• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

A polite discourse amongst friends on the importance of MP-elements in No Man's Sky

Status
Not open for further replies.
The whole "extremely rare" talking point is extremely annoying and irrelevant. Yes it's extremely rare to COINCIDENTALLY encounter another player, but when you can name star systems and individual locations on the planet surface and have access to ships that can easily traverse the universe, it's not all that difficult.

But no one is asking that. We just want a simple yes or no if it's possible to see another player. Not interact with them, but simply see them.
 

Zyae

Member
What is? That this has online? It does, your discoveries are shared online. That it's single player? Yes, you're right, it's right there on the box.

Why did they cover it up then?


murray2e0up8.gif
 

Bytes

Member

Sean said for years that this game had multiplayer functionality where you can see other players and play with your friends, and then he tweets that this is a single player game mere hours before the game release and that means we were all stupid for expecting multiplayer functionality?

I honestly don't get this logic.
 

DOWN

Banned
He's avoiding saying the feature he touted over and over is or isn't present though. We always knew encounters should be rare, but the fact was still stated that there is player encounters. He is trying to run away from that without being definitive about his claims.
 
We don't

When Dark Souls launched on PC my friends couldnt see my soul sign even though I placed it down on the ground and they were at the same spot

Turns out there was a bunch of things that came into play like NAT type, instancing, level restrictions etc as well as the game just being bugged but it never meant it wasn't possible. Just excruciatingly difficult

This is exactly what it reminds me of.

Meanwhile, folks are going to turn this into a shitstorm regardless, because that's what we do here when we're bored.

If it's singleplayer, it's still an awesome singleplayer game.
 

TimFL

Member
Well damn, you have no idea how much time I spent using Waybackmachine to find that.

....

Found it.
K5jewgp.jpg


Got a backup, just in case this magically disappears somehow (like ALL the other goddamn links I found to "PS UK magazine Online mode confirmed" screencaps..).
 
These two guys are trying to meet again but now the system they are in one of them already named, the second guy is getting discoveries for finding it.

So the planet they are trying to meet on has a different name for each of them.
 

Najaf

Member
the two streamers are right now trying to meet up again. they are in the same spot again

http://multitwitch.tv/psytokat/thesadcactus

right now, the planets are discovered by both of them by themselves respectively.
I guess it doesn't update very often.

This is the thing that gets me. Sean knew the streamers were trying every which way to see each other yesterday. It would have been as simple as saying "Guys, your're wasting your time. You can't see other players." But no, he's got to keep it all vague and inconclusive despite the flood of repeated questions in his twitter feed and across Reddit/GAF etc..
 

Klyka

Banned
Now some people are saying the game might have regional servers because not both of the streamers are in the US XD

Is thesadcactus online? I only see psytokat broadcasting at the moment.

He is online but not streaming right now cause he has to go in a bit as he said.
Not sure why that keeps him from streaming, but....

Also their system and planet names are now syncd apparently.
 
Is it possible that the universe in NMS isn't as big as they say it is? I mean, the chances of two players running into each other in a universe as big as they say should basically be zero...but it happened within 10 hours of the game releasing? I mean, I guess anything is possible - but is it also possible that it isn't 18 quintillion planets in size?
Because I'm assuming they coordinated this and weren't just aimlessly wondering and happened to bump into each other.
 

OCD Guy

Member
I love that 18 quintillion planets thing.

The galaxy you are in does not have 18 quintillion planets.

There is a certain amount of planets in a galaxy out of the maximum possible procedurally generated number of 18 quintillion.

Already on reddit there are 3 other threads about people having found already discovered planets next to their start and trying to contact the players to try a meet up.

Regardless of the exact number, it was explicitly stated that the universe is so large the chances of meeting someone else was practically zero, especially as players would likely all start at the edge of the galaxy millions of miles away from other players.

Now it turns out the universe isn't so large, and players are all within a few planets from eachother.

To top it off because it was possible to generate 18 quintillion planets the chances of two players seeing the exact same thing was rare, and Sean even commented that there have been 10 million different species discovered in one day, yet players are seeing the exact same animals....
 
Didn't this start from one of them seeing the PSN of the player who named the planet he was on, messaging him, and them meeting up on the planet?

Did they just become friends?

I think so! And thousands of people watching it live. Quite the social experience for a game with no multiplayer.
 
I love all the people claiming they won't buy it now because you MIGHT not be able to see one another. The game has over 18 quintillion planets.

Do any of you even realize how big that is? 18 quintillion is:

18,000,000,000,000,000,000

divide that by a million players all online at the same time and your odds of running into someone are:

1 in 18,000,000,000 Billion

Now, yes, two people seem to have found each other somehow, that doesn't change the fact that up until now it should have been seen as such a REMOTE possibility that buying the game in the hopes it would happen just seems incredibly foolish.

On the other hand, seeing that it is now possible, I can see people getting upset that you can't see one another (apparently), but nothing leading up to this should have given you the impression that you would be playing this game for a few months and probably find someone.

It's not a 1 in 18 quintillion chance.

Even assuming there are 18 quintillion planets in the galaxy where you start, you can't potentially spawn at any of them. Some people would spawn next to the center and make one single jump and beat the game. Yawn.

No, everyone probably spawns the same radius away from the center of the galaxy, and on planets deemed survivable for newbies. Much, much fewer valid spawn points than you're implying.

If there are 100 million possible starting planets, and 1 million people are playing the game, then on average players will start out 100 planets apart from each other. Some much further, some much closer.

And couple that with the fact that everyone is trying to get to the same center, and it starts to look pretty damn likely that people are going to be able to meet up.

And it turns out that they did. The comments about it being rare/impossible were a gross misrepresentation.
 
There is mp. Online functions worked the same for everyone.
"There is mp" is not an answer. It's a pretty easy question: can or can you not seek out other players and see them?

Nobody at the moment knows. And it can be cleared up with a simple yes or no from the developer.
 

Kssio_Aug

Member
The only issue up for discussion is why we can't see one another in the game at the moment.

That's all Sean has to answer for.

We ARE playing together, with our friends, online, in separate instances within the same galaxy-server. Sean has never lied about that fact. And that falls under the "Online" stickers on the boxes.

Too many of you are inflating this into a bigger issue than it is.

Cherry-picked videos with VG Show Hosts making statements that Sean doesn't immediately debunk does not mean shit.

Yeah, of course. That said, nowadays every game has multiplayer, after all, we're all playing and discussing it together, right??

Come on, there's no need to imply things to defend a developer. He can do it himself just explaining the whole situation loud and clear on twitter, YouTube, his webpage, Reddit, here on NeoGAF, or wherever fits him better.
 

platocplx

Member
Yeah but that's new and those other videos are old.
Right why do people go by old information is literally 2 days ago that is what the guy said. Ive never even thought of this game as being multiplayer. I just dont understand where all of this was lost in translation.
 

labx

Banned
All that critical players here want is the possibility of seeing other players in the game - no matter how small the chance is. You know, the thing what was talked about multiple times by the developer.

Also, I believe Sean was intentionally obtuse and vague in many interviews to not crush the dreams that players are projecting into the game and leave the idea of MP open to interpretation.

For example, in the interview, which was posted on the last couple of pages, he gets asked about the MP. He first wants to say "it is not a f ... (eature)" but quickly corrects himself and says "no that's not what the game is about". That leaves the door open to players interpreting this as the game not being focussed on MP but still incorporates those features that he talked about in earlier interviews (the very rare occasions of players seeing each other).

100% Agree, the game have flaws, it not the second coming of jesus. But the critical players maybe are being hasty about this feature? The critical players would be happy if MP is a lá Dark Souls with blueprints of the player? Maybe they are things that critical players don't know yet about the game? Don't know.
 

213372bu

Banned
By not seeking out and expecting endless exploring with your buddies.

What's that have to do with anything?

He either said something is in the game and it is or he lied.

Just like Fable 1, 2, and 3. Just like Spore.

Create a cult of personality around a videogame dev to the point where you ignore really basic points.

Can't wait for the NMS brand Kool-Aid!
 
There is mp. Online functions worked the same for everyone.

Can you elaborate?

Earlier you said these:

Bunch of damn grown ass babies on the internet. It's sad and pathetic how people are treating this.

Servers are down but it don't matter. Better cause a shit storm because two other random ass people tried to meet up when the online servers weren't up. hurr durr

Fucking pathetic

So the last update in that reddit thread says they finally met up. So it works.

Why is this still a thread? Time to close this shit hole.

"I was so nervous when I found another player I was barely able to function but we did it! Me and Psytokat beat the odds and found each other already!"

Sounds pretty cut and dry
 

His messaging is poor and that's the problem multiple interviews until one in May said otherwise.

Then he goes on Twitter and is being odd about the word "meet".

Me personally isn't saying he is lying right now, just that his messaging is poor as hell.

Sean said for years that this game had multiplayer functionality where you can see other players and play with your friends, and then he tweets that this is a single player game mere hours before the game release and that means we were all stupid for expecting multiplayer functionality?

I honestly don't get this logic.

Pretty much.

Can you elaborate?

Earlier you said these:

Lmao.
 
These two guys are trying to meet again but now the system they are in one of them already named, the second guy is getting discoveries for finding it.

So the planet they are trying to meet on has a different name for each of them.

I am trying to figure out what's happening. The title of the stream is "Getting warp fuel to get back to sadcactus"

Last night one of them jumped and didn't have enough to get back.

The naming stuff is linked to online too so if they were offline when they named stuff last night, maybe their data didn't upload.
 

