Kssio_Aug
Member
Yeah, ok! That gif convinced me! The lighting is waaaay better then the previous games!
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Fallout 4 Officially Revealed for PC, Xbox One, PS4 [Reddit Rumor = Ban]
- Thread starter chadskin
- Start date
Yeah, ok! That gif convinced me! The lighting is waaaay better then the previous games!
Who wants on the Hype Train?
Get me in there, please!
KatamariOnTheRocks
Member
My insinuation was not that an open world game can achieve the same graphics as those more linear experiences. It was that a higher level of graphical fidelity is expected across the board when it's been proven possible on this Gen of hardware.
I wouldn't expect this fallout to look like the order or TLOU remastered, but I certainly expect it to look better than a 360/ps3 game, which it does not.
Is your problem with the fact that I have standards and expect improvements between games made by the same dev?
ProvenDeadly
Member
Not even Fallout 4 could stop the typical complainers.
Interceptor
Banned
Looks like a Fallout Game.
Looks like a Gamebryo Game.
No surprises here. What i don´t like about Gamebryo is how items and small objects look in the game. Somehow thrown together with no weight or connection to the world.
No shadows, ssao or whatever.
Looks like a Gamebryo Game.
No surprises here. What i don´t like about Gamebryo is how items and small objects look in the game. Somehow thrown together with no weight or connection to the world.
No shadows, ssao or whatever.
Yeah. I don't really gel with Fallout in general nor with the Bethesda style RPG as I personally find them a bit bland. I really liked what Obsidian did with NV.
But hey, maybe Bethesda has improved, learned and iterated?
Yes please. Bring back Mark Morgan!
Acquiescence
Member
People complaining about the graphics are forgetting how cruddy Fallout 3 looked. Now that was a nasty ass game to the eyes.
CassidyIzABeast
Member
Fallout 3: Definitive Edition, Fallout 3: Anniversary, or Fallout 3: Redux
daninthemix
Member
Well it was basically Elder Scrolls combat for melee. What I want is decent gun combat! Like, FPS quality gun combat.
Rollo Tomasi
Member
Who pissed in your coffee this morning?
-tetsuo-
Unlimited Capacity
Such as?
Hidden One
Member
Can you ship me your rig so I can play it?
DrROBschiz
Member
They ARE below the bar set by other games but its more than serviceable and quite a leap over Skyrim at least
Besthelboy
Banned
We've been at a point where you don't need to make good games to get sales for a while now. Though this recent phenomenon of praising a game's faults is something so weird. The graphics aren't very good, we all expected better.
There hasn't been any features or game play shown, there's been a few environments on display that look very interesting. We have no idea how large the actual world is yet, of course people should be excited if they're a big fan of the series but we literally know nothing about this game yet.
The graphics aren't very good for a game of this generation. Comparing it to Fallout 3 or GTA SA is dumb and hyperbole but that doesn't mean the fidelity is anything we expected, it's worse. Most don't care and they're excited for the game and it's fine, I don't care too much about the graphics either but to defend the graphics saying they look good is just as bad. All games have faults, some larger than others.
There hasn't been any features or game play shown, there's been a few environments on display that look very interesting. We have no idea how large the actual world is yet, of course people should be excited if they're a big fan of the series but we literally know nothing about this game yet.
The graphics aren't very good for a game of this generation. Comparing it to Fallout 3 or GTA SA is dumb and hyperbole but that doesn't mean the fidelity is anything we expected, it's worse. Most don't care and they're excited for the game and it's fine, I don't care too much about the graphics either but to defend the graphics saying they look good is just as bad. All games have faults, some larger than others.
whynotboth.gif
BlackNinja
Banned
Looks ok. Nothing that screams omg. But its Fallout, so I'm all in.
banefirelord
Banned
Amen to this.
It doesn't really have crossgen graphics. You could not achieve that on a PS3 or 360.
Looks good. Doesn't meet my hopes of "next-gen visuals" when I dreamed about how I hoped graphics would look before this gen started. (but this has been a slight let down all gen long)
The dog needs some more polys or some better fur...but when the trailer got to this part:
is when I thought it looked pretty good. 1080p and a rock solid 30fps on PS4, please.
The dog needs some more polys or some better fur...but when the trailer got to this part:
is when I thought it looked pretty good. 1080p and a rock solid 30fps on PS4, please.
Mendax
Member
I didnt like it in F3 but I did in Dying Light so hope its more like the latter.
Summer Haze
Banned
You really need to go back and play some last-gen games
Gormenghast
Member
Problem with Bethesda games is that they are designed around the tools they have, instead of coding an engine and a game around features they want.
That's why all their games end up being so formulaic and pretty much the same between each other. It's like going from Skyrim to Fallout they only develop a mod for their own game.
And since it relies so much on middleware, they got no clue about how to actually transform it in meaningful ways. So they can just spend more money to hire more artists and add more detail, but the core game barely improves.
That's why all their games end up being so formulaic and pretty much the same between each other. It's like going from Skyrim to Fallout they only develop a mod for their own game.
And since it relies so much on middleware, they got no clue about how to actually transform it in meaningful ways. So they can just spend more money to hire more artists and add more detail, but the core game barely improves.
RPGCrazied
Member
The system requirements aren't all that high for Fallout 3, are you on a netbook or something?
Obliterator
Member
Current Gen only? Thank GOD SO HYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYPED!!!!!!
Also who cares about the visuals? They look plenty good enough, and Bethesda games have never been about graphics anyways. Well Skyrim is with mods, but we'll be getting those with this anyways.
Fallout 4 is coming baby!!!!
Also who cares about the visuals? They look plenty good enough, and Bethesda games have never been about graphics anyways. Well Skyrim is with mods, but we'll be getting those with this anyways.
Fallout 4 is coming baby!!!!
Yes please!Who wants on the Hype Train?
Because they don't have to focus on five systems. I think it's great, as it allows devs to make the best use of the newer systems.
KZ:SF was great. The Order was awful.
TW3, the current open RPG is better than this reveal trailer.
Why don't you mention that?
BB has a better graphic engine than FO4 trailer...Are we looking at the same plastic looking dog?
pls stop, it's embarrassing
Thanks, I've watched the vid a few times and people are taking janky frames or something. Thought the hand looked fine.
daninthemix
Member
This "problem" you speak of results in tens of millions of sales, glowing 9s and 10s in the critical press and many, many delighted gamers like myself.
Windom Earle
Member
The game will look and animate like shit. And it will be downgraded. And I will still love it.
threelights
Member
Looks good!
I wish there wasn't a dog though, I'm going to spend way too long with him =X
I wish there wasn't a dog though, I'm going to spend way too long with him =X
So you're saying it looks good compared to a 7 year old game?
DrROBschiz
Member
They aren't BAD the are just below the Bar thats been set for this gen, even by open world Standards
How far below the bar is it? Not as far as some of you claim thats for damn sure
dead monkey uk
Member
Yeah Fallout 3 was no looker but I still put 100 hours into it and the DLC. I think this new game will be the same for me. The gameplay montage in the trailer looked great, looking forward to seeing more at E3.
Fushichou187
Member
Fallout is VATS. If that's not your thing, cool, but that's what the game is. It'll be nice if they've improved some of the shooting mechanics but I wouldn't hold your breath.
TES with guns is a good starting point. If you like that idea and the setting they're going for, you'd probably like it. If you can play FO3 and F:NV I would totally do that as well. Both are fun.
Jelly Rajah
Banned
jasminlovesyoux
Banned
Just to clarify guys, all of my opinions are based on this trailer this morning and nothing else, because there is nothing else to talk about in regards to fallout 4. Trailers are made to generate hype and portray whatever goal they had in mind.
This reveal trailer was meant to show us what fallout looks like in the new generation. It's showing us what we remember from fallout 3 and what that looks like now. Nothing new. For that it did is job. For me I wanted something brand new. I over hyped myself and thought I'd see something spectacular today.
This reveal trailer was meant to show us what fallout looks like in the new generation. It's showing us what we remember from fallout 3 and what that looks like now. Nothing new. For that it did is job. For me I wanted something brand new. I over hyped myself and thought I'd see something spectacular today.
That's because Dying Light has options. Kicks, throws, parkour, etc. all added to the experience. Plus the sound design helped add some weight to the swings
