• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

North Korea fuel prices surge after China cuts oil sales

Justified

Member
Good!

Gasoline and diesel prices surged in North Korea in the weeks after a Chinese state oil company suspended fuel sales to the reclusive state, according to data reviewed by Reuters and an interview with a North Korean defector.

China National Petroleum Corp (CNPC), a state-controlled company, halted diesel and gasoline sales to North Korea "over the last month or two", amid international pressure on Pyongyang to curb its nuclear and missile programs

https://www.yahoo.com/news/north-korea-fuel-prices-surge-china-cuts-oil-064430845--finance.html
 

Justified

Member
I just dreading the choice Kim will make with fall/winter coming up in a few months:

Nuclear missiles or heat to save a million people from freezing to death this winter?
 

Mr Swine

Banned
So what if NK starts threatening to launch a nuke at SK, Japan and Other close countries and at China? Will China just glass the country?
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
Does anyone ever think being hostile to NK on an international level just further promotes the hostility coming out of NK?

Like could it possibly be better if the strategy was just to tell Kim like ok we get it, you are a legitimate regime and it's fine for you to keep developing your nuclear weapons, we are happy to trade with you, you are invited to UN functions and various international meetings. If we could please talk about human rights though, and if you keep on with the violent nuclear rhetoric we will treat you like shit again? OK?

Like wouldn't that be better for the people of NK and the region as a whole (if it actually panned out and didn't just immediately dissolve into the same old shit they've been doing forever)?

And yeah post below, Obama finally tried this approach with Cuba, and now trump is going to shit on it. An yeah Cuba hasn't been nearly as potentially dangerous as NK, but isn't that almost more reason to attempt a friendly approach with NK?
 

Meadows

Banned
Good news. Obama's policy on NK failed (although he didn't fail as badly as almost every other option would have made him), so Trump's change in direction could go well.
 

HStallion

Now what's the next step in your master plan?
Good news. Obama's policy on NK failed (although he didn't fail as badly as almost every other option would have made him), so Trump's change in direction could go well.

I'm really not sure what Trump's change in direction is so far except a lot more military show boating and hot air.
 

Rektash

Member
Does anyone ever think being hostile to NK on an international level just further promotes the hostility coming out of NK?

Like could it possibly be better if the strategy was just to tell Kim like ok we get it, you are a legitimate regime and it's fine for you to keep developing your nuclear weapons, we are happy to trade with you, you are invited to UN functions and various international meetings. If we could please talk about human rights though, and if you keep on with the violent nuclear rhetoric we will treat you like shit again? OK?

Like wouldn't that be better for the people of NK and the region as a whole (if it actually panned out and didn't just immediately dissolve into the same old shit they've been doing forever)?

And yeah post below, Obama finally tried this approach with Cuba, and now trump is going to shit on it. An yeah Cuba hasn't been nearly as potentially dangerous as NK, but isn't that almost more reason to attempt a friendly approach with NK?

History has shown that appeasing dictators is possibly the worst thing you can do.
 

trembli0s

Member
Does anyone ever think being hostile to NK on an international level just further promotes the hostility coming out of NK?

Like could it possibly be better if the strategy was just to tell Kim like ok we get it, you are a legitimate regime and it's fine for you to keep developing your nuclear weapons, we are happy to trade with you, you are invited to UN functions and various international meetings. If we could please talk about human rights though, and if you keep on with the violent nuclear rhetoric we will treat you like shit again? OK?

Like wouldn't that be better for the people of NK and the region as a whole (if it actually panned out and didn't just immediately dissolve into the same old shit they've been doing forever)?

And yeah post below, Obama finally tried this approach with Cuba, and now trump is going to shit on it. An yeah Cuba hasn't been nearly as potentially dangerous as NK, but isn't that almost more reason to attempt a friendly approach with NK?

No. For all of Castro's megalomania and brutality he has never demonstrated the kind of sheer disconnect from reality that Un has. There is nothing rational about a man who poisons his own family with VX nerve agents in public airports or blasts commanders and others who disappoint him by placing them point blank in front of anti-aircraft cannons.

You can't give the man an inch.
 

Somnid

Member
Fuel scarcity might at least impact their military. Kinda hard to transport supplies and such with no fuel.
 

ZOONAMI

Junior Member
No. For all of Castro's megalomania and brutality he has never demonstrated the kind of sheer disconnect from reality that Un has. There is nothing rational about a man who poisons his own family with VX nerve agents in public airports or blasts commanders and others who disappoint him by placing them point blank in front of anti-aircraft cannons.

