No platform health is what matters. 'Console wars' would mean the majority - that don't own the X1 - would be in favour of it going multiplatform, not against. Funny that. Read this thread. How many of us are saying 'yay to PC' and yet PC fanboyism can't possibly play a part in any of those replies now, can it?
I have no interest in KI, and right now not much reason to buy an X1. Or any of the current consoles. I don't have any of them because they don't have enough of their own games. First party efforts are not enough, and I don't think it's particularly fair we expect everything of first and second party. Third party exclusives would give everyone another reason to buy a system. Everyone comes to the defence of third parties/publishers not being able to recoup costs in the 'exclusive vs multi' argument, but quite frankly if they made less games and polished them, they could afford to be exclusive.
' ...but more people get to play.'
And how does that stand as a demographic, versus the people that are having their purchase devalued when a former exclusives gets whored out?
The irony is the implication that anyone who votes against is being selfish. No, that would be those wanting to have and play everything, yet pass it off as 'altruism'. Conversely, I'm considerate to the systems and experiences that I have no personal interest in.
This game should not go multiplatform, for the sake of the XBox One. Adding to the irony, is that this is coming from someone who has, console wise, voted Sony the whole time they've been in the running, and is primarily a PC player.
KI to PC is one less reason to get an XBox One, which doesn't have many to begin with. Use your brain. We aren't fanboys. We're the antithesis. We're viewing the situation from a wider FOV.
Now, if anyone would care to explain why the existence of a desired game that can't be played because it's on a system you haven't bought, isn't allowed to be a 'thing'...