• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Faster evolving Tech than Video games?

Are video games evolving much faster than any other tech out there,
will the tech leap eventually become less and less noticeable?



WhZmg0p.jpg

I know it all boils down to how fast computers have evolved,
but I guess video games came in much later than movies.
Those 6 pixels basketball players sure have come along way.
 

mrqs

Member
The golden age of video-games will be when graphics will not have where to evolve anymore. The focus will be just to make a great game, great art etc.
 

c0de

Member
Is arm the better cpu and will overtake x86 in a few years in terms of performance? I mean, look at what happened in the last five years?
Answer is no, it probably won't. There is a certain natural “barrier“ they will get at (and we are already seeing it).
What does this have to do with the topic? Yes, it is evolving fast. But we already know the barrier and devs know them, too. Professional rendering takes several computing hours, games have to render frames in milliseconds. Devs are trying to make complex algorithms go fast and to fake what's computational expensive and often they do a good job with it. But we still don't have toy story level (although effects wise games can look better, for sure).
 
I think video game tech is still incredibly crude and primitive.

Everything you see in a game is still just a wireframe with a texture canvas covering it... (if you're lucky and it's not just a sprite)As shallow and hollow a rendition of reality as a balloon animal.

Shadows, lighting, reflections are nothing but (very) crude hacked together approximations of the real thing rather than simulations.

And on top of that each game is still super narrow in their scope like a shoebox diorama and only allow very very limited (and 99 percent faked) interaction with what is there.

Things like wind, water, smoke, fire etc are still not simulated in games and still can't be interacted with in any meaningful way.

We're not even 1 percent of the way there to have virtual 'reality'.

edit :and if you want to compare it to the movie industry
Games makers are so hopelessly behind when it comes to story telling, story pacing (a huge problem in games) and camera directing.
Movies from 40 years ago were doing wayyyyyyyy cooler things and way more interesting shots than even the best 'cinematic' games today.
And if you let a game developer near visual cinematic effects like vingetting, color grading, dof etc then they still behave like a toddler playing pretend and copying what he thinks daddy does at his job.
 

Shig

Strap on your hooker ...
Memory?

In 1980, the most popular home PC came with 20kb of storage.
In 2015, an entry level laptop or desktop comes with 500GB; over 4 billion times the storage capacity.

The 2015 example also costs significantly less to the consumer before even factoring in inflation.
 

Synth

Member
Isn't this question hampered by the fact that most sufficiently advanced tech would then be used for games? Like mobile phones.
 
Military tech. The military and the contractors they work with have technology we won't likely even get a whiff of for another 30 or 40 years, if at all. Look at our federal budget and how it's proportioned, and look at the level of tech just in relation to what's already public knowledge.
 

krang

Member
Military tech. The military and the contractors they work with have technology we won't likely even get a whiff of for another 30 or 40 years, if at all. Look at our federal budget and how it's proportioned, and look at the level of tech just in relation to what's already public knowledge.

Military tech tends to stand still when in-service, and often only be upgraded every 20+ years. But DARPA is a good yardstick for military tech development behind-the-scenes.
 

Falk

that puzzling face
We have bidets and toilet paper

Cost me a pretty penny and asking like 3 different plumbers to get a simple shower-head type bidet installed in my apartment in Boston. :|

THEY ALL LOOKED AT ME FUNNY.
 

Soupy

Banned
Cost me a pretty penny and asking like 3 different plumbers to get a simple shower-head type bidet installed in my apartment in Boston. :|

THEY ALL LOOKED AT ME FUNNY.

Complains about the USA...Lives in the USA.
 

Falk

that puzzling face
I prefer a toilet paper and flushable baby wipe combo myself.

But Japan's toilets are much more efficient than a bidet.

140401_TECH_TotoToilet_3.jpg.CROP.original-original.jpg

Those have also basically come to be called bidets, or electronic bidets, or combination bidets, and actually what I was referring to hahahah.

I don't even know what a bidet is. Does it actually flush you in the asshole?

This has become quite the awkward tangent!
 
You might save mobile phones - but the reception on mobile phones is fucking atrocious. The amount of disconnections, interference and drop-outs is ridiculous. The sound quality is generally for shit too. Good old fashioned telephony was much better tech. Sure smartphones are pocket PCs, but the telephony side is absolute trash.
 

Soupy

Banned
Those have also basically come to be called bidets, or electronic bidets, or combination bidets, and actually what I was referring to hahahah.

Exactly, but they are combined with the toilet foot print to be more space efficient. Plus dem heated toilet seats. Mmmmmm
 

Falk

that puzzling face
Screw that tiny bidet. We use water gun to wash our butt

The only issue I have with the shower-head style of bidet is the lever you depress tends to break after a few months. Replacing them repeatedly gets really old.

Maybe someone will invent a titanium or ordered-carbon shower-head bidet lever and they'll stop breaking. Definitely would put that bidet tech advancement rate ahead of video game development advancement rate.

Come on guys........*SIGH*
how did topic become waste matter discharged from the bowels after food has been digested?

THINK HAPPY THOUGHTS MAN. DD ON PC!!
 

Hexa

Member
New York in 1976 had support for 540 subscribers across 6 channels with a 10% blocking chance.
New York today supports 7.5+mil subscribers with negligible blocking chance due to statistical multiplexing.
 
Top Bottom