Fuz
Banned
This is the correct answer.What new film? The series ended with last crusade.
This is the correct answer.What new film? The series ended with last crusade.
Well, that would change the meaning of nuking the fridge.I heard they are renaming the character to Bridget Jones.
Still one can argue that this was created by somebody else to actually bring the guy down. It's quite obvious that DC is cringe material, But this seems like a stretch to discredit content that they don't like.. Not based on its merit but rather come in at its sideways through conspiracy theoriesThe longer video is pretty convincing, especially when they compare the voices and how they both pronounce things the same and the near identical nature to the scripts. There some other stuff in the video such as comparing when and how the channels were setup and the production similarities.
Still one can argue that this was created by somebody else to actually bring the guy down. It's quite obvious that DC is cringe material, But this seems like a stretch to discredit content that they don't like.. Not based on its merit but rather come in at its sideways through conspiracy theories
It's also a bit on the nose though. So this guy decided to create a new persona but didn't bother to change his mannerisms and voice?It's a crazy conspiracy if someone is able to mimic someone else to the point of copying their body language, speech patterns, cadences, and voice just to bring down someone on YouTube.
If these reports are factual the sad part is the continuing lack of inspiration. Making the same shit over again with a different character is just the same thing as before with a minor change. Why can’t they actually make something new and entertaining? It doesn’t have to try and set up a passing of the torch like Crystal Skull tried and failed at, just needs to be a simple story with character development, an obstacle to overcome, and some resolution to the story while being cohesive throughout the storytelling using an already established and beloved character. Shit ain’t rocket science
Because it isn't about creating something new for these people. It's about tearing stuff down and taking things away from those who care about them.I always suspect any source that’s mostly all politics and no information of substance injected into its content from either side. It’s the literal definition of propaganda and the whole doomcock debacle is just a circle jerk of propaganda from both sides. The mass of the population don’t care about man babies yelling idiocies into thier megaphones, nor go to the other extreme wasting thier time and try and silence theses fools that only impact thier own echo chambers.
If these reports are factual the sad part is the continuing lack of inspiration. Making the same shit over again with a different character is just the same thing as before with a minor change. Why can’t they actually make something new and entertaining? It doesn’t have to try and set up a passing of the torch like Crystal Skull tried and failed at, just needs to be a simple story with character development, an obstacle to overcome, and some resolution to the story while being cohesive throughout the storytelling using an already established and beloved character. Shit ain’t rocket science
The rumor is Waller-Bridge is Brody's daughter and she has scenes with Boyd Holbrook's character (who people have speculated could be a re-cast Mutt).
![]()
Phoebe Waller-Bridge may replace Harrison Ford as lead in ‘Indiana Jones’: Report
Phoebe Waller-Bridge could replace Harrison Ford as the lead in the fifth installment of the “Indiana Jones” franchise, which is set to hit theaters next summer.nypost.com
![]()
Rumor: Phoebe Waller-Bridge To Replace Indiana Jones As Female Archaeology Professor
A new rumor claims that actress Phoebe Waller-Bridge, known for playing the insufferable L3-37 in Solo: A Star Wars Story, […]boundingintocomics.com
![]()
Is Indiana Jones 5 Setting Up Phoebe Waller-Bridge to Replace Harrison Ford? - Odu News
A new rumor concerning upcoming sequel Indiana Jones 5 is sure to cause some...reactions. Accordingodu.bz
![]()
Has Indiana Jones Found Its Replacement For Harrison Ford?
It's possible that Indy will pass off the fedora in Indiana Jones 5.www.cinemablend.com
Fortunately as I stay as far away from Hollywood as humanly possible.
Can i just say I appreciate when a fellow poster tries to bring a slice of cognition to a thread?I always suspect any source that’s mostly all politics and no information of substance injected into its content from either side. It’s the literal definition of propaganda and the whole doomcock debacle is just a circle jerk of propaganda from both sides. The mass of the population don’t care about man babies yelling idiocies into thier megaphones, nor go to the other extreme wasting thier time and try and silence theses fools that only impact thier own echo chambers.
If these reports are factual the sad part is the continuing lack of inspiration. Making the same shit over again with a different character is just the same thing as before with a minor change. Why can’t they actually make something new and entertaining? It doesn’t have to try and set up a passing of the torch like Crystal Skull tried and failed at, just needs to be a simple story with character development, an obstacle to overcome, and some resolution to the story while being cohesive throughout the storytelling using an already established and beloved character. Shit ain’t rocket science
I care.No one is "replacing Indiana Jones" because that's a fucking character. He will retire or die and they'll just make a new movie with a different name that we may or may not watch so...............
