Gameplay is similar and that map is pretty much the same. The details/animations are missing and colors definitely look washed out though. Textures look like a Cod game for a 360 for sure though. Watching this actually made me notice the good details/resolution of the X1 version though lol
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Titanfall 360 - Gameplay Video.
- Thread starter Miles Quaritch
- Start date
DoubleTake
Member
Really wondering what respawn did to the source engine to have it run like it does for Titfall
When he ejected out of the Titan there was no eject animation you normally always see when ejecting from a Titan.
travisbickle
Member
Wow, Bluepoint did a really good job emulating the XOne experience, even included the screen-tearing, dodgy framerate and geometry pop-in.
When he ejected out of the Titan there was no eject animation you normally always see when ejecting from a Titan.
It's a perk. Auto eject
Poimandres
Member
Looks as good as anyone could hope, really. I find the split between "looks great" and "looks horrible" in this thread very amusing!
if by damn close that the textures are a fraction of the resolution and that the image is rendered at a sub 600p resolution or that the color is toned down and the sfx are nearly completely gone... then yes... yes pretty close, but then that's not really close at all is it?
Later Alligator
Member
im happy with what ive seen in the footage, glad i picked up a 360 recently and can play this!
I've literally been playing it on Xbox One all day. There is a difference but it's really not a generational kind of gap. The XB1 version isn't exactly a looker.
Poimandres
Member
Looks like Titanfall really was a system seller!
I use that perk in every match and I still go through the animation of having to see myself pressing the buttons to eject out of my Titan.
TrueGrime
Member
There is no button press animation with auto-eject. Hence the auto. You just go.
Doug Heffernan
Member
Alright, I'm in
...as soon as the price hits $30.
$30 is what I paid for Garden Warfare, so my price standard for a multiplayer-only game has been set.
...as soon as the price hits $30.
$30 is what I paid for Garden Warfare, so my price standard for a multiplayer-only game has been set.
I forgot.=O
S0cc3rpunk
Unconfirmed Member
EA should just give us a discount on the 360 version, for the ones that got it for pc and xbox one. But they wouldn't do that :/
Duxxy3
Member
It's not perfect, but I can see why they delayed the game. This is close enough that the 360 version absolutely would have stolen XB1 sales.
There is certainly a difference between the two, but if a consumer just wanted to play titanfall and had the choice of spending $60 for the 360 version, or $450 for the XB1 bundle...
I'm not saying one choice is better than the other, but that choice would have impacted XB1 sales if it was released at the same time.
The price will probably drop quickly, since it's a current-gen version.
...then again, it's EA.
It's a very large, stark difference that will only grow the larger the display is you play it on. Saying titanfall doesn't look next gen I can see but this by comparison isn't even close the the best looking 360 game either. It's a generation gap to me when you consider this isn't even a good looking 360 game in the 360 version.
It looks pretty different to me, they don't seem to be very similar. Resolution, framerate, texture quality, effects, and probably more are higher on the Xbox One while we are just starting the generation and this was Respawn's first experience with Source Engine. The One version could've come out a whole lot better, sure, but the fact that's it's pretty noticeably different with these circumstances while Bluepoint is working on hardware that's been out for 8 years is pretty good, I guess. Not barring the fact that the 360 has a lot of technical limitations for this game.
Sword Of Doom
Member
Graphically looks fine to me. Expected to look much worse
Yeah to me it looks like COD last gen vs next gen. Not too different. Talking about consoles of course. PC excluded
Yeah to me it looks like COD last gen vs next gen. Not too different. Talking about consoles of course. PC excluded
PsihoPerihelion
Member
Looks ok if you don't want to invest on new hardare. If they can emulate the gameplay exactly like the 2 other versions, then everyone should be fine with it.
Wii U is more powerful, duh. Also, what are you expecting from a 7 years old console at this point. Flagship title? flagship for what? Is the 360 re-launching or something?
Wii U is more powerful, duh. Also, what are you expecting from a 7 years old console at this point. Flagship title? flagship for what? Is the 360 re-launching or something?
Like....when they move exclusively to pc?
Not just you.
none of that matters in the end right?
because we have all been told since November that resolution and effects don't matter as long as it's fun, and that a locked 30 fps is better than a variable 40-60.
or do graphics matter again?
OdysseusVA
Banned
Any direct feed shots?
BruiserBear
Banned
I was just watching a stream on my XB1 and thinking the same thing. Significant sacrifices were made to the 360 version to get it running even close to 30fps. Curious to see how low the resolution is.
Yeah because they couldn't get it to a playable state.
Duxxy3
Member
The XIM stream made the game look playable. The earlier stream was crippled by lag.
SomeOneInaHat
Member
All of the AI is run on servers, even during "single player" content.
These people are playing on modded Xbox's to capture this footage, not good testing grounds for an unreleased online shooter.
I look forward to see what the official analysis shows for the game.
Yeah but you and your buddy want to get that conspiracy theory shit out again that it was delayed because it looks too close to the Xbox One version.
It doesn't. It looks awful compared to the Xbox One.
BRocknRolla
Member
Definitely doesn't look as good, but it's a respectable port given the 360's age. (Which is probably partially down to the original not looking great anyway.)
Duxxy3
Member
It looks close enough that it would have taken sales away from the XB1. Same way that sales for the XB1 version of ghosts was affected by the 360 version.
RedAssedApe
Banned
lol those kick kills look hilarious
HoodWinked
Gold Member
i know they had to port it to the 360.
Gamestop pre-orders were 4 times higher on Xbox One breh.
Last gen software sales are down. This will never outsell the Xbox One version. (it was surprising to me that even the Xbox One version sold better than PC)
t_wilson01
Member
Depends if it's convenient to whomever is posting.
No enough of this shit. It runs at 30fps (if not lower at times), has absolutely disgusting textures, is missing multiple effects, has worse lighting, and runs at a lower resolution.
The game looks like crap even for a 360 title. Halo 4 and gears of war 3 came out on the same system.
There is a lot of stuff going on in titanfall. Concessions were made. And then when they got close to release and needed to make more concessions to hit 30fps, they delayed it.
miDnIghtEr20C
Banned
Like I've said before, graphics don't matter to me, it just feels odd that people are bashing the Xbox One over this. I'm no supporter of it, but there is definitely an obvious difference that some people don't mind not seeing.
Duxxy3
Member
The 360 version was never shown to the public and delayed twice, of course pre-orders were low for it. People weren't even sure the 360 version actually existed, that's how little information we had.