sorathecrow
Neo Member
Video gaming is my hobby, I'm not ashamed of simply having a hobby.
Not at all. At the contrary, i like to point out the superiority of the media over more passive activity like watching stupid TV, which anybody is doing it without any kind of shame.
However, i must say that i feel kind of retarded sometime when i'm playing a game so clearly not designed for my age group that it make me enter full throttle into cringe land of despair, but i still play it because i enjoy the gameplay mechanics.
What with all the deep existential questions about gaming on here today.
Do we not play games to have fun?
I'm ashamed of all the gamers that feel like they have to use slurs all the time. I hear enough of it in online games so knock it off on message boards.
Linguistics 101: words matter. We define the world around us through language. So "gamer" isn't simply its dictionary definition. It's much more than that: you must consider its cultural and social understandings in the globalised world.
Language is NOT a dictionary
Typical sunday, the day of doubt and introspection.
I really feel this is the definitive position on the subject. For the life of me, i can't grasp why there is a need to define yourself this way.
What with all the deep existential questions about gaming on here today.
Do we not play games to have fun?
Think of it as another term for game enthusiast. There are people that watch movies, and then people that really watch movies, keep up with all the releases, post on film messages boards, etc. These are called film enthusiasts. The same applies to gamers. Having a term for it isn't that strange.
I realize that - and I don't begrudge people that want to use it. I just don't get it.
(a) humans are complex. Labels based on hobbies are reductive. Your examples are all valid, but none of those enthusiasts have a similar term
(b) it has been contaminated irreversibly by gamergate, and there is no point in reclaiming it because it wasn't useful in the first place. It's not like we're a marginalized group trying to take something back. If "gamer" became synonymous with "gamergater," I wouldn't be upset, because i don't identify with the term.
I dont think anyone outside of internet gamers care or understand the definition of "gamer" to mean much more than "I play console/pc video games regularly"
yes i feel sick and disgusting
I'm a bit ashamed of being an "old gamer". At 32, if my age ever comes out on an online game, it's like suddenly I am seen like a geezer.
32 is fucking old.....?
As for it being "contaminated", tell that to the countless people who don't know what the fuck gamergate is.
As compared to the vocal majority of the community? We've practically one foot in the grave.
You can bury your head in the sand and pretend that that was not something covered by the mainstream press frequently if you like, but the evidence speaks to the contrary.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/16/...video-game-threats-anita-sarkeesian.html?_r=0
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ill-ever-need-to-read/?utm_term=.73bd402d27c2
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-29616197
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/15/living/gamergate-explainer/index.html
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/the-dangerous-game-gamergate-and-the-alt-right-1.3874259
It was even referenced in Google attacks a few days ago as an -ism.
https://www.theguardian.com/technol...meeting-james-damore-memo-alt-right-gamergate
Recognizing the impact of those events should be the community's focus, not white-washing them. And part of that is definitely the contamination of the term gamer, like it or not, fair or unfair.