![]()
Indian Anna Joan andLet's call it Indiana Joana and I'll be ok with it
Holy shit this is incredible dude, thanks for the laughIndian Anna Joan and
Raiders of the Lost Character Arc
I always suspect any source that’s mostly all politics and no information of substance injected into its content from either side. It’s the literal definition of propaganda and the whole doomcock debacle is just a circle jerk of propaganda from both sides. The mass of the population don’t care about man babies yelling idiocies into thier megaphones, nor go to the other extreme wasting thier time and try and silence theses fools that only impact thier own echo chambers.
If these reports are factual the sad part is the continuing lack of inspiration. Making the same shit over again with a different character is just the same thing as before with a minor change. Why can’t they actually make something new and entertaining? It doesn’t have to try and set up a passing of the torch like Crystal Skull tried and failed at, just needs to be a simple story with character development, an obstacle to overcome, and some resolution to the story while being cohesive throughout the storytelling using an already established and beloved character. Shit ain’t rocket science
Because it isn't about creating something new for these people. It's about tearing stuff down and taking things away from those who care about them.
No one is "replacing Indiana Jones" because that's a fucking character. He will retire or die and they'll just make a new movie with a different name that we may or may not watch so...............
![]()
I care.
The Harrison Ford interpretation of the character (basically the only one that really matters to me despite reading comics and books with IJ) is important to me so I would like to see another actor take up the mantle and do justice to HF and IJ while having some leeway for their own spin. But a woman, aborigine, 2020s hipster, etc is just not what I want for this character.
A lot of people that's why they're pilfering the IP
There is a 0% chance that the character of Indiana Jones dies with HF. It is top valuable an IP. The only other option is to remake Raiders using that title without the added "Indiana Jones and the...." bit but let's be honest, it's the name IJ that puts asses in seats.What are you ppl talking about? The character will not be replaced. There will not be a different Indiana Jones. The character will always remain HF. There will be a movie similar to it with a different character and so I ask again, why the fuck do you care if it has no relation to Indie besides maybe being in the same universe? They're not doing anything to Indiana. HF is fucking old, it's about time he retire anyway. This is not a gender swap you incels.
It is top valuable an I
There is a 0% chance that the character of Indiana Jones dies with HF. It is top valuable an IP. The only other option is to remake Raiders using that title without the added "Indiana Jones and the...." bit but let's be honest, it's the name IJ that puts asses in seats.
Do you REALLY believe that?![]()
It doesn't benefit Disney to continue a franchise where they only can profit off ONE of the movies.Do you REALLY believe that?
When has hollywood and megastudios ever stood by an announcement like that FOREVER? Are they signing the film rights back to some specific person who can guard them for a lifetime?
What are you ppl talking about? The character will not be replaced. There will not be a different Indiana Jones. The character will always remain HF. There will be a movie similar to it with a different character and so I ask again, why the fuck do you care if it has no relation to Indie besides maybe being in the same universe? They're not doing anything to Indiana. HF is fucking old, it's about time he retire anyway. This is not a gender swap you incels.
As far the characters still there, sadly because many times the people writing these types of movies lack the talent to develop a good character they often do it at the expense of the old ones.
That is because they are wedded to these ancient actors, producers, and directors. If they wanted to, they could hire a new team and pop out an IJ film every other year. There is plenty of expanded universe IP for them to mine for ideas. The first 3 were all in the same decade, remember. But as we saw with TYIJC, there is a specific type of IJ adventure the fans want, not just anything with Indiana Jones slapped on it (though I liked most of TYIJC, I think Flannery was miscast and the focus of the show was too much on education [like a lot of youth content back then] and not enough on action and fun).It's not. Last one came out 13 years ago. Top value means milking. That is not the case.
That is because they are wedded to these ancient actors, producers, and directors.
Then it makes even MORE sense to make new IJ films they CAN profit from. Otherwise the Lucasarts acquisition is just Star Wars and they are already driving that into the grave. And I'm not sure Paramount itself is in a great position right now, their back catalogue has got to have the major streamer players salivating.It doesn't benefit Disney to continue a franchise where they only can profit off ONE of the movies.
Indy isn't like Star Wars where after the Fox purchase Disney owns 100% of the films and can stream them and resell them in $300 deluxe boxed sets forever.
Paramount still (and will continue to) owns the first four movies. Disney couldn't get the rights to those. With Harrison being 80 they decided this is the end of the series as they have always said hey aren't recasting him.
Exactly my point. As they shed these legacy folks the project can move forward. If the goal is "create more IJ movies" then these old folks with well secured positions are not the ones to do it. They need folks with fresh vision and drive to make their mark. I just want them to come from a place of respect for the IP, it isn't that hard or complicated.Lucas and Spielberg aren't involved with this one. It's being written and directed by James Mangold. Spielberg dropped out when the WWII angle came in because he won't do "cartoon Nazis" anymore after Schindler's List.