• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

First U.S. case of deadly MERS virus confirmed: CDC

Status
Not open for further replies.

WorldStar

Banned
r

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/02/us-usa-health-mers-idUSKBN0DI1CD20140502

(Reuters) - A healthcare worker who had traveled to Saudi Arabia was confirmed as the first U.S. case of Middle East Respiratory Virus (MERS), an often fatal illness, raising new concerns about the rapid spread of such diseases, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Friday.

The male patient traveled via a British Airways flight on April 24 from Riyadh to London, where he changed flights at Heathrow airport to fly to the United States. He landed in Chicago and took a bus to an undisclosed city in Indiana.

On April 27, he experienced respiratory symptoms, including fever, cough and shortness of breath. According to the Indiana State Department of Health, the man visited the emergency department at Community Hospital in Munster, Indiana, on April 28 and was admitted that same day.

Because of his travel history, Indiana health officials tested him for MERS, and sent the samples to the CDC, which confirmed the presence of the virus on Friday.

The virus is similar to the one that caused Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) which emerged in China in 2002-2003 and killed some 800 people. It was first detected in Saudi Arabia in 2012. Dr. Anne Schuchat, director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said on a conference call the first U.S. case of MERS was "of great concern because of its virulence," proving fatal in about a third of infections.

She said the case represents "a very low risk to the broader general public," but MERS has been shown to spread to healthcare workers and there are no known treatments for the virus.

Schuchat said the patient was now in stable condition and there are no other suspected cases of MERS at the current time.

The CDC declined to identify the patient by name or say where he was being treated. It also declined to say on which airlines or bus line the patient traveled. Schuchat said the CDC was working with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to contact individuals who may have been exposed to the patient during his travels.

In Britain, public health officials said they were contacting any passengers who had been sitting near the patient.

Greg Cunningham, a spokesman for the Chicago Department of Aviation, said that the department "has been advised that there is no reason to suspect any risk at O'Hare," Chicago's main international airport. "There has only been one incident confirmed to have MERS, and he is hospitalized in Indiana," he said.

Officials at Community Hospital in Munster confirmed that the man was in good condition, and said the hospital is "maintaining appropriate isolation protocols for the protection of health care staff."

The hospital, located in northwest Indiana about 30 miles (48 km) from Chicago, said it has been working with the CDC and the state health department, and will be tracking the health of the patient's family members and exposed health care workers daily during the next two weeks to check for MERS symptoms.

"This patient was not out in the local community and, therefore, any public exposure was minimal," the hospital said in the statement.

The hospital stressed that transmission of MERS requires close contact, and said the patient's activities in the United States have been very limited, reducing the risk of widespread transmission of the virus.

WORKING SURVEILLANCE

Although the vast majority of MERS cases have been in Saudi Arabia and other countries in the Middle East, the discovery of sporadic cases in Britain, Greece, France, Italy, Malaysia and elsewhere have raised concerns about the potential global spread of the disease by infected airline passengers.

With the addition of the U.S. patient, 262 people in 12 countries have been confirmed to have MERS infections and have been reported to the World Health Organization. Of those, 93 have died, Schuchat said. Infectious disease specialists in the United States said that the fact the newest patient was identified quickly showed that disease surveillance was working.

“It was only a matter of time before the United States had a case,” said virologist Dr. W. Ian Lipkin of Columbia University in New York. “Most of us thought it was not a question of if, but when. Am I more concerned as a result of this case? No.”

“One case does not represent a reason for panic,” agreed Dr. Wayne Marasco, an infectious disease specialist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

“But the very fact that we have a virus with documented person-to-person transmission at a fairly efficient rate and a high mortality rate suggests we have a potentially serious pathogen. There are no therapies out there that I’m aware of, but I don’t think we have a very big risk in the United States.”

Marasco suggests that immigration agents should nevertheless be on heightened alert for passengers arriving in the United States after trips to the Middle East, especially Saudi Arabia.

“They should ask, where did you travel? Have you had contact with animals, with anyone who was sick, and do you have a fever or cough?” he said.

Marasco does not believe that thermal scanners such as those China and other countries deployed during the 2003 SARS epidemic would make much of a difference. That’s because the incubation period for MERS is two to 14 days, “so an asymptomatic traveler could make it through a thermal scanner,” Marasco said.

MYSTERY OF TRANSMISSION

The greatest reason for concern is that so little is known about this coronavirus. It has been found in bats and camels, and many experts say camels are the most likely animal reservoir from which humans become infected.

In part, that ignorance is a result of the lack of cooperation between Middle Eastern countries, where MERS has been spreading, and scientists elsewhere. “One of the biggest problems is that we haven’t had any access to samples from Saudi Arabia, Jordan or Qatar despite my efforts,” Marasco said

Now that the United States has a case of MERS, there might be political pressure for that to change, suggested Lipkin, who pointed out that during the SARS epidemic, China was similarly reluctant to cooperate with western scientists.

“Now the U.S. is going to be more interested. I think it will have an impact on the number of scientists here who will be encouraged to work on MERS and congressmen will stand up and rail about the importance of this,” Lipkin said.
 

Volimar

Member
Add global travel to overpopulation and eventually you'll get a bug that's gonna fix the overpopulation problem. We're overdue.
 

Des0lar

will learn eventually
My GF is going to Saudi Arabia today with a University research group.

I really hope they stay away from that shit.
 

Amagon

Member
So, I'm guessing the movie, Contagion, was actually a documentary that was set in the future. Nice knowing you people!
 

commedieu

Banned
Thank god we have all those fema camps around the nation with inward turned barbed wire.

he was a healthcare worker? Perfect.
 

strobogo

Banned
My cousin works for the Indiana Emergency Preparedness Resource Center and they're taking this extremely seriously right now. Patient Zero not only exposed everyone on the plane, but the bus in Chicago, the little city here in Indiana, and then everyone in the hospital since no one knew there needed to be a quarantine.
 

commedieu

Banned
Yea CDC, don't tell people what planes they were on or anything, to contact you and actually help find out who has made contact with this person.

1. Introduction
A novel coronavirus causing severe respiratory infection was first described in September 2012.1 The virus, which later became known as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), belongs to lineage C of the genus Betacoronavirus and is closely related to bat coronaviruses HKU4 and HKU5.2, 3 Though an animal reservoir is considered likely, none has been identified yet.4 The exact mechanism through which MERS-CoV infection is acquired remains uncertain. Up to 24 July 2013, a total of 90 confirmed cases of MERS-CoV infection have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO), including 45 deaths. The majority of infections are sporadic. Human to human transmission has been documented in at least 3 hospital settings6, 7, 8 and 4 community clusters.9, 10, 11, 12 We report the clinical and epidemiological details of a second family cluster of two confirmed and one probable MERS-CoV infections in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, occurred in February and March 2013. We hypothesize that the index case in the cluster is likely to have acquired the infection whilst in hospital from a contact with unrecognized MERS-CoV infection.


http://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(13)00225-7/fulltext

Superspreader

The epidemic probably started in November last year in southern China's Guangdong province when a businessman became ill with an unusual case of pneumonia. Doctors could not identify what was making him sick. The four health workers who treated him also fell ill. Now, it appears this businessman was the first person to contract SARS.

Understanding how the epidemic is spreading is the key to controlling it. At first, health officials seemed confident that SARS spreads only through so-called droplet transmission—when people infected with SARS cough or sneeze, they release droplets into the air which are then breathed in by someone else. Because of their large size, droplets reach only about three feet (0.9 meter) before falling to the ground.

But the rapid spread of SARS through the Amoy Gardens apartment complex, for example, suggests a more troublesome scenario: that the virus can also spread through airborne transmissions, that is small respiratory aerosol particles that can be breathed in by people. Such particles can hover in the air and travel over a far greater distance than the droplets.

The spread of the epidemic has been erratic. Experts warn that some people may be so-called "superspreaders," or more prone than others to transmit the virus. Superspreaders would carry more of the infectious virus in their respiratory secretions. They probably cough a lot. In an environment that is closed-in, like a hotel or an airplane, they can easily spread the disease.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/04/0409_030409_sars.html

its cousin.

The MERS-CoV laboratory confirmed count currently stands at 148 cases with 63 deaths (PFC of 45.6%) .


The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 provided a stark reminder that novel pathogens could be transmitted along international travel routes with unprecedented speed (1,2). With the realization that an outbreak anywhere in the world poses a potential threat to virtually all countries (3), the US Congress in 2004 authorized the appropriation of funds to establish a global disease detection program, to be named accordingly, based at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with the aim of promptly detecting and mitigating the consequences of emerging infectious diseases globally.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3701798/

When describing the disease, "an urgent global public health threat" are the words that The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta used. How the virus spreads is still a bit of a mystery, but scientists have put together a few pieces of the puzzle. By understanding them, you can protect yourself and your family from falling prey to this deadly disease.

http://www.livinghealthy360.com/index.php/how-does-the-sars-virus-spread-60356/


This recent cluster provides the first clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of this novel coronavirus, coinfection of this novel coronavirus with another pathogen (influenza A), and a case of mild illness associated with this novel coronavirus infection. In light of these developments, updated guidance has been posted on the CDC coronavirus website (http://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/ncv). Persons who develop severe acute lower respiratory illness within 10 days after traveling from the Arabian Peninsula or neighboring countries* should continue to be evaluated according to current guidelines. Persons whose respiratory illness remains unexplained and who meet criteria for "patient under investigation" should be reported immediately to CDC through state and local health departments. Persons who develop severe acute lower respiratory illness of known etiology within 10 days after traveling from the Arabian Peninsula or neighboring countries but who do not respond to appropriate therapy may be considered for evaluation for novel coronavirus infection. In addition, persons who develop severe acute lower respiratory illness who are close contacts† of a symptomatic traveler who developed fever and acute respiratory illness within 10 days of traveling from the Arabian Peninsula or neighboring countries may be considered for evaluation for novel coronavirus infection. Testing of specimens for the novel coronavirus will be conducted at CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6210a4.htm?s_cid=mm6210a4_w
 
If it kills one third of its hosts doesn't that make it a pretty shitty virus?

Also, the articles says that there aren't treatments for the virus, I assume that they mean the actual viral infection itself and not the symptoms. Which, if I understand correctly is how the death rates of most historically deadly viruses have been significantly cut. Treat the symptoms and let the virus run its course.
 

WorldStar

Banned
If it kills one third of its hosts doesn't that make it a pretty shitty virus?

it actually makes it much, much more dangerous than h1n1, west nile, etc.

for example, h1n1 currently only kills 0.01–0.03% of those infected

the fact that this virus kills 1/3 of people infected (or even anything close to that) is actually scary as fuck
 
If it kills one third of its hosts doesn't that make it a pretty shitty virus?

Also, the articles says that there aren't treatments for the virus, I assume that they mean the actual viral infection itself and not the symptoms. Which, if I understand correctly is how the death rates of most historically deadly viruses have been significantly cut. Treat the symptoms and let the virus run its course.

Yeah, I think they just make sure you get the nutrients for your own immune system to work the best
 

brian577

Banned
the fact that this virus kills 1/3 of people infected (or even anything close to that) is actually scary as fuck

Only if it mutates into a more contagious form. The virus has been around for a couple years and isn't running rampant through the Middle East. 200 odd infections over 2 years is hardly cause for alarm.
 

WorldStar

Banned
Only if it mutates into a more contagious form. The virus has been around for a couple years and isn't running rampant through the Middle East. 200 odd infections over 2 years is hardly cause for alarm.

I was solely responding to his comment regarding the fatality rate

yes, it is good that it doesn't seem to be terribly contagious at this time
 

thefro

Member
They are pretty sure they've contained the case in Indiana from spreading (the patient recovered and was released from the hospital).

Might not be simple in Orlando to track everyone doing who was in contact with the person.
 

jmdajr

Member
Sucks, going to Disney World next week. Supposedly no danger to Tourists but still.
My mom called freaking out.

Trying to stay.

Rational
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom