Shani...
Or SHAUNI??
It's specifically Shani not Shauni
Shani...
Or SHAUNI??
It's still not an unreasonable expectation - especially given the game in question. If so much is changed, why then even call it BG&E? Just to cash in on the old fans hopes and dreams? Why create such a story driven, linear progression trailer, if the game is not going to be anything like that?
This is almost Federation Force levels of not listening to your fanbase and strongest supporters.
Swearing matched the tone of this trailer perfectly.
I don't understand why people get so hung up on it, either.
People act like swearing implies that something is dumb. While I see that point of view, it can also imply that it's aiming at an older audience, which means it should respect my intelligence more than, say, the usual Mario game plot aimed at toddlers. It's a good message to send when the game stars anthropomorphic animals, and could otherwise be a baby game.
Sigh. Nothing says mature like anthropomorphic animals cursing.
Amen. Summarized my feelings exactly. If this game turns out as shown, it's a definite no buy from me.
I'm looking forward to Jade's glorious return in 2030.
People keep saying it's looks nothing like BGE, but there was a moment in the trailer where I started thinking, "what ELSE could this be, given that it's Ubisoft? They can't have another IP with talking animals, that technology, and futuristic setting crossed with familiar but locales"
Be prepared for disappointment.
Ubisoft's Switch support at the conference started with a Mario title and ended with a Toys to Life title with nothing in between.
Nothing else is coming to Switch. No South Park. No Far Cry. No Assassins Creed.
It's so hard to tell without ANY gameplay (thanks UB) but it all feels weird.
I know some people love this game but it's 14 years later and 6 years after they did a remaster to get interest. I'm sure most of the fans would rather they move it forward in story, not back but if enough people didn't play it, would they care about the story?
They tried very hard to set up a massive world that just doesn't feel like it matches the tone or scope or feel of the first one.
I didn't even love the first, but I can recognize the massive disconnect.
With THAT trailer (pigman and green eyes aside) you could have set up a NEW crazy awesome game universe. So strange
People keep saying it's looks nothing like BGE, but there was a moment in the trailer where I started thinking, "what ELSE could this be, given that it's Ubisoft? They can't have another IP with talking animals, that technology, and futuristic setting crossed with familiar but locales"
I'm not talking about open world framework, I mean a tight focused SP campaign. Open world or not.
If it's not heavily implied online framework such as working up from a lowly pirate to a legendary and seamless online world. It does bring up doubts how focused SP would be.
You can have a game like this with a huge story focus. Just look at Final Fantasy XIV as an example, or even some of the cutscenes in GTA Online for one of the earlier attempts at that.
People keep saying it's looks nothing like BGE, but there was a moment in the trailer where I started thinking, "what ELSE could this be, given that it's Ubisoft? They can't have another IP with talking animals, that technology, and futuristic setting crossed with familiar but locales"
People keep saying it's looks nothing like BGE, but there was a moment in the trailer where I started thinking, "what ELSE could this be, given that it's Ubisoft? They can't have another IP with talking animals, that technology, and futuristic setting crossed with familiar but locales"
Trailer looked phenomenal and all but please someone enlighten me on why are we supposed to get so excited over a CGI trailer?
What supporters? I'm a BGE fan, I was waiting for BGE2, and I think this trailer was brilliant and the art style significantly better and more original than whatever they had in BGE1.Alright, I'll admit that's a very slight exaggeration.
If they were further along in the project maybe less so, but right now they're so early in pre production that they're still gathering feedback.
Maybe there's a chance yet to get that proper, single player focused game supporters wanted?
I've uh, heard rumblings they were very impressed with how much hype and success Star Wars Episode VII had.
Trailer looked phenomenal and all but please someone enlighten me on why are we supposed to get so excited over a CGI trailer?
We really don't know, since there's really no gameplay to reference right now. It's got talking animals and a rather ethnically diverse group of human characters, so yes on that front?
NOPE.
Because it doesn't match the tone of the first and only game in the series at all.
This is Bomberman Zero level of IP fuckery.
Trailer looked phenomenal and all but please someone enlighten me on why are we supposed to get so excited over a CGI trailer?
People keep saying it's looks nothing like BGE, but there was a moment in the trailer where I started thinking, "what ELSE could this be, given that it's Ubisoft? They can't have another IP with talking animals, that technology, and futuristic setting crossed with familiar but locales"
Sigh. Nothing says mature like anthropomorphic animals cursing.
I think it's an improvement.Because it doesn't match the tone of the first and only game in the series at all.
This is Bomberman Zero level of IP fuckery.
That's just how it looks like to me so far. It could be different when new information pops up in the near future.I mean, you could say that Alloy started out as a lowly outcast and rose to a.legendary religious avatar
Online can work if it still allows player self determination. Drop in/drop out co-op for example where friends just replace the AI bots but everyone enjoys the narrative together.
The narrative director was a writer for Valiant Hearts and apparently involved enough in this project to be on-stage next to Ancel. You don't put someone unrecognizable to the public on stage like that if their contribution isn't significant.