Hmm sounds like it may not be worth paying full price for just the campaign.
Are you not interested in the multiplayer?
Hmm sounds like it may not be worth paying full price for just the campaign.
Arthur Gies should not be reviewing anything PS related, let alone an exclusive. Not saying that his score is biased, but knowing his history towards Sony. It kinda points to that. It's like seeing a turd few meters away and wondering if it stinks. No reason to check it out, it does stink
I'm honestly quite ok with this. All of the single-player footage I've seen looks pretty damn fun.Watch some of the single player videos and you'll see some genuinely fun looking stuff. I'm sure the single player will just be added fun but not the set-piece driven stuff we've become accustomed too.
I don't know where it is, but someone posted a video of the second level in Starhawk on YouTube with some awesome looking space combat.
That sounds great.If you have someone to split screen with, I think anyone would have a great time with it. It's new, cool, and feature-complete.
What else did he review that was pretty biased? I just like to know so I can avoid reviews by those type of people. I hate when people can't be objective, or when they're jaded and clearly won't even give a game a chance, regardless of exclusivity or not.
He didn't review it but he said Uncharted 3 was one of his worst experiences of 2011.
He didn't review it but he said Uncharted 3 was one of his worst experiences of 2011.
http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/starhawkStarhawk is a solid multiplayer experience, though the vehicles and design are derivative, and fans of Warhawk will no doubt appreciate the build-your-own defense gameplay innovations. However, its workman-like tutorial "campaign" was short and bland and the multiplayer didn't "hook" me.
http://www.gamingxp.com/bericht-5603-konami-reverge_labs-ps3-skullgirls.htmDespite flawed controls and disappointing graphics, Starhawk delivers a great online multiplayer experience with a varied gameplay and innovative features.
Warhawk didn't even have a single player and I thought it was still worth the $60. News of the lackluster story mode here isn't deterring my purchase decision.
Of course teamwork of course you will need teamwork for victory, to expect otherwise is kinda silly.
Not really no. I generally don't like adversarial MP.Are you not interested in the multiplayer?
Not everyone has the same opinions. I'd rather play against the computer/bots than people online, it's just my preference.The single player is basically the multiplayer, but with a hint of story and less-fun, stupid AI to shoot instead of real players. Why would anyone buy this game just for the single player?
You can play the co-op solo as well.Not really no. I generally don't like adversarial MP.
Not everyone has the same opinions. I'd rather play against the computer/bots than people online, it's just my preference.
I'm shocked at the amount of mediocre scores I'm seeing here. I guess it was to be expected considering how different the game is, but I really expected a higher average.
Gamespot, Gametrailers, and G4 are notably absent so far, maybe they'll drive the average up a bit, but right now we're looking at a C/7.5 or so average.
That's like the horde mode right?You can play the co-op solo as well.
Yeah.That's like the horde mode right?
8s are mediocre? We truly are rating on a 7 to 10 scale
its workman-like tutorial "campaign" was short and bland
I still think Sony should sell the online for 30 on psn
Epic fail.
it's either a "real" single player campaign or don't bother at all making a campaign and just sell your game cheaper as MP only game, these multiplayer maps with bots-like SP mods in games like Twisted Metal and now this one are always crap,lazy devs should learns from games like CoD, BF ,Gears or Uncharted, games with great SP and MP.
I'll pass
Of course teamwork of course you will need teamwork for victory, to expect otherwise is kinda silly.
So its a negative because it wont let you be a lone wolf?
Edit:Not sure quite sure what battlefield like moments are.
http://www.meristation.com/es/playstation-3/starhawk/analisis-juego/1535163Team tactics is something really rare to see in shooters, specially in close combat, but Starhawk provides the tools to enjoy great battles where the strategy is as important as the aiming skills. LightBox Entertainment did a great job redefining the original Warhawk, from the aesthetics to the gameplay.
Thats the only review that really annoyed me.I don't know that seems to be a writeoff for some people I remember seeing similiar oppinions from some (mostly COD friends) when Battlefield 3 launched. I dont think that should be a detractor at all.
In regards to SP I wonder if because this game isn't scripted and the combat situations are left completely up to the player; if thats the reason why there is a such a difference of views on whether the SP combat encounters are rewarding or not?
It was $60 for the game and the Jabra bluetooth headset. $40 to download just the game.I don't think Warhawk was ever 60 dollars
(I would have gladly paid 600 for it though, best game ever)
I don't think Warhawk was ever 60 dollars
(I would have gladly paid 600 for it though, best game ever)
Zones mode.The thing is trying something new isn't a bad thing it just needs to be well executed. I'm sorry but empty maps and a team building limit that is gone in the first few minutes isn't what I would call well executed. Build and battle became the game not something that helped the game.
I would have preferred established bases that are captureable and build and battle was then used to flesh out defenses and maybe build jet packs. Instead I get elaborate home bases and not much in between.
I could be wrong, but I think it was $60 boxed with a headset and $40 digital download. I got it with the mic.
Epic fail? Really?Epic fail.
it's either a "real" single player campaign or don't bother at all making a campaign and just sell your game cheaper as MP only game, these multiplayer maps with bots-like SP mods in games like Twisted Metal and now this one are always crap,lazy devs should learns from games like CoD, BF ,Gears or Uncharted, games with great SP and MP.
I'll pass
You mean the campaign and the horde mode or is there a fully featured bot mode too?Epic fail? Really?
All I ever wanted from Warhawk aside from its amazingness, was a mode with bots to annihilate after bad games. I get that in 2 modes now in Starhawk.
Lmao at "epic fail". Expecting an Oscar worthy script much? It's an open-action structure game. This isn't a linear, cinematic experience. Could it have been? Sure. I'm not going to get my panties twisted because it isn't.
Not really no. I generally don't like adversarial MP.