Well, it's very likely AMD never said that.
Sure they did. AMD CEO said it during investor briefing I believe. First random link off google.Well, it's very likely AMD never said that.
I think zen is promising
Will well be worth it if they are 20% or so lower than Intel
You're right, the CEO did.
Edit: In a conference call.
People not seeing the forest for the trees.
$1100 6900k 140W 8C/16T 3.2GHZ/3.7GHZ Boost is being matched by the 95W 8C/16T 3.4GHZ RyZen.
Regardless of their poor demos, this should be the real take away. There will be competition in the CPU market after over half a decade of intel dominance.
Now, it is too bad there is no pricing yet, but it confirmed to be less than 4 months away. Q1 release.
Obviously, this is new architecture for AMD meaning new board.So I need a new motherboard and cooler for this? Great...
People not seeing the forest for the trees.
$1100 6900k 140W 8C/16T 3.2GHZ/3.7GHZ Boost is being matched by the 95W 8C/16T 3.4GHZ RyZen.
Regardless of their poor demos, this should be the real take away. There will be competition in the CPU market after over half a decade of intel dominance.
Now, it is too bad there is no pricing yet, but it is confirmed to be less than 4 months away. Q1 release.
That is great for sure. Price and availability will be key Also, Intel could cut pricing of that chip to $600-$700 tomorrow and not even blink so hopefully AMD has its ducks in order but certainly if everything as great as shown they will force Intel to blink... especially if they get the server components right.People not seeing the forest for the trees.
$1100 6900k 140W 8C/16T 3.2GHZ/3.7GHZ Boost is being matched by the 95W 8C/16T 3.4GHZ RyZen.
Regardless of their poor demos, this should be the real take away. There will be competition in the CPU market after over half a decade of intel dominance.
Now, it is too bad there is no pricing yet, but it confirmed to be less than 4 months away. Q1 release.
Pretty much, and CES is right around the corner so of course they won't announce price here. CES is where a lot of new notebooks will be revealed.People not seeing the forest for the trees.
$1100 6900k 140W 8C/16T 3.2GHZ/3.7GHZ Boost is being matched by the 95W 8C/16T 3.4GHZ RyZen.
Regardless of their poor demos, this should be the real take away. There will be competition in the CPU market after over half a decade of intel dominance.
Now, it is too bad there is no pricing yet, but it is confirmed to be less than 4 months away. Q1 release.
I'd love to see them undercut and really drive Intel to compete again.My gut tells me old habits die hard and Intel, like AMD, is a competitive companywhich means an 8-core Zen at a disruptive place is a likely course (though maybe not as low as some of the rumors suggest). Witness the aggressive $200 MSRP of the Radeon RX 480 as AMD battles Nvidia for graphical supremacy for precedent.
People not seeing the forest for the trees.
$1100 6900k 140W 8C/16T 3.2GHZ/3.7GHZ Boost is being matched by the 95W 8C/16T 3.4GHZ RyZen.
Regardless of their poor demos, this should be the real take away. There will be competition in the CPU market after over half a decade of intel dominance.
Now, it is too bad there is no pricing yet, but it is confirmed to be less than 4 months away. Q1 release.
People not seeing the forest for the trees.
$1100 6900k 140W 8C/16T 3.2GHZ/3.7GHZ Boost is being matched by the 95W 8C/16T 3.4GHZ RyZen.
Regardless of their poor demos, this should be the real take away. There will be competition in the CPU market after over half a decade of intel dominance.
Now, it is too bad there is no pricing yet, but it is confirmed to be less than 4 months away. Q1 release.
Oh, people are surely seeing the forest, alright. It's just the junior-high 'gang-on' mentality that prevails on anonymous message boards.People not seeing the forest for the trees.
$1100 6900k 140W 8C/16T 3.2GHZ/3.7GHZ Boost is being matched by the 95W 8C/16T 3.4GHZ RyZen.
Regardless of their poor demos, this should be the real take away. There will be competition in the CPU market after over half a decade of intel dominance.
Now, it is too bad there is no pricing yet, but it is confirmed to be less than 4 months away. Q1 release.
People not seeing the forest for the trees.
$1100 6900k 140W 8C/16T 3.2GHZ/3.7GHZ Boost is being matched by the 95W 8C/16T 3.4GHZ RyZen.
Regardless of their poor demos, this should be the real take away. There will be competition in the CPU market after over half a decade of intel dominance.
Now, it is too bad there is no pricing yet, but it is confirmed to be less than 4 months away. Q1 release.
I'd love to go all AMD come next year and finally retire my trusty 2500k though.
In 2 handpicked number-crunching benchmarks.
When they went to games they didn't show numbers and showed a very specific use-case in streaming Dota and compared it against a 4 core Intel cpu - i wonder why ...
Also, Lisa said Ryzen will START at 3.4GHz, so there's no way their cheapest CPU starts even close to $1k.
Why even change the name to Ryzen? Zen was fine.
I'd wait for benchmarks.
In 2 handpicked number-crunching benchmarks.
When they went to games they didn't show numbers and showed a very specific use-case in streaming Dota and compared it against a 4 core Intel cpu - i wonder why ...
That is great for sure. Price and availability will be key Also, Intel could cut pricing of that chip to $600-$700 tomorrow and not even blink so hopefully AMD has its ducks in order but certainly if everything as great as shown they will force Intel to blink... especially if they get the server components right.
No price, so I remain skeptical. If they could perform better at a lower wattage than the 1100 bucks Intel... they would scream it off the rooftops if they had a lower price. Something tells me that in Europe it is the same crap as with the RX480. The Geforce GTX 1060 is just a better card for a lower price .
Colour me (an AMD Fan) sceptical... until they announce a price.
If this is really 400 bucks as leaks suggest than its gonna be fun.
well hopefully they will price it for $600 and start some competition going... but yeah, thats not how it works. Intel has to maximize their profits to please its investors (and lately they are not pleased), so Intel is not going to run AMD out of business by underpricing their cpu's.
But with this tdp, which is basically 6700k range, looks like AMD will provide some serious competition for Intel by the time 2017 finishes.
if they it and can do same kind of thing with vega, i will gladly come back to full amd next year on a new rig.
That is great for sure. Price and availability will be key Also, Intel could cut pricing of that chip to $600-$700 tomorrow and not even blink so hopefully AMD has its ducks in order but certainly if everything as great as shown they will force Intel to blink... especially if they get the server components right.