• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

EDGE: "Power struggle: the real differences between PS4 and Xbox One performance"

ghst

thanks for the laugh
Indeed. I compartmentalise my excitement according to my expectations for a given device. You should've seen me losing my shit over Killzone: Mercenaries. My missus actually pulled out the 'yes dear, that's lovely' line at one point.

well this is the thing for me, and my primary issue with what i'm seeing a lot of from these new consoles. i've no doubt that the PS4 could've been showcased with an absolutely stunning wipeout-alike with a solid 60FPS and clean IQ. a game which delivered a great visual experience which didn't compromise on clarity/fluidity.
 
If a company spends $400 million on a fucking exclusive NFL app, what makes you think they dont moneyhat devs so they don't make their PS4 version superior?
If developers dumb down games for the ps4 because of the xbox's weaker console, then I think it's time to vote with your wallet and not support them.
 
Not sure why this matters. The most powerful console usually doesn't sell the best.

True but the cheapest normally does and this time the PS4 is both the most powerful and the cheaper one. Do people forget the price difference when they try dismissing the power argument?

Because it does give a certain degree of perspective, when articulated properly. It's a bit like wading into a biscuit argument carrying a cake. Or maybe a beer argument brandishing a vodka.

PC has no place in a console comparison. We all know it's stronger no point bringing it up other than to try to end the argument cheaply
 

bigmf

Member
They said that it could damage perceptions of a cross platform title, not to mention Xbox One, if the PS4 version shipped with an obviously superior resolution and framerate; better to “castrate” the PS4 version and release near-identical games to avoid ruffling any feathers.

This claim was later countered by a contact at a different studio. “It would be totally fine for us to make one version prettier without any political difficulties but it usually doesn’t make financial sense,” they said, “unless it’s a very simple tweak.”

This shit right here would make me extremely unhappy. Taken to an illogical extreme, it would mean we'll all be playing WiiU games.

I think, though, that it couldn't last long into the life cycle. First party games could start to take a bite out of the multi-platform titles profits if they're visually superior.
 
I am not getting into this petty arguments, the pc gamers are shitting the thread as usual. This about the Xbox one and the PS4, literally nothing at all to do with pc so why bring it up for Dick measuring?
I agree, we should leave PC out because it makes "which will have the better multiplats" arguments irrelevant.
 
In 'merica where there is tight integration between tv services and Xbox One, MS have a chance. But in the rest of the world where 90% of these 'services' will never get released the Xbox One hasn't got a chance.

not really. the TV services are a misstep, and there's a few reasons why.

DVRs are becoming more and more standard, and the Xbone integration doesnt work with those.

also, Cable operators like Comcast Already have proprietary services that duplicate everything the Xbone does, and are better integrated.
As cable operators tend to be a monopoly in their given areas (or damn close to it) this means that Microsoft can't sell tv functions to giant swaths of the country.
 

SmokyDave

Member
well this is the thing for me, and my primary issue with what i'm seeing a lot of from these new consoles. i've no doubt that the PS4 could've been showcased with an absolutely stunning wipeout-alike with a solid 60FPS and clean IQ. a game which delivered a great visual experience which didn't compromise on clarity/fluidity.
Sparks > IQ in the console realm though. I doubt that'll change any time soon.
 

maverick40

Junior Member
Because it does give a certain degree of perspective, when articulated properly. It's a bit like wading into a biscuit argument carrying a cake. Or maybe a beer argument brandishing a vodka.

Haha!True! Obviously the pc is going to be the most powerful out of the three. Everyone here on Gaf knows this, it is like the pc guys get no attention On the forums and just stroll into threads about unrelated console news and start waving dicks around.
 

keuja

Member
If there is one thing that unites the Sony and MS fans together, it's their hate of the arrogant PC "master race".
also mocking the WiiU
 
Calm down cowboys, no need to rush in here and defend your dad. Just pointing something out that's been obvious with Edge. Reporting facts to me is actually naming your sources, but its something British journalist seem to get away with.

Your post history makes statements like the ones you're making very hypocritical.
 
Because all of these damning articles are giving them clicks?

Edge has clearly chosen a "side"

Doesn't mean the article is wrong however, but I can't wait for real tech experts to chime in

Real tech experts having been saying the same thing for months .
Unless you talking about DF and if you saying edge chose a side the same can be said for them .

Well, it is called credibility.
I have 0 for them, and that's their fault.

They have credibility you chose not to see it .
All you have to do is look at the leaks leading up before consoles were showed .
To see how they right were on most things and knew stuff others did not .
 

