Omnistalgic
Member
Very niceDon't be sorry, be better!
Very niceDon't be sorry, be better!
I think Bloodborne 2 will definetely happens. But I predict E3 2018 for the announcement, no way it is next year already.
Next year is Demons Souls Remastered by BluePoint, pretty please?
Damn. So just to be sure, we're looking at 2018-2019 at the earliest, right?
I don't know why the hell I got it in my head that this might be a 2017 game.
I think Bloodborne 2 will definitely happens. But I predict E3 2018 for the announcement, no way it is next year already.
Next year is Demons Souls Remastered by BluePoint, pretty please?
Well that's disappointing news after not seeing or hearing anything really since E3 but oh well.
Thankfully, and hopefully, Red Dead will make up for it.
Maybe. I don't think it'll be there, but who knows, anything could happen. I'm talking about attaching hope to what is probably a 2018 game. Assume the worst when it comes to R* and release dates and you'll probably end up with realistic expectations.
Here are the facts based on what's been said:
-Working on 3 titles, kids game, Armored Core, Dark Fantasy ARPG
-Miyazaki is currently not interested in working on any sequels
-expressed numerous times his interest on working on new things
-the dark fantasy game is souls like
-the game is neither Dark Souls IV or Bloodborne 2
I think they will aim for Holiday 2017 but it will end up being March 2018, like usual for the series.
Just reiterating what I said yesterday the idea that the e3 demo was all smoke and mirrors makes complete sense...
Still no idea why they're trying to humanize Kratos who's a literal psychopath who destroyed an entire nation for revenge in the most violent way possible.
What is strange about Horizon?Nothing about the demo seemed hard to believe to me.In fact it all seemed much more believable than something like Horizon which still seems strange whenever I see it being played(& that's coming out soon)
Starting over with Kratos' story seems fine to me.A better effort than carrying on with his awfulness from the previous games.
What is strange about Horizon?
No worries,Ah ok i didn't know about the kids game, that changes the situation of course
My Bad
Or he could've been ambiguous and said "we're not talking about it right now". Yes I saw your post, I ignored it because I didn't think it was worth replying to but since you insist.
Here are the facts based on what's been said:
-Working on 3 titles, kids game, Armored Core, Dark Fantasy ARPG
-Miyazaki is currently not interested in working on any sequels
-expressed numerous times his interest on working on new things
-the dark fantasy game is souls like
-the game is neither Dark Souls IV or Bloodborne 2
Feel free to speculate and continue to make conspiracy theories. But all of the above is more than enough evidence to it not being Bloodborne 2, could it be a Sony exclusive? Possibly and that's worth discussing.
But there is more evidence against Bloodborne 2 than there is for. Sony could've just asked From to make Demon Souls 2 because of the success of Dark Souls and the fact that they already own that IP, they didn't and let them do whatever they wanted and we got Bloodborne and I can see a similar situation happening with their next game. A spiritual successor with different mechanics and setting.
Just look at how fast the boy is moving to that specific spot at the camera turn and how he freezes up until the audio line that's supposed to make the viewer think the demonstrator pressed a command button finishes up. Or how many contextual animations he has and the egregiousness of the stat pop ups after those contextual animations are finished.Nothing about the demo seemed hard to believe to me.In fact it all seemed much more believable than something like Horizon which still seems strange whenever I see it being played(& that's coming out soon)
Starting over with Kratos' story seems fine to me.A better effort than carrying on with his awfulness from the previous games.
It was showing off the concept not the actual gameplay system that you'll see in the final game. It reminds me of when ND tried to say that this was how the AI worked in UC4 when it's just a scripted animation playing in this moment specifically
It's not getting redesigned they're just going into full fledged production using that vertical slice as reference for the full game in terms of tone and concept.If the game is going back to the drawing boards and getting redesigned, I hope they consider playable Co-op with the son or other characters this time. I mean even FFXV didn't exclude the ability to add co-op in future DLCs.
It's not getting redesigned they're just going into full fledged production using that vertical slice as reference for the full game in terms of tone and concept.
I guess that is a compliment of sorts lol.It just seems too fancy to be real,especially for an open world.
I am NOT doubting its authenticity btw.This is just the impression it gives to me.
The leak was that Sony had a three game deal, people just assumed one of them was Bloodborne 2 because of the CV that leaked. So assuming Miyazaki's telling the truth then, I'd assume "Bloodborne 2" is the new "Demon's Souls 2".
But whatever happens, there's next to no chance it'd appear at PSX anyway. That's the kind of announcement Sony would save for E3. A Demon's Souls remaster doesn't seem THAT unlikely to me though.
It's not getting redesigned they're just going into full fledged production using that vertical slice as reference for the full game in terms of tone and concept.
I mean they'd likely have to stick to their guns even if the reaction was negative. It seems more like a hype piece/proof of concept than anything else.You mean that E3 demo was just an experimentation to check fans' reactions in order to decide whether to continue in that path or not.? Anyway I never doubted that the E3 demo is not an exact part of the full game.
It reminds me of the first Heavy Rain gameplay demo which had one of the main characters as the taxidermist killer but it didn't make it to the final game but was reelased as a DLC with another character.
