Yes, new models OC to 165hz as well so basically they're still as high end as it gets. No HDMI though if that matters for you.this still worth getting now?
Yes, new models OC to 165hz as well so basically they're still as high end as it gets. No HDMI though if that matters for you.this still worth getting now?
Yes, new models OC to 165hz as well so basically they're still as high end as it gets. No HDMI though if that matters for you.
If you don't need one, there's no benefit in having oneI'm looking at one of these for a GTX1070, is there any benefit to having an HDMI port? I likely won't be disconnecting my PS4 from the living room TV, so wont need it for that.
Does this support HDR?
Can't see myself buying any monitor right now that doesn't support HDR to be honest. It's the most exciting tech to come to displays since colour and it's only a matter of time before games start coming out that support it.
Complex answer to this, because "HDR" is too loose a term. As it stands the answer is "it depends". Are you talking about HDR in games, or video playback or what?
this still worth getting now?
I mean specifically HDR10 / Dolby Vision compatibility. From everything I've heard in the hifi world it's quite astonishing to see in person.
Right, the answer you probably want is no. This is a standard IPS LCD panel and doesn't have the nits range to make HDR worth using. Additionally, HDR10 and Dolby Vision concern video and UHD televisions specifically, not computer graphics signals. I think these require particular support from the GPU in drivers and with specific output ports. So probably GPUs released in 2016 onwards.
Games are different and we can probably enjoy HDR on a range of older GPUs once the displays start to arrive and the games get patched or built with updated tone mappers.
Pascal already supports HDR for games though, Nvidia recently published an article about their HDR API etc and their collaboration with CD on ROTR HDR support. I think they also showed it at the reveal event (or maybe it was just a movie can't recall; anyway, it was running on a pascal system).Right, the answer you probably want is no. This is a standard IPS LCD panel and doesn't have the nits range to make HDR worth using. Additionally, HDR10 and Dolby Vision concern video and UHD televisions specifically, not computer graphics signals. I think these require particular support from the GPU in drivers and with specific output ports. So probably GPUs released in 2016 onwards.
Games are different and we can probably enjoy HDR on a range of older GPUs once the displays start to arrive and the games get patched or built with updated tone mappers.
What don't you like about it in particular? Bleed?I can't stand IPS. I've been looking for another monitor but I'm having a tough time finding something. Display tech is poo.
Pascal already supports HDR for games though, Nvidia recently published an article about their HDR API etc and their collaboration with CD on ROTR HDR support. I think they also showed it at the reveal event (or maybe it was just a movie can't recall; anyway, it was running on a pascal system).
But you're right, the lack of HDR Gaming monitors at computex was disappointing and in general Nvidia didn't publish much about the feature.
What don't you like about it in particular? Bleed?
If you don't need one, there's no benefit in having one
Yeah, it still doesn't get much better in terms of gaming-focused IPS screens.
so did a bit of research and found a D version with 1 MS response time
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B018NRT45I/
is this just a faster monitor and nothing else? hmm i'm seeing conflicting info here saying the Hu is 4 MS and 1 MS, which is it?
Yes, the information is right. XB270HUD uses a TN panel, hence the faster pixel response time than the XB270HU with the IPS panel.
If you want to read about panel types, you can do so here. Broadly speaking, IPS will usually look better colour wise, but is not as fast to respond. The XB270HU is a really good IPS display for overall input lag though.
For computers, you should be using DisplayPort, which is the successor to DVI. Especially if you want to use G-Sync. VGA is analogue and long deprecated. HDMI is designed for televisions and Hifi / AV equipment.
Fuck, I think I'm buying this... any reason it would be a bad idea now? Anything better about to come out? It seems like Acer is the go to for IPS Gsync monitors.
Christ that's amazingAlso, 0.25 ms of processing lag.
0.25 ms
I get the feeling a bit that monitor manufacturers never even really tried before NV showed them that there is a market for high-end gaming-focused monitors.
I know people will say don't wait, but I think you should wait for CES. Monitors next year suppose to go 200+ hz with a more up to date display port and Hdmi.
But how expensive will those be? Probably quite expensive right? This is already expensive but I can get it for $600. Not really willing to pay much more than that.
Fuck, I think I'm buying this... any reason it would be a bad idea now? Anything better about to come out? It seems like Acer is the go to for IPS Gsync monitors.
That's what I thought. I know AMD for one have waxed lyrical about a push for HDR support in 2016 but figured gaming monitors would be a bit behind the big TV brands.
I reckon within a year it'll start showing up in PC displays, so I'll be patient till then. When I have to literally squint my eyes to see clearly when riding my horse towards the sun in The Witcher 3, I'll know the wait would have been worth it.