Subpar Scrub
Banned
Cool. I look forward to seeing what they have.
Did you miss new and first party? Is reading that hard?
Cool. I look forward to seeing what they have.
Just popped into the "what Sony have" thread to hopefully learn about their upcoming lineup. it's amazing how excited some people are over exclusive marketing, including it in listwarz lists.
Apparently according to one poster there's no way tomb raider and halo 5 can compete with star wars exclusive marketing (ignoring the fact that swbf is coming to xbox too).
I left the thread again never to return.
Edit: This post is on topic cos it was about first party games in theory!
Just popped into the "what Sony have" thread to hopefully learn about their upcoming lineup. it's amazing how excited some people are over exclusive marketing, including it in listwarz lists.
Apparently according to one poster there's no way tomb raider and halo 5 can compete with star wars exclusive marketing (ignoring the fact that swbf is coming to xbox too).
I left the thread again never to return.
I may vehemently oppose their use but I can't argue with the results of shared marketing. Destiny was pretty much a case study of game development and marketing. It showed just how effective shared marketing can be. Whether I like it or not, I won't deny its a powerful (albeit scummy) marketing tool. But there is no way to know how effective any exclusive game or marketing deal will be until the day of. Anyone proclaiming otherwise (including myself as evidenced by my tag) is kidding themselves.
That said it's incredibly disingenuous to portray marketing deal support as being only Sony fans or only MS fans. Both sides mindlessly feed at that company trough. Whether its fawning over potential timed DLC in Battlefront/CoD, celebrating purchased exclusivity of Tomb Raider, or salivating at the thought of other possible purchased exclusivity rights in the lead up to E3 both sides do it and its disgusting. Gamers honestly have nobody to blame but themselves for the current state of affairs with AAA development. Most are too busy getting tied up in brand loyalty to see these practices for what they are and rightfully condemn them.
Oh, so you didn't understand the thread/posts then? Okay.Just popped into the "what Sony have" thread to hopefully learn about their upcoming lineup. it's amazing how excited some people are over exclusive marketing, including it in listwarz lists.
Apparently according to one poster there's no way tomb raider and halo 5 can compete with star wars exclusive marketing (ignoring the fact that swbf is coming to xbox too).
I left the thread again never to return.!
ExactlyThe premise of that thread is how Sony can compete against MS this fall sales-wise. Marketing deals are very relevant when discussing that premise.
Microsoft always had problems with first party titles. They need more variety. You can't expect everyone to fall in love with Halo or Gears of War.
Yep, to discredit CBOAT is nothing short of a joke, it's unfortunately MS fanboys that couldn't take it that CBOAT was posting bad news about them. He was just an insider for MS, it's not his fault the news was bad as he didn't make the decisions (?) End of the day someone could write a list of what he's said is the past and the evidence is out there to prove he was right. I recall he said titanfall was going to be exclusive for example, you don't just throw shot on the wall and see what sticks. Well you can like the parrot avatar guy but not CBOAT, he was so on point that is also seemed pretty clear along with the way he wrote that he was working at MS.
Since XB1 reveal his accounts been taken over, refuse to believe anything else as nothing else makes sense. Except what another member said, that he was caught out and feared for his job so started posting shit to take the heat off.
That said it's incredibly disingenuous to portray marketing deal support as being only Sony fans or only MS fans. Both sides mindlessly feed at that company trough. Whether its fawning over potential timed DLC in Battlefront/CoD, celebrating purchased exclusivity of Tomb Raider, or salivating at the thought of other possible purchased exclusivity rights in the lead up to E3 both sides do it and its disgusting. Gamers honestly have nobody to blame but themselves for the current state of affairs with AAA development. Most are too busy getting tied up in brand loyalty to see these practices for what they are and rightfully condemn them.
But Sony isnt better either...
Another Killzone, another GodOfWar, another Uncharted and another Ratchet game.
I dont get why microsoft always has to take flak when Sony is mostly doing the same.
The home console market is an oligopoly (of 2 companies currently). Consoles differentiate themselves on the premise of exclusive content and services. Whether that content is third party, first party or what have you doesn't matter to consumers at large.
Sure you have those truly concerned about best practices in the hobby like a great number of gaffers, like you, me and many others that much prefer the old system of "first party" exclusives as being the ONLY type of exclusive content used to differentiate BUT, that changed long ago and became a staple last gen, primarily associated with MS and the Xbox 360 snatching marketing rights for the biggest franchise of last gen. Sony naturally engaged in the practice, but more so to avoid being left in the dust this gen. What you're seeing now is parity more or less - and that has got people talking.
Many gamers who have made a conscious choice to own a single platform and see owning both consoles as an improbability are simply being rational about wanting their console of choice offer the best content relevant to them - and anything that can help the platform succeed is also seen as a positive. Consumers react to that positively on the grand scheme of things.
It's really not that hard to understand from where I am sitting.
I never said it was hard to understand? The reasons why are obvious but despite knowing why I happen to think its indefensible (and disgusting). Kinda confused as to where you got "hard to understand" from.
lol That confirmation bias. CBOAT dropped a lot of bad news for MS because he is:
1) In a closer position to MS than Sony ad can be more elaborate.
2) MS has a history of screwing the pooch repeatedly thus giving CBOAT the information he did.
The narrative that CBOAT was an insider with a bone to pick with MS is funny considering he's dropped both good and bad news for different sources over the years. The MS faithful on GAF got irritated with the face that he dropped so much bad info until the leaker ntkrnl (who I still believe was a controlled leak from MS to discredit CBOAT) dropped the motherload and the rest is history. While his last few leaks haven't panned out, the fact remains that CBOAT has given some of the best leaks GAF has ever gotten for OVER 10 YEARS. The idea that people are ready to discredit him so quickly has my head spinning. Joker was right in The Dark Knight. It's a bad joke.
Lol, hes at junk status. Ntkrl leaks was the biggest in gaming (not just GAF). Even CBoat dropped in and had nothing to say.You hit the nail on the head!
Lol, hes at junk status. Ntkrl leaks was the biggest in gaming (not just GAF). Even CBoat dropped in and had nothing to say.
I'm also of the opinion that Nktrl was a controlled leak. He came along at a time when MS were desperate for some good publicity and dropped a bunch of bombs for 2+ years in the future about games that they knew would get the hardcore hyped. I don't know when or if Cboat lost his shit like you're suggesting, but he was a much more consistent and reliable poster over a much longer period of time.
I'm also of the opinion that Nktrl was a controlled leak. He came along at a time when MS were desperate for some good publicity and dropped a bunch of bombs for 2+ years in the future about games that they knew would get the hardcore hyped. I don't know when or if Cboat lost his shit like you're suggesting, but he was a much more consistent and reliable poster over a much longer period of time.
You just named 4 different type of games, where halo/gears can just be lumped into the 'shooter' categoryBut Sony isnt better either...
Another Killzone, another GodOfWar, another Uncharted and another Ratchet game.
I dont get why microsoft always has to take flak when Sony is mostly doing the same.
Oh, so you didn't understand the thread/posts then?
The premise of that thread is how Sony can compete against MS this fall sales-wise. Marketing deals are very relevant when discussing that premise.
It's a topic about what Sony's teams might be up to and discussion about what games we may like to see etc. The premise of this topic wasn't a straight up sales thread, it just got turned into that.
You just named 4 different type of games, where halo/gears can just be lumped into the 'shooter' category
More variety on Sony, plus Persona
Sorry but that is absurd, someone from MS would ruin their e3 and give competitors information about their year, I dont buy it.
I would love to be in the room where Bill Gates decided to have a controlled leak on NeoGAF
I may vehemently oppose their use but I can't argue with the results of shared marketing. Destiny was pretty much a case study of bizarre game development and shared marketing. It showed just how effective shared marketing can be. Whether I like it or not, I won't deny its a powerful (albeit scummy) marketing tool. But there is no way to know how effective any exclusive game or marketing deal will be until the day of. Anyone proclaiming otherwise (including myself as evidenced by my tag) is kidding themselves.
That said it's incredibly disingenuous to portray marketing deal support as being only Sony fans or only MS fans. Both sides mindlessly feed at that company trough. Whether its fawning over potential timed DLC in Battlefront/CoD, celebrating purchased exclusivity of Tomb Raider, or salivating at the thought of other possible purchased exclusivity rights in the lead up to E3 both sides do it and its disgusting. Gamers honestly have nobody to blame but themselves for the current state of affairs with AAA development. Most are too busy getting tied up in brand loyalty to see these practices for what they are and rightfully condemn them.
Yet Destiny still sold more on Xbone launch week.
Yet Destiny still sold more on Xbone launch week.
It was given away (same as the UK) as a 'choose a free' game deal, so it was not part of a bundle and counted as a sale. PS4 copies weren't counted because they were bundled.
Tomb Raider 2/Quantum Break - TPS
Halo 4 - FPS
Forza 6 - Racer
Killer Instinct S3 - Fighter
Crackdown - Open world
Rare game - Platformer?