Remember that despite the promises of faster game development games have been taking longer to develop this gen, there's also a lot of other factors like the entirety of pre-production, like deciding on story, prototyping, setting, concept art, asset creation. I suspect this demo is the culmination of the game's pre-production phase and now they're fully prepared to tackle the full game itself with an internal release date and set budget.I was hoping that they would have been in full fledged production this past few years they've worked on the game.
You can change how that section in UC4 plays out by killing the guys before Sully gets there, I have done this, plus I've had numerous occasions the enemy grab me and Sam help me out so not sure what you're trying to say. Also try and choose a decent gif of the boy running... it's bloody awful, it's about twice as fast due to cut frames compared to the actual video that I just watched of the gameplay trailer.
*snip*
Find me a single gif of Sully helping you out in anyway similar to the way it's presented in that e3 demo, with the camera zooming in, or the enemy making expressions reacting to your ally suddenly coming up and grabbing them as they're attacking you, it seems you misunderstood the point of highlighting that moment specifically or weren't paying attention to the discussion. -_____- Let me highlight it for you, as it's found directly underneath the gif:You can change how that section in UC4 plays out by killing the guys before Sully gets there, I have done this, plus I've had numerous occasions the enemy grab me and Sam help me out so not sure what you're trying to say. Also try and choose a decent gif of the boy running... it's bloody awful, it's about twice as fast due to cut frames compared to the actual video that I just watched of the gameplay trailer.
they eventually added ally AI freeing you from grapples but it was nowhere near as presentation friendly as that moment in the e3 demo as the camera rarely if ever zooms in like that and the enemies certainly don't react right beforehand since the only way to trigger team attacks is if an enemy is already stunned.
I've played UC4 on every difficulty, and played through that segment in particular multiple times, it does not happen like that in the final game. It's scripted, just like the destruction of the object that Nate punches the guy through, none of that is in the final game as it was a more presentation friendly scripted animation playing through the game, since you seem to have trouble, i'm not complaining, i'm explaining how and why these things happen as are other people in the thread but using visual examples. Find me one retail gameplay video of that grab happening in the final game like that.That UC4 section isn't scripted as it doesn't have to play out and can easily be skipped. It's made so that it does happen if you walk in like they do in the demo, but it's not scripted to always happen and it's certainly not AI behavior only for that portion of the game.
The AI can grab you like that and allies do free you from said grabs. Happened to me several times, especially in stealth sections that initially turn into brawls before the guns come out.
So I don't understand the UC4 point. If the AI works like that, is your complaint that what they showed is too polished compared to a variety of cases that can occur?
^ Edit: The grab is scripted to happen in the same way as the demo in the game as well. Just not forced.
*snip*
I'm aware, I love From games and I follow what they're doing pretty closely, even Bloodborne since it was Project Beast, it's why I bought a ps4 and its pretty important to me personally. But I agree with what you're saying, I'm just irritated with everyone that complains about me hating the game and seemingly having some personal vendetta against it so I thought I'd make a post about the reasons it's not in development and yeah, there's definitely no way it's being announced here if it were.
I can see Armored Core being one of said contracted games while the kids game is for the NX. Their new "souls" game could go either way for Sony or multiplat, on one hand I'm sure Sony would love to have another souls game under their belt to convince more players to make the switch but if both the kids game and armored core are exclusives they might want to keep at least one IP they're working on and Microsoft did get marketing for Dark Souls III so they're relationship there seems to be fairly good.
Canned animations specifically like the ones I noted are usually sped up or just oddly janky looking since they're usually made for demo purposes, sorta like a placeholder. Little moments like that are put in a lot of games during scripted segments. You should actually go back and watch some e3 videos and see if you can find the more obvious ones.Please don't be so quick to assume I didn't finish reading the post.
I just didn't understand it until I reread it after seeing Nightengales post clarifying it as I was thinking of a variety of other things when I initially read it, such as that games that do have canned animations that speed up other animations for the character to get into position and so on (or speed up animations and then cancel said animation to start the canned, scripted animation).
So I didn't understand the point you intended because I was thinking of actual game applications that are very similar to the examples you used as evidence of scripting.
Of course, I do agree with your point about the scripted nature of those games you outlined, but my confusion didn't come from not reading your post.
The last game Sony funded that they didn't own was Spyro 3 in 2000, so nah, there's no chance Armored Core is one of them (or the kids game for that matter). Just because From have three games in development, doesn't mean two of them have to be the last two in their Sony deal. It's far more likely that they'll just do one Sony game at a time.
My bet is all three will be Souls-likes because a) Bloodborne's already shown Sony isn't going to tie Miyazaki down to an existing franchise (so he could make three new Souls-like IPs) and b) Souls-likes were the entire point of the deal in the first place. Sony doesn't need a mech or a kids game at all.
As for Microsoft's Dark Souls 3 marketing, that would've been more Bandai Namco than From. As far as I'm aware, there was no marketing deal in Japan and that's the only country From self-published it in.
Canned animations specifically like the ones I noted are usually sped up or just oddly janky looking since they're usually made for demo purposes, sorta like a placeholder. Little moments like that are put in a lot of games during scripted segments. You should actually go back and watch some e3 videos and see if you can find the more obvious ones.
Starting over with Kratos' story seems fine to me.A better effort than carrying on with his awfulness from the previous games.
I don't think Sony will be picking up the kids game, I think that's what From is developing for the NX.
Not sure how I feel about all 3 exclusive titles being souls like, if they're all wildly different in setting and ideas in the way that Bloodborne is to Dark Souls it would be better, but I don't see them forcing them to be a souls machine either when they have talent elsewhere.
Wholeheartedly agree on them not tying them down to one IP though. People love to use the excuse that Bloodborne is popular and made money so that confirms a sequel, but logically it would've been a safer idea to just have them make Demons Souls 2 after the wild success of Dark Souls, instead they gave them creative freedom and he's outright said he's not thinking of it right now and said he wants to make new stuff so I definitely see it being a new IP or a radical reboot of an old one.
It isn't really starting over, this is the same Kratos as far as we know he's just trying to change his ways. Plus the Olympus/Zeus arc had run its course in 3, Ascension was just a step too far. And he wasn't really that awful, most if not all of his kills were justified. Zeus? Justified. Ares? Justified. Hades? Justified. The list goes on. Collateral damage is to be expected when you fuck with a dude on the level the gods fucked with Kratos. I dunno why people give Big K so much crap. It's not like he was just spilling blood for the hell of it. Plus he was still kinda human through all of it. Dude had hope and dreams...of murder but still.
I'd like that a lot more and I'd definitely be down for that Bloodborne is special because it's different and we need more different things so I'm really excited for the reveal of this thing but I don't expect us to see it till next spring which is usually when these things leak.Ah, I completely misread the kids game bit. Sorry, I'm pretty tired.
Yeah, three wildly different departures from the other games is exactly what I was getting at and I think that's how you avoid the "Souls-like machine" you mentioned. Going with Bloodborne instead of Demon's Souls 2 was the right move and based on what Miyazaki's been saying, I'm guessing that would've been a big part of the reason why he agreed to the long term deal in the first place. It's a lot more interesting than just Dark Souls 4-6.
The problem with Kratos is he saw what was going on and continued on. He didn't hesitate or question his actions. He just kept going. The end sequence to GOW3 is proof of how insane and irredeemable he is. It's always been about him and his anger towards people that fucked with him. He didn't care about forgiveness. He didn't care about his family. He didn't care about the world. He's the villain. Not the hero.
Kratos is absolutely as awful as he's made out to be.That goes for everyone. The gods also saw what was going on and continued to provoke Kratos and let the world fall into chaos for their own selfish desires. That's the point I think. No one is a hero in GOW. It's all different shades of red and grey even the only 'good' person, Athena, was in the end out for herself. A villain in a world of villains can't be one. Everyone in the series basically think it's all about them and that's what breeds the conflicts. And he did want forgiveness, it was denied to him. He did love and care for his human family, he'd probabaly do anything to bring them back. Kratos isn't as awful as he's made out to be. I mean no he isn't a sympathetic protagonist but he isn't meant to be. Yes he's irredeemable but then he wasn't seeking redemption. He set goals and he achieved them. I respect that. And that end sequence isn't even half of what Zeus deserved. I also wouldn't say Kratos is insane. Simply a man with nothing left to lose but a life he doesn't desire anymore.
Kratos is absolutely as awful as he's made out to be.
Which ... doesn't exactly fill me with confidence when it comes to when the game will actually be released.
Going back to this list, this takes a lot of wind from the sails of Sony's E3 2016
That goes for everyone. The gods also saw what was going on and continued to provoke Kratos and let the world fall into chaos for their own selfish desires. That's the point I think. No one is a hero in GOW. It's all different shades of red and grey even the only 'good' person, Athena, was in the end out for herself. A villain in a world of villains can't be one. Everyone in the series basically think it's all about them and that's what breeds the conflicts. And he did want forgiveness, it was denied to him. He did love and care for his human family, he'd probabaly do anything to bring them back. Kratos isn't as awful as he's made out to be. I mean no he isn't a sympathetic protagonist but he isn't meant to be. Yes he's irredeemable but then he wasn't seeking redemption. He set goals and he achieved them. I respect that. And that end sequence isn't even half of what Zeus deserved. I also wouldn't say Kratos is insane. Simply a man with nothing left to lose but a life he doesn't desire anymore.
I mean, the ending of God of War 3 has you pounding on circle as many times as you want as Kratos until you've gotten it out your system. He's a fucking psychopath, end of the story. You can't say 'he's not looking for redemption' when it's pretty evident that's what the point of this new God of War is supposed to be. He would rather die and take the world to Hell with him cuz he's been enough to get a Condo for free. He is not well.
I mean, the ending of God of War 3 has you pounding on circle as many times as you want as Kratos until you've gotten it out your system. He's a fucking psychopath, end of the story. You can't say 'he's not looking for redemption' when it's pretty evident that's what the point of this new God of War is supposed to be. He would rather die and take the world to Hell with him cuz he's been enough to get a Condo for free. He is not well.