Caesar III
Member
With all this possibilities without move it would be a bloody mess to control.Unbiased Basturd said:
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
LittleBigPlanet 2 - Screens + PR (E3 2010)
- Thread starter alr1ght
- Start date
Honestly I hope they support Move a lot more than they seem to be going to in this one.. Imagine playing a level and drawing out a shape to make a bridge, all while still playing (i.e. no pop-it). Or if they let level creators actually map motions to controls, like they do with the direct seat but for motion movements.. THAT would be a a whole new arena and propel Move forward incredibly..
jump_button
Banned
gofreak said:http://www.abload.de/img/lbp2-3dshooter1w3cl.jpg
My jaw literally went agape when this came on at the conference. Ditto for the RTS stuff...it actually looks like 'proper' RTS :lol
Holy shit at the second post..
So I guess that's what magic glove is?
Excellent.
My mind is boggling at all the info in there...so many ramifications. I feel like I need to read it again...all these new toys and logic tools...the stuff people will come up with I can only imagine now. Also, TTP, your submarine just got a whole lot easier (gyroscope) :lol
I still have questions about how sackboy himself is flipped to be top-down though
Power Gloves may not make it into the game but they are real you can pick up anything and move between layers other sackboys too. the star fox like level is done with the new holograph material that act like gas it can pass into anything
he dont flip top down only in the Direct Control you can hide sackboy too
Move is DLC for LBP1 i think or was it LBP2 :/
djtortilla
Member
awesome
they could make sequels or updates to this game forever.
this game saves this generation
I'm tired of seeing sequels for every other game
we need new ideas like this
they could make sequels or updates to this game forever.
this game saves this generation
I'm tired of seeing sequels for every other game
we need new ideas like this
Leatherface
Member
This game looks amazing. I can't friggin' wait!
jump_button said:
Can you clarify this a bit? Some of the vids clearly show sackboys running around in a top-down way.
Just saw the gamejam video. http://www.youtube.com/user/MediaMolecule
Should have known wexfordian would be from, well, wexford
OgTheClever
Member
I've just made a gif of the 3d shooter section, this really sets the sequel apart from the original:
jump_button
Banned
gofreak said:Can you clarify this a bit? Some of the vids clearly show sackboys running around in a top-down way.
Just saw the gamejam video. http://www.youtube.com/user/MediaMolecule
Should have known wexfordian would be from, well, wexford
what you see is not really top down it is the level on its side as alway the back layer become the floor. what you see have Anti-gravity on it with Magic Joystick useing a direct control
jump_button said:
I understand the gravity bit, and using joystick to control him, but what I don't understand is that he appears 'flipped' - rotated to appear like you are looking at him from top-down. So you can flip sackboy? Or how do they make him look like that?
jump_button
Banned
gofreak said:
you cant flip sackboy, in the direct control you can pick to see sackboy to siting in it top down but you have to be inside the direct control
OgTheClever
Member
Would you be able to make the direct control vehicle invisible to at least give the impression that Sackboy is walking on the walls?jump_button said:
jump_button
Banned
OgTheClever said:
Well the holograph material can be made invisible so yes, I cant see why not, But you can't make the control chair invisible or sackboy will be invisible.
jump_button said:
Ah, I understand now.
Do you know anything about those assets spotted in screenshots that looked like flipped top-down version of assets that are 'side-on' elsewhere? I guess they are just separate versions of the same object then?
One other thing, you say that you use antigrav to make something top down...but in the first videos, for example, they showed the top-down racer, where the cars would fall into the screen...that wouldn't work with antigrav, would it? Is there a way to specify the direction gravity goes in, like to tell it to go into the screen?
And finally, do you know how it is that say in the psychedelic shooter bit, how it is that there appears to be so much 'height' available? I presume this is working by flipping the camera around, but by doing so, what was previously the layers of depth along the z-axis becomes your 'height' y-axis. And there's a limited amount of distance that the layers occupy...so I'm wondering how it is you see sackboy swooping up and down as if there is way more distance suddenly along these axes? Did they make sackboy really small so it appears relatively like there's loads of space/height?
Sorry, I know these are very picky questions...
jump_button
Banned
gofreak said:Ah, I understand now.
Do you know anything about those assets spotted in screenshots that looked like flipped top-down version of assets that are 'side-on' elsewhere? I guess they are just separate versions of the same object then?
One other thing, you say that you use antigrav to make something top down...but in the first videos, for example, they showed the top-down racer, where the cars would fall into the screen...that wouldn't work with antigrav, would it? Is there a way to specify the direction gravity goes in, like to tell it to go into the screen?
And finally, do you know how it is that say in the psychedelic shooter bit, how it is that there appears to be so much 'height' available? I presume this is working by flipping the camera around, but by doing so, what was previously the layers of depth along the z-axis becomes your 'height' y-axis. And there's a limited amount of distance that the layers occupy...so I'm wondering how it is you see sackboy swooping up and down as if there is way more distance suddenly along these axes? Did they make sackboy really small so it appears relatively like there's loads of space/height?
Sorry, I know these are very picky questions...
I didnt look to much into object but i think they just separate versions of the same object I dont real call any fliping object.
as for the cars well that done with movers you can set it so it acts like the back layer in the bottom
the psychedelic shooter is all fake it all on the back layers its the useing the holograph material and the emitters set to shrink and grow. They did show us the Logic but they was alot to take in for a min look lol
Stampy said:
and i didnt say it would look ok
jump_button said:
Cheers.
I was actually just reading IGN's preview where they alluded to how the psychedelic shooter bit was working, and I couldn't believe it, so had to go back to watch the footage again. But I can see know that indeed, with the fixed 'vanishing point' in the distance etc. it couldn't be working with a reorientated camera.
They are crazy, crazy people :lol
IGN talks a bit about the RTS example too:
http://ie.ps3.ign.com/articles/109/1098630p1.html
MisterAnderson
Member
Why would anyone want to use the Move in the creator? Do you realize how imprecise it would be to place objects and stuff?
MisterAnderson
Member
gofreak said:
You have keep your hand/arm perfectly steady if you expect to precisely place objects around your level and such. I'd imagine it would get tedious and I'd much prefer to use a mouse or the analog sticks personally.
jump_button
Banned
Azrael said:
I'm sure someone will, But I like to see more unique and original ideas then just some clones the first week's it out.
the_prime_mover
Member
Man said:
Hmm, wouldn't need much more for an epic Deathstar stage.
MisterAnderson
Member
jump_button
Banned
Way to be unique and original guys *sighs* I dont know why i try
MisterAnderson
Member
jump_button said:
Lol, my post was meant to prove that point.