• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo demoed Switch 2 to devs at Gamescom | Sources Claim it runs Matrix UE5 Demo With Comparable Graphics to PS5/XSX

Drell

Member
Snes was competitive to the genesis in many ways, and the n64 actually broke 3d ground when it first launched, so not sure what your talking about on those two.
"I don't get why people are so assblasted that Nintendo has a comparable level of power to its competition again, as if the SNES/N64/GameCube never existed."
I'm not native english but, isn't that exactly what they said?
 

jorgejjvr

Member
That's the thing. Top end hardware isn't necessary to run a tech demo that appears very impressive to a passive observer, especially when they are used to Switch 1. They just had to leave behind an 8 year old phone chip.

Going from the X1 to whatever Nvidia has now doable in the $299-399 range will be a massive step up no matter how you look at it. Do you guys realize this tech is literally 8 years apart, and Switch 2 is coming out 3 years after PS5/XSX. Getting in touch with reality goes both ways.
I still don't trust Nintendo to be at the top of the line. They could be using tech older than what's inside a ps5, 5 year old tech for all I know.

I'll believe it when I see it. I'll take the beefiest switch Nintendo pulls out, I don't care if I pay $700. I want it. So it's not a matter of wanting it to be real. I'll just rather be realistic and wait and see, and expect the worst from them, to not be disappointed 😂

If they come up with something very comparable then I'll be shocked and celebrate
 
Last edited:

Montauk

Member
This sounds ok but I’m gonna hold for the Switch 2 Pro. Early rumours suggest it’ll run games at 8K/240 and will be able to render Avatar 2 level graphics in real time.

The BOTW remake is rumoured to be a launch title for it and it’s aiming for 99 MC, minimum.

Which I fully believe is the score it deserves and I’m already writing up death threats ready to send them to any “journalist “ who rates it too low, if and when that happens (I bet it happens!)
 
Last edited:

Golgo 13

The Man With The Golden Dong
Good question and it’s mainly the same reason that Apple gave developers their development tools for Vision Pro less than a year from the projected release of the Vision Pro (and yes I know these are different platforms but the logic is the same). The same could also be said of the rumors that certain 3rd parties just now got their hands on the PS5 pro dev kits when the system is expected to launch next year.

The purpose is to give 3rd party developers a ballpark performance estimate of what the system can handle as a way to entice them to move their CURRENT & PAST projects into the Switch 2. This way we may be able to get some ports and multi-platform releases to help fill the launch lineup (for example: the rumor of FF7 remake running on Switch 2 hardware). Developers do not need several years to enable them to port over existing projects and as someone who has worked on games projects, I can promise you, the amount of time Nintendo has given them is more than enough to get something ready by launch (it’s mainly a factor of optimization and then working in whatever new gimmick’s Nintendo has).

When it comes to NEW projects, this will also give them a target to shoot for. However, if this meeting really did take place, the purpose would not be for developers to create a brand new Switch 2 exclusive ready for the systems launch. That wouldn’t be enough time as you pointed out. However, best believe Nintendo’s 1st parties have had access to the Switch 2 specs for years (and probably played a big part in choosing certain aspects of the system performance such as Ram amount) and that’s where we will see the Switch 2 exclusive launch titles.

TLDR: The primary purpose for this meeting would be to show off what the new system can do to encourage 3rd parties to port over past projects and include the Switch 2 in their current projects. Less than a year is enough time for that purpose.
Appreciate this - very informative. I’m surprised that a port can be done in a years time! Always thought it was take much longer than that.
 

jorgejjvr

Member
Current consoles are already struggling, so much so Sony wants a PS5 pro already lol and here we are saying switch 2 is comparable to ps5 lol

I know dlss can pull some miracles on the PC space, but I just don't buy it.

But I would LOVE to be wrong. Please let me be wrong
 
Last edited:

Montauk

Member
Found these comments on reddit rather interesting.





Oh FFS, this is inaccurate. I was there. Those guys weren’t at the Nintendo area, they were at the Sony area.

I heard from an industry friend that Sony had invited friendly journos to an exclusive demo allowing them to enjoy themselves with 19 inches of Venom.

It was a closed door event for obvious reasons.

I saw a load of guys from Push Square leaving the area behind the guards looking pretty happy.
 
Last edited:

SaintALia

Member
Question - and please don’t “guess answer” if you’re not sure.

Why would Nintendo hold a behind-the-scenes developer “preview” of a system that presumably comes out, at max, 1 year from now?

If it truly does come out in 1 year, developers would’ve needed access to a development kit (or at least the specs) for several years already. Otherwise how would games be available to launch with the system in late 2024 if Nintendo is just now “previewing” capabilities? The end of the article says development kits are landing in the hands of key partners… just now? A year from launch?

We also already know this wasn’t shown to journalists - only developers. Unless I’m missing something, this doesn’t line up.

Also keep in mind everyone was wrong about Switch 1, pretty much about everything. Euro gamer also perpetuated the rumors about a Switch Pro for years.
I think all companies do this. First party and close partners(second party and outside larger partners) are cranking away at software, but there are a lot of other developers outside of that. Basically, they should have launch window software + locked down.

As for dev kits, I think you have 'target specs' dev kits, and actual hardware dev kits.


They were? I thought people found out that Switch was basically Wii U +, but with a btter CPU and more modern GPU. I stopped following the some of the rumours about it after a while though, so I don't know how many people were still fighting the good fight about it's hardware prowess. The Wii U stuff was funny though, I remember people having some ridiculous expectations of that, until the truth hit a lot of people...HARD.
Also keep in mind everyone was wrong about Switch 1
 

Dacvak

No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
Lol don't get over hyped y'all, it's Nintendo after all. Top end hardware isn't their thing
I heard that Nintendo secretly bought Nvidia behind closed doors at Gamescom and Miyamoto has already revealed DLSS 4.2 to them.
 

BlackTron

Member
I still don't trust Nintendo to be at the top of the line. They could be using tech older than what's inside a ps5, 5 year old tech for all I know.

I'll believe it when I see it. I'll take the beefiest switch Nintendo pulls out, I don't care if I pay $700. I want it. So it's not a matter of wanting it to be real. I'll just rather be realistic and wait and see, and expect the worst from them, to not be disappointed 😂

If they come up with something very comparable then I'll be shocked and celebrate
Current consoles are already struggling, so much so Sony wants a PS5 pro already lol and here we are saying switch 2 is comparable to ps5 lol

I know dlss can pull some miracles on the PC space, but I just don't buy it.

But I would LOVE to be wrong. Please let me be wrong

Switch 2 isn't going to be a portable PS5. It's just going to kick the pants off Switch 1 and punch way above its weight while managing to play many current gen games better than you would have expected with the "handhelds/Nintendo sucks" attitude they've conditioned everyone into with an 8 year old phone chip this whole time. It will have glorious 1p games and not be such a distant step child for 3p. It's not going to be a "top end" beast that runs games at 60FPS with ray tracing at 4k and tons of effects.
 

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
"I don't get why people are so assblasted that Nintendo has a comparable level of power to its competition again, as if the SNES/N64/GameCube never existed."
I'm not native english but, isn't that exactly what they said?

Ah ok, I reread it, looks like I may have had it twisted.
 
Last edited:

skyfall

Member
zelda1bu1l.gif

It's finally going to be real & it's going to be glorious
 
Last edited:

Golgo 13

The Man With The Golden Dong
To be fair, everyone of the so called "reliable leakers" like NateDrake etc. were droning on and on about the Switch Pro. And then proceeded to gaslight everyone when it turned out to only be a revision with an OLED instead.

So the only lesson here is: Unless it comes straight from Nintendo's mouth, treat everyone as the bullshitters they are.
Nintendo's wall of secrecy is legendary - I think this is partly due to their %98.8 employee retention rate, litigious tendencies, and hellish NDA's. Either way, even "reliable" people get them wrong more often than not it seems.
 
Last edited:

StereoVsn

Member
The reports here do NOT line up with the tech available and presumably being used in the Switch 2. Under the best case scenario, a Switch 2 could possibly have ~2 tflops at a 15-20W TDP.

I know that tflops aren’t going to give us the whole picture, but that’s still only 20% of the compute of a PS5. People expecting anywhere close to similar power to a PS5 or XSX are dreaming.

That being said, I have no doubt that a very modified version of even the Matrix demo could run on a modern mobile chipset. However, I’d be interested in finding out what the TDP is, because if Nintendo cranked up an Orin SoC to 50W+ , it could absolutely get similar perceived results to a PS5 with use of DLSS. But since there’s no way a Switch 2 would have a TDP higher than 15 or 20W, I don’t see why they would do that.

Even with DLSS and significant tweaks and optimizations, I have a very hard time believing the Matrix demo could run decently on an Orin SoC at 20W. It’d be similar to running it on an overclocked Steam Deck. But who knows, maybe Nintendo hired Panic Button to port the Matrix demo lol.

In any case, y’all need to get your expectations in check. There is no physical possibility that a Switch 2 could perform at the level of a PS5 or XSX.
Technically in Docked mode Switch 2 could get say 45-50w depending on the cooling setup. Will Nintendo do that? Probably not.
 
If that thing runs the Matrix demo (runs it well anyway), we're not looking at a lightweight CPU for mobile devices.
I going to laugh my ass off if AMD ends up producing hardware for every console in the market.

It seems to me that Nintendo wanted news of their next system to be released to combat Sony's new handheld accessory announcements last week. Nintendo will need to give us more information on whether the next system is fully backward compatible with the Switch and is also a continuation of the hybrid gaming platform if they want to divert sales away from the Playstation Portal, which has a release date this November. I can see Nintendo leaking a lot more info on their new system before that date. If these rumored specs are true, I'll gladly pay $500+ for the next Nintendo system.
 
Last edited:

Katatonic

Member
No proper D-Pad, attachable joycons in portrait mode (without the need for FlipGrip), and significantly bigger screen, no buy.
 

zeldaring

Banned
zelda1bu1l.gif

It's finally going to be real & it's going to be glorious
I Remember this. Nintendo fans constantly sayings wiiu was more powerful then 360 when most ports ran worse. then it was finally confirmed that it actually had less gflops then 360. although this time time DlSS technology could be the miracle nintendo needed to finally be able to get current gen ports, still wait and see.
 
Last edited:

Woopah

Member
It seems to me that Nintendo wanted news of their next system to be released to combat Sony's new handheld accessory announcements last week. Nintendo will need to give us more information on whether the next system is fully backward compatible with the Switch and is also a continuation of the hybrid gaming platform if they want to divert sales away from the Playstation Portal, which has a release date this November. I can see Nintendo leaking a lot more info on their new system before that date. If these rumored specs are true, I'll gladly pay $500+ for the next Nintendo system.
Nintendo is not going to purposefully leak things about their own system. They're not going to react to the Portal, they'll just have a proper announcement next year.
 

Ogbert

Member
Question - and please don’t “guess answer” if you’re not sure.

Why would Nintendo hold a behind-the-scenes developer “preview” of a system that presumably comes out, at max, 1 year from now?

If it truly does come out in 1 year, developers would’ve needed access to a development kit (or at least the specs) for several years already. Otherwise how would games be available to launch with the system in late 2024 if Nintendo is just now “previewing” capabilities? The end of the article says development kits are landing in the hands of key partners… just now? A year from launch?

We also already know this wasn’t shown to journalists - only developers. Unless I’m missing something, this doesn’t line up.

Also keep in mind everyone was wrong about Switch 1, pretty much about everything. Euro gamer also perpetuated the rumors about a Switch Pro for years.
As others have suggested, it would have been for smaller developers who aren’t their principal partners. Anyone developing for it would have had the kits for maybe 12/18 months. They will all be under NDA but I expect it’s all common knowledge across the industry.

The article saying that dev kits are just going out was bullshit.
 
Last edited:

Gambit2483

Member
Only if they replace the crappy joycons with real controllers.
Huh? Pro controllers do exist, no?

Or do you mean change the handheld design/form? Joycon design is probably due to their detachable nature and to have better ergonomics and form as one solid device. Besides you can always buy attachable grips if that's what you want..🤷‍♂️
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
It seems to me that Nintendo wanted news of their next system to be released to combat Sony's new handheld accessory announcements last week. Nintendo will need to give us more information on whether the next system is fully backward compatible with the Switch and is also a continuation of the hybrid gaming platform if they want to divert sales away from the Playstation Portal, which has a release date this November. I can see Nintendo leaking a lot more info on their new system before that date. If these rumored specs are true, I'll gladly pay $500+ for the next Nintendo system.
Sony’s fisher price Chinese tablet :messenger_tears_of_joy:
 

E-Cat

Member
Current consoles are already struggling, so much so Sony wants a PS5 pro already lol and here we are saying switch 2 is comparable to ps5 lol

I know dlss can pull some miracles on the PC space, but I just don't buy it.

But I would LOVE to be wrong. Please let me be wrong
No one could do on Switch what Nintendo did with Zelda, imagine what they can do with a shitty PS5.
 
720p or 480p matrix demo is possible with dlss 3. I think Nintendo chose the right partner for soc that is nvidia. Can't wait for reveal.

100% agree with you about NVIDIA and DLSS because FSR1 and FSR2 have been far from impressive on the PS5 and Xbox Series X. NVIDIA also have the edge when it comes to ray-tracing too because they had an 18 month head start over AMD.
 

THE DUCK

voted poster of the decade by bots
Huh? Pro controllers do exist, no?

Or do you mean change the handheld design/form? Joycon design is probably due to their detachable nature and to have better ergonomics and form as one solid device. Besides you can always buy attachable grips if that's what you want..🤷‍♂️

Yes and I have them, but we can do better on the included ones. No stick drift and ergonomic improvements should be expected. And I do like the detachable nature. I just don't feel like if I spend $500 canadian for the new machine I should really have to replace the joysticks day 1.
 

Holammer

Member
I don't get why people are so assblasted that Nintendo has a comparable level of power to its competition again, as if the SNES/N64/GameCube never existed.

With the diminishing returns on graphics in recent years, it was inevitable that they'd finally catch up in the price range they're comfortable with. If the new Switch is as/more powerful than PS4, it can absolutely run Unreal 5 caliber games @ 720p and they'll look incredible on an 8" screen.

130+ million Switch owners, and now Nintendo will be receiving every major third party release. This could be the biggest seismic shift we've seen in the market in 30 years.
Heck, add the NES to that, you need to compare it to the competition when it released in 1983. It trounced the existing micros such as C64, MSX and Spectrum, Sega's SG-1000 and a bunch of horribly outdated 70's era consoles. It was flawed, but it was still the most powerful console until the Master System released in 1985.

As for it being a mobile device? I think not. It's going to have to be able to offer acceptable resolution on a 4k screen. DLSS is great, but it's not a free lunch in terms of processing power required. I would design the handheld portion as an optional device like Sony's upcoming Portal controller. So the main console unit can have adequate power and cooling.

It seems to me that Nintendo wanted news of their next system to be released to combat Sony's new handheld accessory announcements last week. Nintendo will need to give us more information on whether the next system is fully backward compatible with the Switch and is also a continuation of the hybrid gaming platform if they want to divert sales away from the Playstation Portal, which has a release date this November. I can see Nintendo leaking a lot more info on their new system before that date. If these rumored specs are true, I'll gladly pay $500+ for the next Nintendo system.
Nah, I don't think Nintendo intends to hard counter the Portal with a new hardware announcement. If anything, Sony used unveiled the Portal to steal Nintendo's Next Gen glory, if my hunch is correct. Perhaps we'll see in a few months, I want to see Mario Kart 9.
 

JimboJones

Member
It seems to me that Nintendo wanted news of their next system to be released to combat Sony's new handheld accessory announcements last week. Nintendo will need to give us more information on whether the next system is fully backward compatible with the Switch and is also a continuation of the hybrid gaming platform if they want to divert sales away from the Playstation Portal, which has a release date this November. I can see Nintendo leaking a lot more info on their new system before that date. If these rumored specs are true, I'll gladly pay $500+ for the next Nintendo system.

Guaranteed Playstation Portal will not have factored into Nintendo's planning, that thing is a joke and will be lucky if anyone is talking about it in a year. It's equivalent to the PS One screen attachment.
 

Dacvak

No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
Y’all keep saying “Portal” and I keep thinking you’re talking about the Pimax Portal, which is exactly Switch form factor, but the joycons are magnetic, and it has a snapdragon 865.

I have one. They’re really nice.

cFkQxzK.jpg
 

Kataploom

Gold Member
Graphics technology these days is highly scalable, we're far from the T&L days where bragging about polygon count on a custom made CPU meant something, so I don't think it's impossible.

There was another rumor about Switch 2 being "2 SKUs" (maybe that's where "2" comes from... *ba dum tsss*), so maybe this time they're emulating Xbox Series strategy but with portable and stationary. I wish for that.

DLSS is totally believable. In fact I believe DLSS will be the star of this new Nintendo Switch. But Ray Tracing?
'Its not targeting PS5', but using Ray Tracing? Are people here forgeting that Nintendo Switch use an ARM cpu?
Guys, please. This is not the Nintendo way. RT will bring nothing to the first party table. DLSS is the only thing I can understand because consumers normally use 4K TVs when dock their Nintendo Switch.
Believe in what you want. I don't believe RT stuff taking into account the current state of Ray Tracing and what you need, from the PC pespective, to use a Ray Tracing.

Ray Tracing is very very taxing, I don't believe at all Nintendo will target Ray Tracing, is not even worthy building a hydric console with RT capable hardware just for third party to use. Nintendo exclusive games wouldn't use RT because art direction.

Again, make sense they pursuit DLSS to tackle the lower resolution. Nothing more.
It can help them boost games production pipeline, maybe Zelda and Metroid won't use it because they rather use the power to put more and better effects but Mario Party, Mario Golf and some other smaller titles can be developed quicker with Nanite and Lumen or RT like solutions without too much performance penalty, considering those games tend to be 1080p or 900p running at 60 fps locked on Switch.

Not a chance a 3tf mobile device and keep up with a 12tf home machine.
Yall need to relax
All it has to do is have good enough CPU and RAM, graphics can be downscaled easily as they do on current Switch and XSS, problem with these consoles for which downscaling isn't linear is memory bandwidth, but if Nintendo solves that I think they can get current gen ports pretty easily without much effort.
 

SRTtoZ

Member
Oh boy. There's gonna be a lot of disappointment just like the Switch "Pro" turned into the Switch OLED. People expecting PS5/Series X visuals on a small ass handheld are crazy. We will be lucky if they support proper 1080p.
 
The NVIDIA Tegra T239 which is the most likely SoC for the Switch 2 could use these bigger A78C arm cores. From this diagram it looks like it will be a huge improvement in IPC vs what's currently in the Switch.

A78C-blog-post-image5.JPG


Original leak from this reddit thread:

 
Last edited:

EruditeHobo

Member
Honestly I'll believe this when I see it... there's no reason to think it makes sense for Nintendo to release hardware competing with the likes of Sony or MS, it's been like 17 years since they even tried.

The biggest issue for me is not power, but whether or not Switch 2 will be backwards compatible -- if not, most likely no buy from me. I've enjoyed my Switch, but on principle I won't support that kind of extremely user-unfriendly practice.

But Wii U was BC with Wii, right? So I can hold out hope for Switch 2.

Will be about time for me to jump into TOTK sometime next year, so if there's BC, better resolution on handheld mode, and TOTK performance update release... I'll be there.
 
Top Bottom