The Abominable Snowman
Member
This would not be able to run any x86 steam games.It kind of makes more sense now with Steam pushing onto Linux and in home streaming becoming viable.
This would not be able to run any x86 steam games.It kind of makes more sense now with Steam pushing onto Linux and in home streaming becoming viable.
This would not be able to run any x86 steam games.
why not? Did I miss something about the specs. THought this was x86.
It's ARM based
I wonder if there's some kind of licensing reason they didn't just aim for Android from jump. The community for Linux has steadily bled and dried up over the last 5 years to the point where popular projects that started on Linux have begun to fall behind their counterparts on other OS offerings. In addition, the hardware's spec is probably high enough to mitigate much of the Android HW performance qualms.
I wonder if there's some kind of licensing reason they didn't just aim for Android from jump. The community for Linux has steadily bled and dried up over the last 5 years to the point where popular projects that started on Linux have begun to fall behind their counterparts on other OS offerings. In addition, the hardware's spec is probably high enough to mitigate much of the Android HW performance qualms.
They prefer using a full OS in a small form factor. That's also why they prefer a resistive screen to capacitive--it lets you use a stylus (it'd be much more expensive/difficult to use a capacitive digitizer stylus) which is crucial for navigating the OS. Well, you can also use the analog nubs to move/click the mouse which also works really well, but sometimes you just want to tap the screen. They've said there'll be fake multitouch, so I don't know how that will turn out. As for Android, someone ported it to Pandora so I imagine someone will make a build for it on the Pyra (probably very soon after release if not before). It works really well, and you can set it up to use the gaming controls in games. Imagine playing GTA San Andreas with the awful touchscreen controls, then imagine using the full controls on a device like this with a 5" 1080p screen connected or through HDMI out. That's the idea.
A 128 gb Surgace pro is 500$
Show me a tablet that's more powerfull for that price.
Edit : also the surface pro is 1080p, the Edge is 768p
We're talking gaming devices here. 1080p is a huge disadvantage, not a plus. Surface will never be able to run anything advanced at that res and lowering to non-native makes the visuals look like crap
Anyway..Acer Iconias are in similiar price as Surface.
That said, I don't get your argument. Sure, if you work hard enough you can stack up criterias precisely in such way that Surface will come on top, but what's the point? It's neither the most portable nor most powerful tablet. I guess if you're looking for "semi powerul, semi portablet, not cheap, but not very expensive tablet that either already stopped being produced or soon will" then yeah..Surface Pro is indeed the very best choice
Evildragon said:Oh, and about "Why not using an Intel?"
Well... to be honest: I rather be safe and sure than risky and sorry.
When we decided what SoC to use, no one knew if the mobile market will ever switch over to Intel.
There are many Android games out there that probably wouldn't work anymore - and we would also lose all the optimized ARM emulators out there like PPSSPP or PCSXReARMed.
Yeah, I know, it exists for x86 as well - but it's probably not as optimized and therefore drains more battery...
It was too risky for a small company like ourselves - so it's best to stick to ARM right now.
You claimed to be able to find a cheaper and more powerfull tablet than a Surface Pro.
.
No, I didn't. Where the hell did you read that?
ED's talked about why they went with the OMAP5 for the pyra:
http://boards.openpandora.org/topic/15560-soc-back-and-forth/
Specifically on x86:
So perhaps next time.
Bluestacks is a propietary solution that runs on propietary operating systems (not linux), i don't know what you can expect them to do with something like that or genymotion, they would have to strike licensing deals and go through a bunch of hurdles, technical, cost and performance wise that you can easily mitigate by just going ARM.About x86, wouldn't Bluestacks solve the problem ?
About x86, wouldn't Bluestacks solve the problem ?
PRESS RELEASE
18th June 2015
SMACH Zero will be the first handheld console that runs Steam OS, offering a new way of playing Steam games everywhere. The final specs of SMACH Zero are the following:
- AMD embedded G-Series SoC "Steppe Eagle" with Jaguar-based CPU and GCN-based Radeon graphics.
- 4 GB RAM memory
- 32GB internal memory and SD Card Slot
- USB OTG
- 5-inch Touch screen with 720p resolution
- Configurable tactile gamepads
- HDMI video output connection
- Wi-Fi conectivity
- Bluetooth connectivity
- 4G mobile network connectivity (PRO model only)
The hardware specification offers a balance between performance and cost, that will permit to play more than 1,000 games in Steam from the day one.
The console keys scheme will be similar to the latest version of the official Steam Controller, making use of two touch pads, a control stick, 7 buttons on the front face and 6 in the rear.
SMACH Zero is expected to be launched in 2016. More information about price and availability will be given during the next Gamescom, in August 2015.
Note: SMACH is a third party, not developed by Valve Corporation. SMACH Zero is officially the new name for Steamboy Project.
This still hasn't released? LOL
EvilDragon is a great guy and all, but he's certainly been working with a few more people on this. That said, they're definitely not anything close to a big company. And this seems to be going much more smoothly than the Pandora, thanks in no small part to past mistakes.Putting this all together has been entirely the work of one person.