Kinyou

Member
I still can't believe some of you expected a 18 quintillion planets wide MMO.
At which number does multiplayer become realistic again to you? 400 billion star systems? That's how much Elite Dangerous has.
Two players meeting up wouldn't make it an mmo
 

Pop

Member
"There is mp" is not an answer. It's a pretty easy question: can or can you not seek out other players and see them?

Nobody at the moment knows. And it can be cleared up with a simple yes or no from the developer.

So if nobody knows then why is this thread still up?
 

The_Dama

Member
Why are people still defending or claiming "we don't know yet"?

It's simple. Game does NOT have any kind of MP. The only thing that's "online" is uploading your own planet and discovering other planets uploaded by others.
 

Tagyhag

Member
This is exactly what it reminds me of. I'm sure we'll figure out the truth in due time.

Meanwhile, folks are going to turn this into a shitstorm regardless, because that's what we do here when we're bored.

You know how this wouldn't be a shit storm? Two ways:

1. Months in advance before the game came out: "You can NOT see other players, you will NEVER know what you look like. The only interaction you'll have with other players is naming things"

2. Yesterday on Twitter: "People, there is NO player to player direction interaction, we couldn't end up doing it. You can NOT see each other in game, only interaction is naming things"

Apparently, people are entitled for expecting clear messaging for games they paid $60 for.

The shilling is real.
 
Sean said for years that this game had multiplayer functionality where you can see other players and play with your friends, and then he tweets that this is a single player game mere hours before the game release and that means we were all stupid for expecting multiplayer functionality?

I honestly don't get this logic.

In one interview he said you can meet up with your friends. That's technically true but highly improbable though. He was asked to give a yes or no answer to a question that is a lot more complicated.

It's remarkable how many of us knew very early on what type of experience this was yet people keep showing up claiming they were sold on this being a multiplayer game and that you could meet up and play with your friends like it was a regular thing.
 

TheExodu5

Banned
I don't see how players could possible meet. From a technical standpoint, it would be an absolutely massive undertaking.

Planets need to be hosted locally. There's no way they can afford to host millions of server instances for a game that is 99.9% single player according to probabilities.

I would assume that each planet discovery gets saved server side and the local instance synchronizes with the server at some point. But how much data actually synchronizes? Probably just basic things such as species names. If be surprised if terrain deformation is synchronized because then all of that data would have to be stored server side.

Can you imagine how much data it would take to store millions of planet sized instances complete with terrain deformation? I don't even think Petabytes of storage would be enough.

Logic tells me that planets are simply stored as a random seed which is used by the local client to generate the actual instance. Beyond that, only basic things such as species names are stored server side.
 

diablos991

Can’t stump the diablos
Right why do people go by old information is literally 2 days ago that is what the guy said. Ive never even thought of this game as being multiplayer. I just dont understand where all of this was lost in translation.

So it's perfectly reasonable to drum up hype and preorders by telling multiplayer lies as long as you tell the truth in a tweet 4 days before release?
 

KoopaTheCasual

Junior Member
Nitpicking? Worlds collide? Crazy expectations? Players idea?

Wut?

Again: Sean Murray himself described the rudimentary MP functionality of players meeting and seeing each other in various interviews. Just yesterday he tweeted "Holy shit two players found each other".

This is not something that players projected into the game. It was announced and marketed by the developers themselves. It doesn't matter how important or unimportant this feature is to each individual player. The issue is their deceitful communication.
A short aside:

This reminds me very much of the Destiny "you see those mountains? you can go there" debacle. People were linking interviews about overstated promises/features, and the reality of what was released. The defense on Gaf was also verrry similar. It was also along the lines of "things change in game development," or "it's not even a big deal, why do you even care? get over it" or "I don't see how that's dishonest/shady."

It's weird that some gamers go through such lengths to defend a game they like. You can love a game and be critical of the devs behind it. It's not hard. And just like Destiny, this comes down to a lack of communication up until launch.
 

Gamezone

Gold Member
He said in interviews that players could kill each other. He also said that we could see other players, but he was pretty clear that the possibility was next to zero. He probably thought people wouldn't get the ability to try this in such a massive universe. Now people have caught him lying, and he simply refuses to give us a straight answer, and he probably won't. This shouldn't go unnoticed by the community.
 

xealo

Member
Yeah but that's new and those other videos are old.

The problem with why it's unclear isn't even about that being new and those videos old, but also that he tweeted this just 2 minutes after that one: https://twitter.com/NoMansSky/status/762689080245252096

Those two combined can be interpreted as him saying it's not a multiplayer experience because players are unlikely to find one another.
I'm not saying he's lying, but he do needs to sharpen up a bit in how to deliver messages that aren't open to interpretation.
 
So if nobody knows then why is this thread still up?
Because the fact that nobody knows is a problem. People would like it answered. If the developers just put a quick Tweet online with it, then it is over. But they don't for some reason.

Earlier in this thread you said it is there. Now you say it isn't. So what do you think actually?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom