I hope Adam Sandler doesn't leave the industry
People need to have some common sense about this copyright thing. One company like Sony isn't going to cut off the majority of revenue due to restrictions. It seems like a broader issue to me but when you have vague terminology then these "professional game journalists" need to just keep hush and not put out cryptic words and cut to the chase. It does us nor them any service and you see people over react. Especially right now when people are in high tension mode over every little bit of news that can make one platform worse or better.
When you start having 500 posts about lack of background wallpaper then you know things are a little too sensitive.
-Journalists are mad about somethingIs there a decent summary on this thread cause it's damn hard to follow.
-Journalists are mad about something
-Cant talk about it because they aint journalists.
-Complain about it on Twitter without being clear on what is going on, includes embarrassing tweet of a journalist's wife using his account to complain corporations ruined their weekend.
I would post it if someone leaked it to me. they cant do nothing to me.
-Journalists are mad about something
-Cant talk about it because they aint journalists.
-Complain about it on Twitter without being clear on what is going on, includes embarrassing tweet of a journalist's wife using his account to complain corporations ruined their weekend.
you forgot about that Cboat quote about xbox having issues and that we wont find out until launch. seems we are talking a bit about everything in this thread
That's the weird thing about ads inside the video though. Google would have no idea what Rev3 gets paid for that ad, so Google has no idea how much of a cut they should get.
With the ads integrated right into the youtube player, Google knows exactly what the split of profits are for each and every ad watched.
(From other thread)
Its likely not consoles, Sony/ms... Seems like publishers wanting it blocked via YouTube....
Sessler =consoles
Total biscuit livelihood = PC
Only correlation is the publishers forcing YouTube??
so what's going on here? I Thought this was about Sessler and others not getting invited to the PS4 review event? Is that the big story/fuss? I'm more pissed off at Yosh saying we can't customize anything at launch.
-Journalists are mad about something
-Cant talk about it because they aint journalists.
-Complain about it on Twitter without being clear on what is going on, includes embarrassing tweet of a journalist's wife using his account to complain corporations ruined their weekend.
-Seems the issue is a big deal to them and not to us, which is why is a big fucking deal to the guy that had no problem with DRM measures.
I would post it if someone leaked it to me. they cant do nothing to me.
obviously you have a valid point, and yes, to much shit is going down for nothing, like that wallpaper shit. its scary.
However, if its something serious that Cboat is talking about, that might be hurtful for the consumer, then they should leak it, however it its just some stupid thing like, xboned/PS4 wont have capture feature from launch then its nothing to talk about.
but this seems to be more serious than that, otherwise I dont get why Cboat and Bish hinted at it.
gracias my friend...We have absolutely no idea what's going on. There's several theories, but we don't have any solid answers yet because of stupid cryptic/vague tweeting.
Conjectures at this point and they may not be related, theres a review event but according to a guy from Kotaku they could easily giving the debug units there.Some folks talk about Youtube? PS4 review event, not being able to get debug kits?
What are those rumors about?
I think it's publishers only allowing provided footage in reviews or doing those review events.
Well, there's still a concern, though. Even though you're not under an NDA, by leaking information, the company in question knows the information has been leaked and is going to seek out the source. Now, if you have any integrity whatsoever, you're obviously not going to reveal your source should you get any inquiry as to where that information came from. However, that doesn't mean the leak can't or won't get traced back to your source.
So, that's why even in the Internet age, it's understandable when people don't want to take risks. I don't think the Internet era of numerous mechanisms for information sharing alleviates concerns as much as some think.
What about Sir Buttocks? What's stopping him from posting? Everything he posts is probably bound by a NDA of some kind. When I worked in the NFL I was bound by an NDA so as not to affect trades by leaking information, i.e. I saw such and such in the cafeteria today.
I don't get how NDA can even be a problem here.
Mystery NDA Guy: "Hey, here's an NDA, sign it and we tell you something awesome."
Vidya Game Guy: "Ahm, ok, I guess? *signs NDA*
Mystery NDA Guy: "We gonna fuck you up. And don't forget not to tell anyone!"
What about Sir Buttocks? What's stopping him from posting? Everything he posts is probably bound by a NDA of some kind. When I worked in the NFL I was bound by an NDA so as not to affect trades by leaking information, i.e. I saw such and such in the cafeteria today.
What about Sir Buttocks? What's stopping him from posting? Everything he posts is probably bound by a NDA of some kind. When I worked in the NFL I was bound by an NDA so as not to affect trades by leaking information, i.e. I saw such and such in the cafeteria today.
If you speak up after signing an NDA you put too many things on the line. Most people are not willing to give up their job, the reputation of their employer, etc to tell people what they'll likely find out in a few days anyway.
Is there a decent summary on this thread cause it's damn hard to follow.
What about Sir Buttocks? What's stopping him from posting? Everything he posts is probably bound by a NDA of some kind. When I worked in the NFL I was bound by an NDA so as not to affect trades by leaking information, i.e. I saw such and such in the cafeteria today.
He's not in trouble unless he gets caught.
He's been doing it for a long time, if they haven't stopped his crazy buttocks yet, then he both has the balls to do it, and knows what the fuck he's doing.
I agree, but i also think if you've signed an NDA, then putting out cryptic messages to social media is a dick move and is highly unprofessional.
I've always been secretly and madly in love with you.-Journalists are mad about something
-Cant talk about it because they aint journalists.
-Complain about it on Twitter without being clear on what is going on, includes embarrassing tweet of a journalist's wife using his account to complain about how corporations ruined their weekend.
-Seems the issue is a big deal to them and not to us, which is why is a big fucking deal to the guy that had no problem with Xbox One DRM measures.
-Journalists are mad about something
-Cant talk about it because they aint journalists.
-Complain about it on Twitter without being clear on what is going on, includes embarrassing tweet of a journalist's wife using his account to complain about how corporations ruined their weekend.
-Seems the issue is a big deal to them and not to us, which is why is a big fucking deal to the guy that had no problem with Xbox One DRM measures.
Here they are for others.
My best answer is that either Microsoft or Sony are probably not allowing ANY captured footage from their next gen console, dramatically limiting the video content Sessler and Revision 3 can put out.
Edit: Or monitization, yeah. That seems most likely.
Ding ding ding.
Shuhei Yoshida Has No Idea Why Adam Sessler Would Have A Problem With Sony
Yeah. My bet is that it's Sony.
I have zero interest in speculating about the motivations of insiders and why they do or don't leak some of the information they're privy to. I was just seeking to address the notion that living in the post Wiki-leaks era with stuff like Pastebin wherein there are other avenues to hand off info aside from handing over Manila envelopes of documents in parking garages in the middle of the night doesn't mean that leakers have nothing to fear when leaking information. Perhaps I was misreading the intent of the post (quite possible since I slept poorly and feel awful right now), but there seemed to be a suggestion that this stuff is easy. I.e. tell someone who's not under an NDA, let them share it publicly, and you're done. I was countering that I don't think it's that simple.
Investigative journalists - We have none of these in the industry
Journalists - We have a couple willing to ask the hard questions
Reporters - We have many of these, reporting on the latest game releases and news
Critics - We have tons of these reporting their opinion on the quality of games
The problem here is you guys are expecting a) and b) from the industry, and it doesn't really exists.