• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Now that all the major players are known, are you sold on VR for this generation?

Are you sold on getting a VR headset this generation?


Results are only viewable after voting.

Trey

Member
I'll let the day oners walk through the flames and provide feedback to be used toward the better specced and lower priced amended edition I'm going to buy.
 

Walpurgis

Banned
I'm sold on VR as a platform and would feel comfortable in investing in it but it is waaaaaaay out of my price range. I hope to experience it at Best Buy when they get demo stations. Otherwise, I won't buy one before the middle of next gen.
 

Sanctuary

Member
However, 100% of all mid to high end TV's have 3D now. Whether it is active or passive. So it did not go away. It is there for people to use.

3D implementation in modern TVs is declining drastically compared to the big push for it over the previous five years. I'm not really sure what your point is either regarding what I was talking about. We now have the ability to have it in our homes, so it might be able to reach more people for longer periods of time, but that doesn't mean it's going to last. Quite frankly, most of the people that I know that own 3D TVs only ever use them for a select few Blu-rays, and even then they still don't use them for that very often.

Feeling dumb. I edited my post. Thanks senior grammar nazi.

Couldn't help it, sorry. That's really the only thing I bother commenting on too.
 
I keep almost pulling the trigger on a pre-order but I think I'm going to wait. The games and experiences releasing for VR headsets are only minigames or stuff I'd buy to justify my purchase but end up unsatisfied with.

And then it has not been revealed if the Oculus Rift can do roomscale as well as the Vive (I don't give a damn about Palmer's PR posts, I need to see it demonstrated) and I can't buy a Vive because the Oculus Touch controllers look way better to me.

And even if the content was there I would be too torn on which headset to buy so I will try to wait it out for at least a year. I'm not mad anymore about Oculus funding games, go ahead and make some AAA ones with all that Facebook money to make my decision easier.
 

ArjanN

Member
It seems neat to goof around with for a bit, but I kinda think it'll be a couple of years before there's anything really compelling games-wise.

The tech is only going to get better and cheaper as well anyway so IMO there's no reason to wait until it's further along unless you're a tech nut willing to pay a lot.
 

Oneself

Member
PSVR is interesting since I don't have a gaming PC but the price is a little to much for my poor Canadian wallet.

Considering the headset alone is 550$, a bundle with move and the PS camera will probably be around 650-700$... I prefer spending that money towards great non-vr PS4 titles instead TBH.
 

Krisprolls

Banned
I'm sold on PSVR. It's affordable and it has the PS4 user base so it will have all the big games too. Devs go where the money is and like always it will be on consoles.

I'm not sold on PC VR though. PC VR is probably too expensive to take off outside of a niche so they probably won't get big games and both Oculus and Vive could die relatively early outside of small games and indies.

I think we'll see VR fits closed systems like consoles better than PCs because you need to be 100% sure how the game will run in VR. You'll get sickness on some PCs and it will turn people off pretty fast even if PC VR managed to survive with a small installed base.

All the PC configuration / settings / drivers hassles are bothersome on normal games, but they're killing blows on VR games. I think this point is wildly underestimated.
 

LostDonkey

Member
However, 100% of all mid to high end TV's have 3D now. Whether it is active or passive. So it did not go away. It is there for people to use.


Er, what?

Not in the UK they don't. There are still many, many TV'S on the market that don't have any kind of 3d mode.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Er, what?

Not in the UK they don't. There are still many, many TV'S on the market that don't have any kind of 3d mode.

Strange, I walk into Best Buy here, and every mid to high end has 3D. The lower end/entry (sub $500 TV sets) usually do not.

They do not advertise as heavy, true, it just seems like a standard feature that has not disappeared. But there as an extra option.

I still think it is disingenuous to compare 3D TVs to VR.
 

Sanctuary

Member
Strange, I walk into Best Buy here, and every mid to high end has 3D. The lower end/entry (sub $500 TV sets) usually do not.

They do not advertise as heavy, true, it just seems like a standard feature that has not disappeared. But there as an extra option.

