Thanks, Damon.
You should see my Prometheus 2 script.
Thanks, Damon.
Seriously? Didn't pay attention.even the newest power rangers (super sentai) has the t rex with feathers.
Jurassic Park isn't just fiction. It damaged science and knowledge. People "learn" by watching movies. It took JP to change the perception of dinosaurs to the public, while paleontologists as early as the late 60s have been changing their views.
Jurassic Park isn't just fiction. It damaged science and knowledge. People "learn" by watching movies. It took JP to change the perception of dinosaurs to the public, while paleontologists as early as the late 60s have been changing their views.
To be realistic I couldn't care less lol. I used to be obsessed with dinosaurs when I was young, wanted to be a paleontologist so bad.
Anyone got any links to studies about feathers on dinosaurs? I find it difficult to believe that you can tell a 65 million year old skeleton had feathers. Hell, I don't even know how you can tell a chicken had feathers just from its skeleton.
The image of T-Rex is already ingrained in popular culture as a big lizard without feathers. It might be inaccurate, but who cares? I like my dinosaurs scaly.
Jurassic Park isn't just fiction. It damaged science and knowledge. People "learn" by watching movies. It took JP to change the perception of dinosaurs to the public, while paleontologists as early as the late 60s have been changing their views.
Exactly. The frog DNA fills in some of the gapsThe Frog DNA caused the dinosaurs to not grow feathers.
Boom.
Afaik the general believe is that larger dinosaurs didn't have feathers because of their ability to keep warm through increased bodymass,
Jurassic Park isn't just fiction. It damaged science and knowledge. People "learn" by watching movies. It took JP to change the perception of dinosaurs to the public, while paleontologists as early as the late 60s have been changing their views.
Who knows what dino-clones grown with frog eggs look like? Maybe they deemed the JP project successful because they got creatures resembling dinosaurs.
How would they come up with an explanation though if they suddenly sprouted feathers?
Do they just conveniently ignore it in-movie or just say the amphibian DNA caused them to have featherless skin?
How would they come up with an explanation though if they suddenly sprouted feathers?
Do they just conveniently ignore it in-movie or just say the amphibian DNA caused them to have featherless skin?
Both the movies and books already took liberties anyway, like the frilled venom-spitting Dilophosaurus and the chameleon-like Carnotaurus.
But why dinosaurs at all? Doesn't he know dinosaur bones were planted in the ground by Satan himself to fool man? And bringing them back just to play God is probably going to make the real God pretty angry? Like Old Testament angry.So he's a creationist too right? He apparently just likes ignoring science.
Also the world is flat.
Seriously? Didn't pay attention.
Exactly. The frog DNA fills in some of the gaps
Aren't velociraptors supposed to be only two feet tall too?
Aren't velociraptors supposed to be only two feet tall too?
Easy to explain away with the movie. Show a young dino loosing its feathers and becoming monsterous behind a glass wall.
Scientist #1: "Its sad that they lose their feathers so early"
Scientist #2: "Maybe one day we'll perfect the cloning process"
BAM DONE
It's not a documentary.
Easy to explain away with the movie. Show a young dino loosing its feathers and becoming monsterous behind a glass wall.
Scientist #1: "Its sad that they lose their feathers so early"
Scientist #2: "Maybe one day we'll perfect the cloning process"
BAM DONE
It's not a documentary.
My idea from another thread:"Aren't they meant to have feathers?"
"The DNA cloning process is complicated, not everything is 100%, these Dinosaurs are featherless. Bald if you will."
Done, feathers written out of JP forever.