Missing Genre - RPG
Doesn't Scalebound counts towards an Action/RPG at least ? idk why everyone seems to forget about scale bound
Doesn't Scalebound counts towards an Action/RPG at least ? idk why everyone seems to forget about scale bound
You just named 4 different type of games, where halo/gears can just be lumped into the 'shooter' category
More variety on Sony, plus Persona
Nobody has forgotten. Kamiya doesn't make RPGs.
Just popped into the "what Sony have" thread to hopefully learn about their upcoming lineup. it's amazing how excited some people are over exclusive marketing, including it in listwarz lists.
Apparently according to one poster there's no way tomb raider and halo 5 can compete with star wars exclusive marketing (ignoring the fact that swbf is coming to xbox too).
I left the thread again never to return.
Edit: This post is on topic cos it was about first party games in theory!
Yet Destiny still sold more on Xbone launch week.
Or that Microsoft was giving the game away for free if you purchased a Xbox one (as a physical copy)Except it did not. If you're looking at September 2014 NPD, it does not take into account bundles.
What I would want as a exclusive IP from Microsoft, would definitely fall in the action/rpg category.
An open world series, a new world, not just a city. Cooperative Multiplayer, doesn't have to be strictly a shooter, but have guns, crossbows, axes, swords... Maybe the Holy trinity of tank/dps/healer
Idk.. Something different and refreshing, emphasis on survival
yeah doesn't he make like Action/Adventure ? if thats the case thats still another genre in the bag also note they have Fable Legends and I'm sure Lions head said that was classified as an RPG so what other genres can they pull is the question
But Sony isnt better either...
Another Killzone, another GodOfWar, another Uncharted and another Ratchet game.
I dont get why microsoft always has to take flak when Sony is mostly doing the same.
Or that Microsoft was giving the game away for free if you purchased a Xbox one (as a physical copy)
A lot of DestinyGAF went digital
There was a PS4 White Destiny bundle, no?
Microsoft wasn't even allowed to say it was on their console as part of the Sony marketing deal.
I think it shows marketing deals are pointless.
Just popped into the "what Sony have" thread to hopefully learn about their upcoming lineup. it's amazing how excited some people are over exclusive marketing, including it in listwarz lists.
Apparently according to one poster there's no way tomb raider and halo 5 can compete with star wars exclusive marketing (ignoring the fact that swbf is coming to xbox too).
I left the thread again never to return.
Edit: This post is on topic cos it was about first party games in theory!
I love this mythical hidden teams at Sony Studios that are creating millions of new IPs...The difference is Sony has like 6+ other major studios not working on those series whereas aside from Rare who's been on Kinect for the past 7 years, MS's major first party studios consist of
343 - Halo
Turn 10 - Forza
Black Tusk - Gears
Lionhead - Fable
The first three of those have never made a game out of their respective series and lion head has been on Fable for the past 10 years. Those first three are basically bound to those series, Lionhead is the only one with a real chance of making a different IP.
As for your points on Sony the only one that holds is God of War really. Naughty Dog released a new IP just over a year ago, Killzone guys are making a new RPG IP, and Insomniac isn't a first party studio.
Yet Destiny still sold more on Xbone launch week.
Mythical? Huh? They dont exist? Horizon, the order dont exist? Sony bend dont etc...it is not a myth...I love this mythical hidden teams at Sony Studios that are creating millions of new IPs...
Your really cant disprove my point. It doesnt matter if there was a Last of Us. There will be a Last of Us 2...
So at the end, Sony isnt better than Microsoft.
That sounds damn good. X1 needs more and drastically different exclusives. I like Halo, Gears and others, but something else is needed.What I would want as a exclusive IP from Microsoft, would definitely fall in the action/rpg category.
An open world series, a new world, not just a city. Cooperative Multiplayer, doesn't have to be strictly a shooter, but have guns, crossbows, axes, swords... Maybe the Holy trinity of tank/dps/healer
Idk.. Something different and refreshing, emphasis on survival
I love this mythical hidden teams at Sony Studios that are creating millions of new IPs...
Your really cant disprove my point. It doesnt matter if there was a Last of Us. There will be a Last of Us 2...
So at the end, Sony isnt better than Microsoft.
Having star wars on your box this holiday will help.... FactThere was a PS4 White Destiny bundle, no?
Microsoft wasn't even allowed to say it was on their console as part of the Sony marketing deal.
I think it shows marketing deals are pointless.