gameplay anyway.
It feels like a missed opportunity to try something new or less trite.

Of course the game's not out yet, so it's just knee jerk impressions i'm expressing.
We'll see how it goes.

To me, THIS post was the way to handle an "I'm not overly impressed" reaction, rather than the way it's been handled countless times in this thread. If developers are reading the thread, this post is what would makes them want to show something different at E3
 
the videos show the first chapters where the overall gamemechanics are shown and characters are introduced. i really think that the game will be pretty good.

Yeah I think this may be when they first enter the place or possibly the one of the early encounters. I suspect later on you will be facing the werewolves.
 

antitrop

Member
Ready at Dawn have to prove they know how to make a good shooter, but this little teaser sure doesn't help their case. Looks like presentation over substance, so far.

This looks like the Ryse of third person shooters, to me.
 
The actual E3 demo gameplay thread is nothing like that though:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=476888

It's mostly praise. Awesome, amazing, incredible etc.

Even the TLoU trailer received far more positivity than this sneak peak of gameplay.
Yes, but NaughtyDog can put a pile of shit last gen as a trailer and people who would be all over it. I won't be surprised if Uncharted 4 builds from their momentum of last generation and sells more than U2, U3 and TLOU all of which sold 6m+. I'm willing to bet 8-9 million for the next Uncharted.
 

GameSeeker

Member
The TLOU is very late era. So that system war is low as people learn to move on (Post numbers prove it). Now we are in fresh new system war.

Exactly. Lots of folks waging system wars through indirect comments on games. This is happening with all the major system exclusive (e.g., Ryse, KZ:SF, Forza 5, Infamous:SS, etc.).

Once you separate the system wars from The Order: 1886, the comments look much more positive.
 

StuBurns

Banned
Exactly. Lots of folks waging system wars through indirect comments on games. This is happening with all the major system exclusive (e.g., Ryse, KZ:SF, Forza 5, Infamous:SS, etc.).

Once you separate the system wars from The Order: 1886, the comments look much more positive.
How do you know who's pretending?
 

vpance

Member
Some of the art so far.

ss0.jpg


The-Order-1886-screenshot-011.jpg


tumblr_mry7zfWG1Y1sssp5yo2_1280.jpg


998748_753077908051540_441990615_n.jpg


The-Order-2.jpg


468px-Order_1866_image001.png

Are they really gonna be able to pull this off with a team of 100 devs? I think we'll be lucky to see 2 of the above environments fully done up.
 
Didn't feel that different to me. I know TLoU places less emphasis on it, but both felt wonky. I realize I'm in the minority.
Did you actually play the games? They're quite different, not sure how someone can say the complete opposite with a straight face.
InFamous Second Son had a similar development team size and look how that turned out!
And was quite barebones in terms of content. The NPC in that game was really pointless. If RAD creates a lot of people walking in the streets, I really hope they make them feel like they belong and not so lifeless.
 
The TLOU is very late era. So that system war is low as people learn to move on (Post numbers prove it). Now we are in new fresh system war.

I don't think it has anything to do with system wars. Pretty sure you will find people unimpressed with this sneak peak who were very positive about TLoU's showing. RAD just haven't presented the game well.
 

breakfuss

Member
Did you actually play the games? They're quite different, not sure how someone can say the complete opposite with a straight face

Nah, just sharing opinions on games I've never played. I don't see what's so hard to understand. Shooting is probably my least favorite thing in Uncharted and TLoU. Was trying to be gracious and not outright call it 'bad'. They might approach it differently but it results in the same unwieldy feeling.
 
I don't think it has anything to do with system wars. Pretty sure you will find people unimpressed with this sneak peak who were very positive about TLoU's showing. RAD just haven't presented the game well.
That would be me. Thankfully I still hope Sony/RAD didn't show all the game has in store.


Hopefully.
 

SDCowboy

Member
At the end of the video one of the guys says to find a way out of there. That gives me hope for the exploration side...assuming the way out isn't just opening a door behind them. lol
 

UrbanRats

Member
The TLOU reveal thread was a choked full of.

Oh noes , more zombies

Yawn

Oh wow another ND 3rd person game

This looks boring.

It was a carbon copy of this thread.

Well maybe i'm applying selective memory here, but i remember people being pretty impressed by the fluidity of the game, as well as the dynamic behaviour of the enemies and Joel's and Ellie's interaction with them.
I'm talking about the gameplay video showing Joel and Ellie going through the Hotel flooded, btw, which was the first real extensive look at the game's gameplay.
 

vpance

Member
InFamous Second Son had a similar development team size and look how that turned out!

A small and unrealistically designed city, low on content and short on story. Great on graphics though of course. I've said it here before but there was unrealized potential in that game.
 

Shredderi

Member
The game should have had Multiplayer. I never really play the single player campaign in shooters.

Then this game is propably just not for you. I don't think that there will be any shortage of multiplayer shooters in the future so I'm just glad to get games like these that devote themselves to a (hopefully) good single player campaigns. Although, I do think that this game would have benefitted from a co-op option.
 

StuBurns

Banned
Uncharted and TLoU don't feel anything like each other in terms of aiming. In fact, UC2 and 3 barely feel anything like one another.
 

PJV3

Member
The gameplay may be standard fare, but the setting and story is the main attraction for me anyway. Nothing so far has lessened my interest in the game.
 

Loudninja

Member
Yeah it obvious that he is shooting above and around the enemy to ignite the gas cloud.
The thermite rifle is the flashiest and most devastating of the bunch Ready At Dawn has revealed so far. Pellets packed with strips of aluminum iron oxide are blasted into the environment, which then break open into a cloud of glittery metal paper. A high temperature flare is then shot into the cloud, creating a chemical reaction that turns the cloud into a burning mass of melting metal. This devastating weapon is perfect for punishing enemies hiding behind cover.
http://www.gameinformer.com/b/featu...he-weapons-and-gadgets-of-the-order-1886.aspx
 
Nah, just sharing opinions on games I've never played. I don't see what's so hard to understand. Shooting is probably my least favorite thing in Uncharted and TLoU. Was trying to be gracious and not outright call it 'bad'. They might approach it differently but it results in the same unwieldy feeling.
I don't have a problem with you feeling like both franchises have bad aiming and you don't like it. I have a problem you saying they both played the same, which is flat out wrong. You may as well compare every 3rd person game that uses guns being the same if you put those two in the same category.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom