Going back and reading the thread for the 150Mhz boost to the X1 CPU is hilarious.
I wonder if Digital Foundry will take down their article about the X1 having a major advantage on the CPU side of things now?
Why? We don't even know which generation of i7 it is or its frequency. Ivy Bridge is roughly 2x IPC performance of Jaguar per core:More interesting: Why is it only above 2x better than PS4's CPU? It should easily wipe the floor with PS4's CPU.
Going back and reading the thread for the 150Mhz boost to the X1 CPU is hilarious.
I wonder if Digital Foundry will take down their article about the X1 having a major advantage on the CPU side of things now?
First party games.
Isn't this just a case where the Xbox One is simply using less CPU for these kinds of tasks due to the way in which the Xbox One's resources are partitioned and reserved between 3 operating systems to allow the kind of multi-tasking that the system does even while a full fledged game is running, not to mention the Kinect reservation that's likely always there whether you have it plugged in or not?
Isn't that all that's happening here? Both systems are, afterall, running more or less the same CPU, unless of course the PS4 CPU is clocked higher than we all thought, in which case, the way the Xbox One's resources are partitioned probably matters a lot less in that scenario if we're simply dealing with a PS4 CPU that's just clocked higher than the Xbox One's, but somehow I have a feeling this is a similar deal as those browser benchmarks that were ran before.
I'm amazing people are still so ignorant as to think this is any previous generation. Previous generations, system had different CPU architectures altogether. This is really the first generation where both system have virtually identical internals, with various tweaks in each. CPU wise though, both are the same. So really, the only difference is going to be clock speed and memory bandwidth.
Based on this graph? This would make me laugh.
Such as? All the launch games for both platforms were underwhelming, and Sony's first party is undeniably stronger than MS's. With 343i at the helm of Halo, I feel it's relevance will just continue to get smaller and smaller
It needs saving?
Why? We don't even know which generation of i7 it is or its frequency. Ivy Bridge is roughly 2x IPC performance of Jaguar per core:
The things is the Xone gets to 1.75Ghz faster.
So DF making an article that the X1 CPU is a big advantage over the PS4 CPU ( without knowing the PS4's actual CPU specs mind you ) was A-OK in your book.
DerZuhälter;94277137 said:
The things is the Xone gets to 1.75Ghz faster.
Not sure if serious?The things is the Xone gets to 1.75Ghz faster.
Yes, you can get more out of the PS4's CPU than you can the Xbox's.
The PS4 CPU has more performance available for games, the reason why the XB1 is performing worse doesn't really matter does it?
Seriously though, who's Matt?
Is related?Wow. I wonder if this is because of virtualization overhead...
The CPU overhead associated with running a guest operating system in a Hyper-V virtual machine was found to range between 9 and 12%. For example, a guest operating system running on a Hyper-V virtual machine typically had available 88-91% of the CPU resources available to an equivalent operating system running on physical hardware.
The things is the Xone gets to 1.75Ghz faster.
Third party developer working on PS4/XB1.
Well done Freeman lol.The things is the Xone gets to 1.75Ghz faster.
I think the XO is quite different.
What 343 did to Halo makes me sad...
I hate these types of posts since I don't see any developer whining about it.Both CPUs are ass. This is kind of a non-story, so I don't see much controversy.
Been wondering since forever why the XB1 has a chip that supports two different versions of wireless screen sharing protocol, yet has no screen sharing capabilities to speak of present or announced for the future.
So much potential literally being ignored.
I enjoyed it myself. I wasn't on the forums when it came out, I had no idea so many people disliked the game.
I hate these types of posts since I don't see any developer whining about it.
can anyone remind me the name of the website where that guy writes in poorly written english (it's not his native language) about XO's real superiority in a cryptic, conspiratorial tone.
It's always a fascinating read.
(peripherally on topic, since I'm curious how he'd possibly spin this new finding)
Especially considering the leaked roadmap made such a big deal out of it. I think either it was half baked and not ready for primetime (though that doesn't usually stop MS) or it's another case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing (which also doesn't usually stop MS). Perhaps E3 will have some new functionality/service announcements?
The things is the Xone gets to 1.75Ghz faster.
The PS4 CPU has more performance available for games, the reason why the XB1 is performing worse doesn't really matter does it?
They aren't. They are on par with dual-core Ivy Bridge @ 2.4GHz, which happens to be above the average PC/notebook CPU sold this year. Never mind older PCs that are still in active use.Both CPUs are ass.
175MHz for the CPU. The 53MHz relates to the GPU.
Still, it makes no difference in the age of GPU compute. Both CPUs are very weak, around the same power as what is expected from top line mobile processors in 2014.
can anyone remind me the name of the website where that guy writes in poorly written english (it's not his native language) about XO's real superiority in a cryptic, conspiratorial tone.
It's always a fascinating read.
(peripherally on topic, since I'm curious how he'd possibly spin this new finding)
Guys, Guys the Xbox One is selling so that means people don't care!
I hate these types of posts since I don't see any developer whining about it.
I don't see developers whining about anything at the moment so lets close down the whole thread
Fun fact for both of you. Developers are bound by NDA's, which means you're almost never hear them whine about either console, ever. At best you get fluffy comments about how both are great, and "pretty similar", etc. In other words, putting a lot of weight into developer comments is pretty silly. They're all towing the line they are legally bound by.
Only on a rare occasion do you get genuine honesty out of them, usually when someone fucks up.