Gotta be honest. I don't understand that last panel.
Its a reference to Frank Herberts Dune. The main character from the series rides giant sand worms.
Gotta be honest. I don't understand that last panel.
I believe racist people exist and will always exist, but it is a minor issue that is overblown by the left to push socialism. The biggest problem in the black community is no daddies, which was caused by the welfare state encouraging such behavior. Black families were more intact during Jim Crow then they are now. How sad is that? This also hurts whites FYI, just not as much yet.
Advocating harassment (death threats, stalking, rape wishes) of a person who just wants better representation of women in video gaming (& other entertainment, but vidya games are what got this shit train started, NO ONE insults nerds' precious vidya geimz) is "the opposite side of the same cloth" as a woman making some pretty light-weight criticism on current popular culture?
Gotta be honest. I don't understand that last panel.
It's a reference to Dune; basically she becomes the Messiah
Sargon set his followers on a girl working in a shop because she wore a shirt that said the dreaded F word on it.
Anita made a video about how the ways women represented in videogames are distasteful.
Clearly these people are just as vile as each other.
Sargon set his followers on a girl working in a shop because she wore a shirt that said the dreaded F word on it.
Anita made a video about how the ways women represented in videogames are distasteful.
Clearly these people are just as vile as each other.
Gotta be honest. I don't understand that last panel.
Context for the first part: https://lilythelostgirl.com/2017/02/15/a-shirt-that-says-feminism/
I know I'm quoting this very late but HOLEEEEE FUCK
Wow... as if we needed another reason to hate this scumbag.Context for the first part: https://lilythelostgirl.com/2017/02/...says-feminism/
He did no such thing nor had any intention of doing that. Read the article. A line was crossed years ago and it's time to stop normalizing people like Carl's behavior by even remotely insinuating that their ideas hold any sort of weight.I make no comment here on the work of Anita or Carl or anyone else.
I personally think that:
(a) Anita was perfectly OK in doing what she did and in making the comments she did about Carl; and
(b) Carl was perfectly OK sitting in the audience, filming Anita and asking for a debate.
Not from people who've been harassing you for years.A caveat: I am not aware of any death threats or threats of violence having been made against Anita by anyone in that audience (although I know that threats have been made against her in the past). If anyone who had threatened Anita was in that audience, it changes the picture and you then have a scenario where the police can and should get involved to protect Anita.
Bottom line: a certain amount of debate and heckling is OK, but people should not be advocating violence against anyone, whatever their viewpoints.
This is one of the first times they've really left the houseHow is it none of these guys have gotten the shit kicked out of them? Serious question.
I make no comment here on the work of Anita or Carl or anyone else.
I personally think that:
(a) Anita was perfectly OK in doing what she did and in making the comments she did about Carl; and
(b) Carl was perfectly OK sitting in the audience, filming Anita and asking for a debate.
A caveat: I am not aware of any death threats or threats of violence having been made against Anita by anyone in that audience (although I know that threats have been made against her in the past). If anyone who had threatened Anita was in that audience, it changes the picture and you then have a scenario where the police can and should get involved to protect Anita.
Bottom line: a certain amount of debate and heckling is OK, but people should not be advocating violence against anyone, whatever their viewpoints.
Hey. You're objectively wrong.I make no comment here on the work of Anita or Carl or anyone else.
I personally think that:
(a) Anita was perfectly OK in doing what she did and in making the comments she did about Carl; and
(b) Carl was perfectly OK sitting in the audience, filming Anita and asking for a debate.
A caveat: I am not aware of any death threats or threats of violence having been made against Anita by anyone in that audience (although I know that threats have been made against her in the past). If anyone who had threatened Anita was in that audience, it changes the picture and you then have a scenario where the police can and should get involved to protect Anita.
Bottom line: a certain amount of debate and heckling is OK, but people should not be advocating violence against anyone, whatever their viewpoints.
Ah, but you seen I've evolved. Let me tell you how they're both actually *right*Guys I have no knowledge of the situation or the context therein, or the history of the relationship of those involved.
BUT LEMME TELL YOU WHY I THINK THEY'RE BOTH IN THE WRONG HERE.
I make no comment here on the work of Anita or Carl or anyone else.
I personally think that:
(a) Anita was perfectly OK in doing what she did and in making the comments she did about Carl; and
(b) Carl was perfectly OK sitting in the audience, filming Anita and asking for a debate.
A caveat: I am not aware of any death threats or threats of violence having been made against Anita by anyone in that audience (although I know that threats have been made against her in the past). If anyone who had threatened Anita was in that audience, it changes the picture and you then have a scenario where the police can and should get involved to protect Anita.
Bottom line: a certain amount of debate and heckling is OK, but people should not be advocating violence against anyone, whatever their viewpoints.
you're a foolUsually I try to get all the context of a situation before telling people they're wrong, I dunno
Ah, but you seen I've evolved. Let me tell you how they're both actually *right*
No it's not. Why the hell would you think that? If someone gives a speech, you don't have the right to shit talk them. Imagine every time you opened your mouth in public someone shouted 'Fucker!' Before you could say anything. Imagine that happening every single time you tried to say anything in public. Still okay with a little heckling?Bottom line: a certain amount of debate and heckling is OK, but people should not be advocating violence against anyone, whatever their viewpoints.
How is it none of these guys have gotten the shit kicked out of them? Serious question.
Bottom line: a certain amount of debate and heckling is OK, but people should not be advocating violence against anyone, whatever their viewpoints.
you're a fool
No it's not. Why the hell would you think that? If someone gives a speech, you don't have the right to shit talk them. Imagine every time you opened your mouth in public someone shouted 'Fucker!' Before you could say anything. Imagine that happening every single time you tried to say anything in public. Still okay with a little heckling?
I wonder if these people will ever realize how petty they are.
Goddam that's brutal. Can't find a good source online of the panel, but I want to hear how bad it gets. I always hate when people try to keep people from speaking (SPEAKING!), it's crazy when people can't speak unobstructed.
We need more civil communication, not less.
How is it none of these guys have gotten the shit kicked out of them? Serious question.
I'm baffled that someone these guys have harassed haven't done something or a loved one of one of these people hasn't done something that would lead to one of these guys getting thrown a beating.
I make no comment here on the work of Anita or Carl or anyone else.
I personally think that:
(a) Anita was perfectly OK in doing what she did and in making the comments she did about Carl; and
(b) Carl was perfectly OK sitting in the audience, filming Anita and asking for a debate.
A caveat: I am not aware of any death threats or threats of violence having been made against Anita by anyone in that audience (although I know that threats have been made against her in the past). If anyone who had threatened Anita was in that audience, it changes the picture and you then have a scenario where the police can and should get involved to protect Anita.
Bottom line: a certain amount of debate and heckling is OK, but people should not be advocating violence against anyone, whatever their viewpoints.
The Skeptic/Rational community of Youtube has always been garbage.
Sargon and his buddies are professional victims.
Don't Anita and other SJW's make a living off of playing the victim? From what I've seen it seems like they do.
Don't Anita and other SJW's make a living off of playing the victim? From what I've seen it seems like they do.
it really *is* like a hydraDon't Anita and other SJW's make a living off of playing the victim? From what I've seen it seems like they do.
Don't Anita and other SJW's make a living off of playing the victim? From what I've seen it seems like they do.
Join Date: 04-04-2017
Posts
Total Posts: 1 (0.01 posts per day)
it really *is* like a hydra
i hope it was an IP banhmmmm
She's EXTREMELY annoying to me when she talks about gaming . But those other guys are acting actually being bad people, they need to chill out
This was necessary.
Don't Anita and other SJW's make a living off of playing the victim? From what I've seen it seems like they do.