You can't give the man an inch.

Yeah I guess he really is just too far off the deepend to fuck around with.
 

Iolo

Member
Good news. Obama's policy on NK failed (although he didn't fail as badly as almost every other option would have made him), so Trump's change in direction could go well.

It is going great so far, they have only tested a new IRBM, SLBM, and ICBM since Trump became president. The Obama era of sanctions and strategic patience is over, all hail the Trump era of applying strategic sanctions and waiting patiently.
 

andycapps

Member
Does anyone ever think being hostile to NK on an international level just further promotes the hostility coming out of NK?

Like could it possibly be better if the strategy was just to tell Kim like ok we get it, you are a legitimate regime and it's fine for you to keep developing your nuclear weapons, we are happy to trade with you, you are invited to UN functions and various international meetings. If we could please talk about human rights though, and if you keep on with the violent nuclear rhetoric we will treat you like shit again? OK?

Like wouldn't that be better for the people of NK and the region as a whole (if it actually panned out and didn't just immediately dissolve into the same old shit they've been doing forever)?

And yeah post below, Obama finally tried this approach with Cuba, and now trump is going to shit on it. An yeah Cuba hasn't been nearly as potentially dangerous as NK, but isn't that almost more reason to attempt a friendly approach with NK?

This has been the cycle for many years now, really.. We relax sanctions and give them humanitarian aid when they make enough noise, and it's contingent on continued UN inspections of nuclear programs, etc. Then they eventually kick the inspectors out and rinse and repeat.
 

Micael

Member
For what ever it is worth we are on a forum where someone once said that other countries should have confronted Nazi Germany by sending its people unarmed into Germany to protest (along with sending a ton of money and pictures of children), so you know appeasing to kim jong-un barely even ranks.

Anyway good, hopefully it is just the first step, since realistically China is the only country in a position to actually do something besides invading, which is something that is borderline a non option.
 
Last time North Korea went through a lot of suffering in the 1990s, the communist economy collapsed and has been replaced a sort of restricted state capitalism where the state doesn't have as much control. So we know stuff like this does loosen the grip the government has on its people.

Devastating for the 12 people that drive in Pyongyang.

North Korean winters are no joke.
 
This sounds bad.

This whole situation is bad.

I will be shocked if this doesn't end up leading to:

  1. A: NK launching a nuke eventually
  2. B: Starting some shit, which causes our dipshit of a president to nuke their country which would be an international travesty.
 

Jombie

Member
Last time North Korea went through a lot of suffering in the 1990s, the communist collapsed and has been replaced a sort of restricted state capitalism where the state doesn't have as much control. So we know stuff like this does loosen the grip the government has on its people.



North Korean winters are no joke.

It was a joke, but implying that the people hurt by this will be the people already at the mercy of the government this is supposed to halt.
 

Xe4

Banned
It sucks that this hurts the people suffering in Korea, but pressure needs to be applied. Nothing else works, or will work until the Kim's are out of power.
 

commedieu

Banned
This sounds bad.

This whole situation is bad.

I will be shocked if this doesn't end up leading to:

  1. A: NK launching a nuke eventually
  2. B: Starting some shit, which causes our dipshit of a president to nuke their country which would be an international travesty.


Not without China. This is like that pug cursing in the kitchen gif.
 

Polari

Member
Does anyone ever think being hostile to NK on an international level just further promotes the hostility coming out of NK?

Like could it possibly be better if the strategy was just to tell Kim like ok we get it, you are a legitimate regime and it's fine for you to keep developing your nuclear weapons, we are happy to trade with you, you are invited to UN functions and various international meetings. If we could please talk about human rights though, and if you keep on with the violent nuclear rhetoric we will treat you like shit again? OK?

Like wouldn't that be better for the people of NK and the region as a whole (if it actually panned out and didn't just immediately dissolve into the same old shit they've been doing forever)?

And yeah post below, Obama finally tried this approach with Cuba, and now trump is going to shit on it. An yeah Cuba hasn't been nearly as potentially dangerous as NK, but isn't that almost more reason to attempt a friendly approach with NK?

The current plan definitely isn't working.

I think once North Korea gets nukes (and it will) trying to open the country up through trade is the way forward. But it's difficult to justify until we get to that point.
 
Top Bottom