Umm they both have the same issues we already knew this.Many many people also said the GTA4 ps3 version was fine.
Not sure what you are trying to do here.
Umm they both have the same issues we already knew this.Many many people also said the GTA4 ps3 version was fine.
Right, right. Totally down play the fact that they pioneered the open world franchise, and have some of the greatest creative minds in gaming.
Ars Technica Review -- No score, but some technical notes on the first page.
Wow Sesslers review is insanely good.
Looks like 360 critics are a bit more lenient:
I skipped 'em once I got bored of the music. You can do it!
People need to stop using this logic 'cause it does not apply to every developer. Rockstar is the valedictorian of the gaming industry and this generation, and scores like this definitely don't look well on their transcript. A 3.5 out of 5 might be good for C average developers, but not Rockstar.
Ars Technica Review -- No score, but some technical notes on the first page.
This hyperbole is just as bad as the 7.5s.10's are 100% justified. This game is better than any other game in existence. In scale, quality and grandiosity. If a game can deserve 10's, it's GTA V.
I know people were probably joking about "that one site who is gonna give a 7 for clicks"
Still, that escapist review was written by Greg Tito. The person who gave Dragon Age II a 10/10
I don't know, man
I am talking about the Escapist review. The review people will claim is click-bait while clicking furiously on it.
No info on 360 version?
Scores should go away. Seriously.
They fuck with peoples mind and make them crazy.
At least on the PlayStation 3 version I tried, though the price for all this beauty is paid in framerate dips, messy anti-aliasing, ridiculous texture pop-in, and a reduction from the box's advertised "720p" resolution. A new version of the game on next-gen consoles or the PC would no doubt fix these issues and really set mouths drooling. As it is, Rockstar should be commended for duct-taping this mix of details and sacrifices while keeping the framerate tolerable and the glitch count to a minimum.
Ars Technica Review -- No score, but some technical notes on the first page.
WTF is up with everybody getting all up on their high horse about how women are depicted in games?
It's a fucking video game! It's fiction! It's entertainment! I know this is a hot item, but it seems some outlets are really focussing on that issue alone.
I won't talk about the issue itself, because I'm in no need for a shitstorm, but damn it get's on my nerves!
At least on the PlayStation 3 version I tried, though the price for all this beauty is paid in framerate dips, messy anti-aliasing, ridiculous texture pop-in, and a reduction from the box's advertised "720p" resolution.
oh, for fuck's sake.
i might not get this.
(never seen a better score for 360 or PS3 version)
I am talking about the Escapist review. The review people will claim is click-bait while clicking furiously on it.
Both versions have the same issues. Not sure about the 720p point, though.
I've never really bought into a reviewer tanking a review for hits. I mean maybe it's happened, but that seems really weird.Either that 3.5/5 or 7/10 is accurate or someone wanted hits.
Wait for next gen/PC with me, bro! STAY STRONG.
Wow
Sessler namedropping Bill Hicks in the review
I know people were probably joking about "that one site who is gonna give a 7 for clicks"
Still, that escapist review was written by Greg Tito. The person who gave Dragon Age II a 10/10
I don't know, man
Will wait for PC. Reviews have me more excited about this game whereas before I didn't give a shit. Hopefully its out by next Spring.
That's odd. I haven't noticed a single drop in 14 hours of gameplay on my PS3. I'm usually sensitive to that kind of thing. It's been a solid 25fps all the way through.
There hasn't been a single instance of screen tearing either.
I've never really bought into a reviewer tanking a review for hits. I mean maybe it's happened, but that seems really weird.
As for it being accurate, well sure. It's their opinion. Basically impossible for it to inaccurate.
That review sort of reminds me of Breaking Bad. My wife stopped watching because it was difficult to watch. She didn't want to root for anyone, nobody on the show is "clean". Whereas I find it fascinating and can't get enough of it.
Neither reaction is wrong. And really, Escapist's comments make me even more interested in the story now. Would be much worse if all they felt after playing the game was indifference.
WTF is up with everybody getting all up on their high horse about how women are depicted in games?
It's a fucking video game! It's fiction! It's entertainment! I know this is a hot item, but it seems some outlets are really focussing on that issue alone.
I won't talk about the issue itself, because I'm in no need for a shitstorm, but damn it get's on my nerves! And it's all the more apparent in these GTA V reviews.
Scores should go away. Seriously.
They fuck with peoples mind and make them crazy.
Oh shit, Brandon Jones himself reviewed GTA V for GT.
I can wait for PC version. I know I can do it. Especially since I don't own neither console. I hope I can.