Guys, I don't know if this was already posted, but here we go!
It's obligatory:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXJ3FFOXvOQ
Ah good old exposure dollars. Sadly it happens a lot too :/
I think this was a couple of years ago, we all looked awkward at that age lol.Is it me or does he look like a cartoon character?
"The final nail of their coffin is when pewdiepie calls them out on their BS"
lol
Another straightforward, level-headed breakdown from Foldable Human
Will they drop below 13m?
They made a reaction video on a school shooting?
The fuck...
Maybe this has been addressed yet but, setting aside the format and content questions, how does a trademark on "react" or "____ reacts" even work from a legal perspective? Its entirely descriptive. My company had to brainstorm two dozen possible names and our lawyers rejected almost all of them on the basis of things like just including the word "glow" in a product that has a glowing feature being too close to description
[..]
Q: Isn't superhero just a descriptive word? I thought you couldn't trademark a descriptive word?
A: Under normal trademark law, a descriptive mark would not be granted a trademark, but I believe that Marvel and DC can demonstrate (and, I believe, have demonstrated it to the Trademark office, leading to the granting of the registered mark) that the term has acquired distinctiveness, which would allow it to still become a registered trademark.
I believe (and I think that it is an accurate belief) that the term "superhero" has achieved the required "Secondary meaning" in the United States to be eligible for a trademark.
When someone thinks of a superhero, they undoubtedly (which, as I said, would be proven via the use of surveys) think of a product from either DC or Marvel. The term "superhero" has become distinctly known as coming from DC or Marvel, just like how Band-Aid describes a bandage, but it has acquired secondary meaning as a brand of bandages, even though Band-Aid certainly is a descriptive term.
To be fair, it's to gather their thoughts on school shootings which in and of itself isn't a terrible idea.They made a reaction video on a school shooting?
The fuck...
You might just have decent lawyers, I don't think it'll make it through the opposotion process with all this attention.Maybe this has been addressed yet but, setting aside the format and content questions, how does a trademark on "react" or "____ reacts" even work from a legal perspective? Its entirely descriptive. My company had to brainstorm two dozen possible names and our lawyers rejected almost all of them on the basis of things like just including the word "glow" in a product that has a glowing feature being too close to description
I'm amazed they haven't made a video saying they see everyone's point, agree they overstepped their bounds and are no longer moving forward with React World.
They need to cut their losses already.
Why give them these views?
I'm surprised this is still going on. I'd have thought this would have fizzled out before the end of the weekend.
On YouTube, a view is only recorded after watching a video for 30 seconds.
I'm surprised this is still going on. I'd have thought this would have fizzled out before the end of the weekend.
On YouTube, a view is only recorded after watching a video for 30 seconds.
Closing in on 250,000 subs lost. Awesome.
https://twitter.com/tealgamemaster/status/694316773177430017
This tweet makes a good point. "React" is getting all the attention, but their "Lyric Breakdown" trademark is just as bad.
That's nearing 2% then. Going off of the 14,080,whatever it was (think it was 800?) subs they initially had.
To be fair, it's to gather their thoughts on school shootings which in and of itself isn't a terrible idea.
https://twitter.com/tealgamemaster/status/694316773177430017
This tweet makes a good point. "React" is getting all the attention, but their "Lyric Breakdown" trademark is just as bad.
I'm trying to reconcile the type of person who would subscribe to the channel in the first place also caring enough about this fuckery to unsubscribe.
Subs != engaged usersclosing in on 250k lost subscribers
even if that's a small dent in their overall numbers, losing a quarter of a million this rapidly is pretty huge.
can't say they don't deserve it
Subs != engaged users
Watches, unsubs, likes, dislikes = engaged users
This has more of an affect than people think.
Subs != engaged users
Watches, unsubs, likes, dislikes = engaged users
This has more of an affect than people think.
Yeah
It's not like every one of their videos has a minimum of 14 million views, losing engaged subs and losing more than gaining each day is fucking huge.
Tue this, guys.youtube has been focusing a lot more on "watch time" as the important metric lately
so all the "click, dislike, leave" is certainly gonna have a negative impact
Is it me or does he look like a cartoon character?
Will they drop below 13m?
Youtube just threw them under the bus. At the top of the Trending page is a mention of what the Fine Brothers are attempting to do, the backlash, and a link to their "Please understand." video.
Youtube just threw them under the bus. At the top of the Trending page is a mention of what the Fine Brothers are attempting to do, the backlash, and a link to their "Please understand." video.
If they do lose a million followers... that's extremely nuts and something that doesn't happen at all on youtube really, shows how big of a fuck up this move was.
Youtube just threw them under the bus. At the top of the Trending page is a mention of what the Fine Brothers are attempting to do, the backlash, and a link to their "Please understand." video.
Compared to their earlier videos of just sitting in a classroom with a laptop on the tablet, they have make up people to smarten up people on camera, I mean they got the dollars to do it so they do it.
There's nothing wrong with this video. Made me tear up actually with some of the kids' reactions.
Keep the pile on directed where it belongs - and that's with the Fine Bros's excessive hubris/greed.