I still think it is disingenuous to compare 3D TVs to VR.

Only because you want to believe in VR so hard right now. Both times 3D was introduced, it was touted as a new and great experience unlike what you had previously seen. I'd argue that today's 3D is even less compelling than the silly stuff from the 80s too. At least the gimmick was persistent through the entire movie.

You do realize that having 3D on a TV is just a way to drive up prices right? That's the main reason so many of the mid to high end sets had it. You want a better picture? Here it is, but you also are going to pay for 3D, whether or not you are actually going to use it. Same reason it's slathered on top of so many movies that don't really benefit from it. Higher ticket costs.
 

Alebrije

Member
Nope but I wish good sales to all companies , ist a nice add to videogames but still expensive for a lot of peole.

Not all can afford current sets including the cheapest PSVR, but if the thechnology finds a way in the market surely will be cheaper by 2019-2020

But for the people that can afford I think is great, even the PSVR games look fine and got impressed by developers support on Sony's conference
 

Inbachi

Neo Member
Nope; it's too expensive and seems too gimmicky still. I hope they keep pushing it though and after a few more generations I'll take another look.
 

DSix

Banned
Preordered the PSVR because it's the only one I can realistically afford (in europe the Vive and Oculus prices are ridiculous).

But if any PC solution comes at a good price I might consider canceling the PSVR for it. I want to create my own stuff for it and I don't fancy being limited to a closed ecosystem for too long. I'm watching closely how the Razer OSVR is evolving, it might eventually become a good alternative at the 350€ price-point.

Otherwise I'll just wait for the 2nd PCVR generation to upgrade.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Only because you want to believe in VR so hard right now. Both times 3D was introduced, it was touted as a new and great experience unlike what you had previously seen. I'd argue that today's 3D is even less compelling than the silly stuff from the 80s too. At least the gimmick was persistent through the entire movie.

You do realize that having 3D on a TV is just a way to drive up prices right? That's the main reason so many of the mid to high end sets had it. You want a better picture? Here it is, but you also are going to pay for 3D, whether or not you are actually going to use it. Same reason it's slathered on top of so many movies that don't really benefit from it. Higher ticket costs.

Yes, I realize the 3D price thing. Sadly it does make for a better 2D picture.

And I do want to believe in VR, because from when I tried it in the 90's, to the solutions we have now... I always wanted an affordable home version, and it looks to be we are getting that. So don't piss in my Cheerios, lol.
 

MoonFrog

Member
I will not be getting into VR in the near future. I have neither a PS4 nor an optimal PC (although I do intend to upgrade components soon) for a VR device and beyond that I have little interest in the technology.

Maybe something will convince me it is "must have," but I'm assuming that'll be a generation or so removed if it happens.
 
Nope, even at 400 bucks the PSVR is still too expensive. Plus none of them are universal right? It's ridiculous, it'd be like having to buy a separate tv for each device. I'll be interested when there's a universal headset at like 200.
 

poodaddy

Member
Nope. Zero interest.

This here, save for horror games, but I'm still not sold on the premise in general yet. If I ever get to try one out at some point perhaps I'll change my tune; it does look interesting to say the least, but as I said I'm only interested in the horror game aspect of it.
 
Hoping to get PSVR at launch and one of the PC headsets but won't have a VR capable rig until early next year. I'll wait for consensus on whether to get the Vive or Occulus.
 
I feel like any answer other than "Let's wait and see" is premature at this point. I'm going to get a PSVR at launch, but I can't say I'm sold on it when I've not used it or played it's first wave of software in my home. Yes, we know the major players, yes some of us have had experience using VR, but we don't have all three available at retail for the general consumer and we don't have even the first major wave of software built specifically for VR.

When they're out, and we've all used it in our homes and have seen how it works in reality opposed to in theory, then this will be a much more interesting discussion.
 

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
its a large investment for a product that I'm not entirely sure will see enough use (time-wise) to justify the cost.