Finalizer

Member
Because it does give a certain degree of perspective, when articulated properly.

There's no perspective beyond the poster's insecurity though. Duh, PC games look better. You're talking about a moving target that takes into account potentially significantly more expensive hardware investments. Yet it's irrelevant in a discussion pertaining to the hardware difference between upcoming consoles, it doesn't bring anything else to the table beyond dickwaving. People who bring it up are that guy.

EDIT:

Huh? None of that sounds offensive.

It's thinly veiled derailment. Judging by how the thread's going now, it's working.
 

Rad-

Member
One developer added that it rarely makes financial sense to optimise a multiplatform game for one particular platform. “It would be totally fine for us to make one version prettier without any political difficulties but it usually doesn't make financial sense,” said the developer, “unless it’s a very simple tweak.”

.
 

SmokyDave

Member
Haha!True! Obviously the pc is going to be the most powerful out of the three. Everyone here on Gaf knows this, it is like the pc guys get no attention On the forums and just stroll into threads about unrelated console news and start waving dicks around.
It's a dickwaving thread though. No point in grumbling when Lex Steele turns up.
 

jim2011

Member
not really. the TV services are a misstep, and there's a few reasons why.

DVRs are becoming more and more standard, and the Xbone integration doesnt work with those.

also, Cable operators like Comcast Already have proprietary services that duplicate everything the Xbone does, and are better integrated.
As cable operators tend to be a monopoly in their given areas (or damn close to it) this means that Microsoft can't sell tv functions to giant swaths of the country.

Pretty sure Xbox one can still control your dvr. You'll still probably want to use your dvr remote for a lot of things but I'm sure it can do simple commands that any universal remote can.

I think many people miss the whole point. Controlling tv is not the priority with hdmi in. Making it so Xbox one is always on your primary input and overlaying everything is Microsoft's priority. Always connected. Always available.

This is why I'm excited for Xbox one more than ps4.
 

Ushae

Banned
This thread is hilarious.

We went from..

*PC Master Race Spectating*
Sony VS MS

to

Sony + MS VS PC Master Race?

Dafuk?
 

Dunlop

Member
Real tech experts having been saying the same thing for months .
Unless you talking about DF and if you saying edge chose a side the same can be said for them .



They have credibility you chose not to see it .
All you have to do is look at the leaks leading up before consoles were showed .
To see how they right were on most things and knew stuff others did not .

I'm talking all of them, once these things launch it will be a lot clearer of how much more powerful the PS4 is
 
There's no perspective beyond the poster's insecurity though. Duh, PC games look better. You're talking about a moving target that takes into account potentially significantly more expensive hardware investments. Yet it's irrelevant in a discussion pertaining to the hardware difference between upcoming consoles, it doesn't bring anything else to the table beyond dickwaving. People who bring it up are that guy.

Well, to put a different spin on it; maybe it's actually relevant to demonstrate that early cycle console games are not fully indicative of the kind of output the hardware will see later in the generation.
 

Dr.Acula

Banned
I'll probably get crap for this, but when your publication does things like this, that doesn't exactly make you a trustworthy source for this kind of information.

If the headline was "NextGen: Dead Heat" would that make them more or less trustworthy?

Edit: I somehow replied to a really really old post.
 

Mohonky

Member
9At8.gif
As someone else said earlier, if this is the 'next gen' consoles then coune me out. My PC will more than suffice and i am having a load of fun with my (horrendously under powered) Wii U.

This is the first console generation where I honestly feel absolutely o need to run out and buy a 'next gen' console. The Wii U has been a surprisingly awrsome bundle of joy and my PC from what i have seen will be plenty capable beside next gen hardware.

Maybe i am getting over gaming in general but I have become increasingly picky about what I enjoy in games and right now, coming from the Xbox360 as my current go to console, i feel as though i am less and less inclined to bother with the Xbone or PS4, and more than a few of my mates are in the same boat. I bought a Wii U for the fact that its doing somethi g different and to be honest have not be disappointed in the least. Microsoft a least are doing Kinect which might be much to the annoyance of the hardcore cowd, but well, we all saw how poorly that stupid kinect, los of crow eaten on hat ne. PS4? They will no doubt have a superb fist parth line up but otherwise they dont have anything to other than teh specs to go on about and theirbshowings so far have consisted of not much else more than looking at what Microsoft have said and saying he complete opposite.

For me, PC and Wii U seems the obvious choice. If you dont like Nintendo games you can forego the Wii U and go PC because that offers the ultimate in versatility and performance.

Edit. Few drinks and ipad keypad, not a good mix do make.
 

maverick40

Junior Member
It's a dickwaving thread though. No point in grumbling when Lex Steele turns up.

Haha damn. Either way this thread has been genuinely interesting with some excellent replies from most. The question now remains, will Microsoft respond to the EDGE's revelations?
 

szaromir

Banned
You're attacking a strawman, noone said they expect that. What they expect is 50% difference in performance whatever that means (Edge gave an example). On the other hand some people here are trying to convince themselves that the difference will be smaller because devs won't bother with the PS4 version as much, which is ridiculous to say the least.
There are far more people who are claiming that the difference will be huge, like between PC and consoles. Obviously since PS4 and Xbone share the same architecture (minus the memory setup) you'd expect low level optimizations to benefit both and it's hard to predict a situation where PS4 could be neglected.

I specifically said what sort of differences I expect when games will finally appear - similar to RDR between 360 and PS3. The PS3 version was much inferior to the 360 one, but it didn't stop even many GAF users - who are clearly enthusiast or hardcore gamers - from playing the clearly worse version. Not too mention people ignoring PC gaming where the quality is the highest. So I don't think the 40% difference is terribly important, even if clearly noticeable.

Personally I don't know why someone interested in getting the highest quality would ignore PC.
 

Enordash

Member
I am not getting into this petty arguments, the pc gamers are shitting the thread as usual. This about the Xbox one and the PS4, literally nothing at all to do with pc so why bring it up for Dick measuring?

I suppose that's true, but as long as we understand that the thread is for console gamer dick measuring, it's cool then?

Edit: If these comments are inappropriate, please let me know and I'll remove them. I'm just generally interested in the mindset. I'm not trying to defend either console or downplay the differences between them.
 

fallingdove

Member
Their comments aren't worthy of consideration if they're openly discussing Xbox One performance without using the ESRAM. No one will ship a demanding game on Xbox One which doesn't use the ESRAM.

It's also not surprising to hear that the resolution and frame rate drops when you're clearly going to be bandwidth limited.

What the hell are you on about? The article doesn't omit ESRAM as a part of the equation. In fact, it calls out that DEVs think that the ESRAM is a pain in the ass.
 

AOC83

Banned
Don´t know what all the fuss is about, we know the specs, we know that the PS4 blows the Xbone out of the water and that´s it.
 

AutumnRay

Banned
Sparks > IQ in the console realm though. I doubt that'll change any time soon.

Well, they are going to be getting a lot of facking complaints with foliage and jaggies looking terrible when they claim their game is gorgeous. I think the abilities are there to make AA great this gen. We just have to see how it holds up. I target AA specifically but pop-in and all that jazz should be mostly solved as well. And of course full resolution ffs.
 

Finalizer

Member
Well, to put a different spin on it; maybe it's actually relevant to demonstrate that early cycle console games are not fully indicative of the kind of output the hardware will see later in the generation.

I'm not saying that PC is totally irrelevant to the conversation, just the angle of "games look better on PC anyway so this whole debate is pointless lol."

Hell, I've got a PC that I play games on all the time. I could upgrade it to a point that leaves these consoles in the dust too. But that much doesn't do anything for the conversation. And it annoys me when other people do just that.

This thread is hilarious.

We went from..

*PC Master Race Spectating*
Sony VS MS

to

Sony + MS VS PC Master Race?

Dafuk?

row row fight da powah
 

Derrick01

Banned
Shame it seems like the Xbone is going to hold back multiplatfom developments.

Hopefully not tho.

Not really. The power difference is definitely there but it's not enough to change what types of games people will want to do at the core. Like some developer isn't going to say "Damn it we wanted to do an open world game but can't because XB1's GPU is too weak!"

What you'll see is that open world game still being made but having better effects on PS4, or better framerate, or better draw distance. Or maybe a combo of all of those things. Since both are using blu ray disc formats now it won't be like this gen where 360's disc type DID hold people back to a degree, and the RAM on both consoles held devs back in the last 3-4 years of the generation.
 

ethomaz

Banned
At this point nobody can deny the PS4 is more powerful and Sony is ahead in the schedule for development of the system and games.

Sad about the fact that multiplats will be limited to the "worst".
 
Pretty sure Xbox one can still control your dvr. You'll still probably want to use your dvr remote for a lot of things but I'm sure it can do simple commands that any universal remote can.

the point of the integration is to provide a level of control that a universal remote isn't capable of. "xbox play last night's episode of Breaking Bad" flat out won't work here. and if it doesn't, what's the point?

