Woah, it's getting shorter.
Still going to wait until the game is out. GI wrote that it's a very fun game
So they cancelled ZoE3 but decided to sell the MGS demo anyway? Ballsy move Konami.
Honestly I just skipped right through most of the comments, but good to know. ^_^No, if you look at my past posts you'll know I'm against the price. Just stating facts and inferring it'll be short. The main mission is short and that's with cutscenes.
Well this game was always a rental for me and this news just cements that decision, but damn the balls on Konami for charging for what sounds like a demo. I felt dirty when I bought GT5 Prologue, but this is on a whole different level.
This is going to look so bad too if when they release Metal Gear Solid Phantom Pain they have this bundled in front as a prologue of sorts
Are there side missions, if so how long is the game, as long as I can get 5-7 hours but I doubt it.
Just so you know guys, Darksiders 1 demo was 2 hours long. Which means that an actual free demo might just be longer than the main mission!
That demo was incredible. I bet that dungeon is bigger than the main mission. But you can't really play a dungeon in different ways.
GT5 prologue was a solid 16-20 hours experience, this is on another level of greed. Kojima should be ashamed of himself for agreeing to this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpE_xMRiCLE&feature=youtube_gdata_playerNow it's 1.5 hours?!
This deal is getting worse all the time.
Lol now it's 1,5 hours? I fully expect it to be 5 minutes when I wake up tomorrow.
Took the words out of my mouthNow it's 1.5 hours?!
This deal is getting worse all the time.
I'll wait for a price drop.
Next week, "you've all already beaten Ground Zeroes unknowingly".
Not saying anyone has to consider Ground Zeroes to be worth the money, but the people who played it seem to think it's worth it.
people should watch the Game Informer video instead of having kneejerk reactions to a title change.
Not saying anyone has to consider Ground Zeroes to be worth the money, but the people who played it seem to think it's worth it.
people should watch the Game Informer video instead of having kneejerk reactions to a title change.
Not saying anyone has to consider Ground Zeroes to be worth the money, but the people who played it seem to think it's worth it.
But they played it for free. Also, it's not really a review.
I really can't trust their opinion on their cover story, particularly when the price point has no impact on them.
?
The last 5 or so minutes is them talking about whether it's worth the price. They say things like how in 1.5 hours they had a lot more fun than they did playing other 30-40 dollar "value" games. Or how the time it takes to see the credits isn't directly related to the quality or amount of enjoyment you can get from the game.
Lol now it's 1,5 hours? I fully expect it to be 5 minutes when I wake up tomorrow.
Why wouldn't you trust their opinion?
?
The last 5 or so minutes is them talking about whether it's worth the price. They say things like how in 1.5 hours they had a lot more fun than they did playing other 30-40 dollar "value" games. Or how the time it takes to see the credits isn't directly related to the quality or amount of enjoyment you can get from the game.
people should watch the Game Informer video instead of having kneejerk reactions to a title change.
Not saying anyone has to consider Ground Zeroes to be worth the money, but the people who played it seem to think it's worth it.
Not saying anyone has to consider Ground Zeroes to be worth the money, but the people who played it seem to think it's worth it.
?
The last 5 or so minutes is them talking about whether it's worth the price. They say things like how in 1.5 hours they had a lot more fun than they did playing other 30-40 dollar "value" games. Or how the time it takes to see the credits isn't directly related to the quality or amount of enjoyment you can get from the game.
Fair enough, I'm pretty certain that reviews on this game will reflect the "clear time"/price ratio though so future buyers will be aware of what kind of deal they're getting into.For the reasons I said. I'll accept the facts of their coverage, but their opinion on a cover story I can't get too invested in. Particularly when the price point, the key problem, isn't an issue they've had to deal with in this case.
I want this to bomb just so other publishers don't start charging for fucking demos.