Not interested at the moment.
 

Naudi

Banned
I'll let the day oners walk through the flames and provide feedback to be used toward the better specced and lower priced amended edition I'm going to buy.

I'll let you buy the 2nd one so I can buy the 3rd even cheaper and betterest version.
 
vr-in-first-kids1omc.gif


Back in the 90s i was excited about VR

Now... not quite. Too expensive, im not digging the videos they showed until now

I'm not at all suggesting that this is a feasible option for your average consumer, but I'm getting an Omnidirectional treadmill for movement in VR.

Here's a quick video showing how it works with shoehorned functionality.

Imagine how cool it would be with a game designed from the ground up for it.

Virtuix Omni - Grand Theft Auto V: http://youtu.be/QZEnjwUqc4M

JOtK9Lo.gif


(Just want to reiterate again that this is not what everyone with a headset is going to go out and buy, just wanted to show you what that 90's tech looks like today :p)
 

lawnchair

Banned
(Just want to reiterate again that this is not what everyone with a headset is going to go out and buy, just wanted to show you what that 90's tech looks like today :p)

big plastic box on the head, check
big plastic gun, check
standing in a big plastic circle, check

looks pretty similar to me
 

Cathcart

Member
lol, "not currently." Sign me up for "will never give a shit."

I'll happily be the old man on this one. If every dev dropped everything today for VR forever I've got a backlog that can last the rest of my life. You kids have fun, bye.
 

Murugo

Member
As a hopeful VR developer, absolutely. But for a typical consumer I imagine that first-generation VR will be embraced mostly by enthusiasts or those with funds to spare.

In terms of content, I also understand waiting for the library of available games to expand. That's how Gear VR started out last year, and even though not much time has passed, the amount of worthwhile content is increasing rapidly.
 
big plastic box on the head, check
big plastic gun, check
standing in a big plastic circle, check

looks pretty similar to me

And I'm sure it works exactly the same.

Just like all modern VR headsets are 100% identical to Virtual Boy because technology never advances.

Thanks for showing your stupidity so people know not to take anything you say in the future seriously.
 
Not if they continue to show a plethora of gimmicky cartoony minigames that the PSVR folks have been demoing. Even RIGS looks like I'd get tired of fast. The "great" price of $399 would all of the sudden seem like a huge waste to me if they continue this trend.

Need some substance, good story, decent graphics (not asking for something photo-realistic that would only run on a 980ti).

I'd pay top dollar for the top of the line headset and a high end Pascal/Polaris card for something like....Alan Wake 2 VR in first person....would be incredible, a true VR experience.
 

AniHawk

Member
vr is the 8th console generation's cd add-on. i'll get on board when it's the focus of a platform instead of the new side project for c-teams.
 

Crayon

Member
I saw lawnmower man when I was a kid and it showed me how vr could rip lives apart. I was sold then and it's been a long wait.
 

Sakura

Member
I'm interested in VR as a concept, but I'm a poor Canadian, and I haven't seen any software that really sells the hardware for me. So I'm not quite sold on getting one just yet.
 

AndrewPL

Member
Good luck to everyone diving in! I get motion sick from fps games and 3d, I'll wait until it's proven, tech is better (60fps or higher) and there are must play experiences.
 

RMI

Banned
I'll wait to see if it makes it to a second generation. I'd rather be a late adopter to a healthy platform than early to one that doesn't go anywhere.
 

lawnchair

Banned
And I'm sure it works exactly the same.

Just like all modern VR headsets are 100% identical to Virtual Boy because technology never advances.

Thanks for showing your stupidity so people know not to take anything you say in the future seriously.

i see this is a very sensitive issue for you, sorry if i got your blood pressure up
 
Got to try DK2. Even with the screen door, and lack of motion controls I could get a sense of presence. I'm totally sold on VR being a big part of the future of gaming.

PC isn't good enough.
But I have PS4 as well as all the other gear, so I've pre-ordered PSVR. Sad that I have to wait til October though.
 
Top Bottom