I noticed you also glossed over the largest cable company in the country (22 million households) already providing the exact same service, with their DVR function moving to the cloud. How exactly is the IR blaster going to work there?
 

Stinkles

Clothed, sober, cooperative
Personally I don't know why someone interested in getting the highest quality would ignore PC.

Seriously? You don't know? It's worse than the beer/vodka analogy above. It's more like wading into a motorbike thread to point out that your car has a trunk and seatbelts.
 
I'm talking all of them, once these things launch it will be a lot clearer of how much more powerful the PS4 is

Not really unless you think they going to be max out at launch .
It will take a while for many reason (devs tools , skill , learning curve , budget etc etc )
If it's one thing the specs tell you would be is 3rd party games won't be gimp like PS3.
 

bonus_sco

Banned
What the hell are you on about? The article doesn't omit ESRAM as a part of the equation. In fact, it calls out that DEVs think that the ESRAM is a pain in the ass.

The comment in the article talking about the resolution and frame rate says they are from a "platform agnostic" build. This means a build which doesn't utilise the esram.

Just because whoever that dev was found it a pain doesn't mean it won't or shouldn't be used in performance comparisons. It's an integral part of the design of the console, not using it would be foolish and is disingenuous.
 
I really have no idea what to expect from 3rd parties. On one hand, I can understand they want to maintain parity for good relations with everyone. On the other hand, they will have to compete with 1st parties and some 3rd parties. I really think it will be a dev by dev choice and some studios will have parity and others will push the ps4 versions a bit more to stay competitive.

2014 and beyond is going to be very interesting.
 

$h@d0w

Junior Member
without optimisation for either console, a platform-agnostic development build can run at around 30FPS in 1920×1080 on PS4, but it’ll run at “20-something” FPS in 1600×900 on Xbox One. “Xbox One is weaker and it’s a pain to use its ESRAM,” concluded one developer.

This is huge. Bigger than the "maximum theoretical performance" debate.

It's widely known (i.e. there are presentations on it) that when Cerny designed the PS4, he prioritised "time to triangle" so developers would be able to get something running at a decent speed (as evidenced above).

This is going to affect indies and middle tier developers the most.

It might not matter that Ubisoft, EA or Activision has to hire a few developers or outsource the Xbox One build of a game out, however to your indie teams they don't have the resources.


These one man bands, best friends or teams under five people - Microsoft has lost these guys. Who can afford to spend all that extra time optimising when your PS4 build is already firing on all cylinders within weeks.

I betting there are going to be more PS4 de facto exclusives because of this.

Guess what - this was totally the plan from the beginning.

In a recent interview for 4gamer (http://www.4gamer.net/games/990/G999024/20130911114/), Shuhei Yoshida showed great nostalgia for that time in the PS2 era where there were tons of "mid tier" games coming out. They want to recreate that era. The indies of today are the mid tier of tomorrow and Sony has them all exclusive, not only because of developer relations but also because of their hardware design.

iEH1ReqyupwLk.png


Mister Mosquito 3 - fucking bring it.
 

Horp

Member
I think we have some real double standards posters in this thread. I'm talking about some (alot) of the PS4 fans.

1. When there is a discussion on whether certain aspects of quality matter; such as IQ, framerate and resolution:
If it's a XboxOne vs PS4 discussion it's extremely important and a major bonus for the PS4 over the X1.
When the discussion is between PS4 and PC it's all about the gameplay and who cares about some aliasing, upscaled 720p or 30 instead of 60 fps when you are playing a game.

2. When there is a discussion on whether PS4/X1 hardware is much like a PC or very specialized (secret saucy).
If it's a X1 vs PS4 discussion the hardware in both is exactly like PC:s, and therefore can be compared straight up, thus the PS4 wins cause it has more FLOPS.
If it's a PS4 vs PC discussion the GDDR, the hUMA, the superchargyness makes a PS4 way different from a PC and can't possibly be compared with FLOPS.

3. When there is a discussion whether power really matters
X1 vs PS4: of course power matters, it gives developers more possibilities and makes IQ/framerate better.
PS4 vs PC: nah, it's all about the games. Who cares about 1080p@60fps or upcoming 4k resolutions; it's all in the games.

Also; in a thread about comparing the power between 2 gaming machines, isn't it weird that when someone brings up the third real competitor (the PC) when talking about multiplatform games he is answered with "Not this shit again, GTFO"?
 
Top Bottom