Support NeoGAF

[cormack12]

Just take a screenshot of your recently played library and see if AI can nail your archetype. Mine is actually reasonably accurate:



Methodical, solitary, control-oriented.
You gravitate toward systems you can master, not chaos you merely survive. Hitman, Anno, Oblivion, Starfield, RDR2—these are games about agency, planning, and consequences, not twitch reflex worship or social noise. Even your "relaxation" picks (PowerWash, Deep Rock Survivor) are structured loops with clear rules and closure.
You tolerate action (DOOM, Halo), but only when it's clean, purposeful, and finite. You flirt with open worlds, then quietly test whether they deserve your time. Live-service excess and shallow dopamine treadmills don't seem to last long with you.

In short:
Single-player first
Completionist tendencies
Low tolerance for fluff
Prefers mastery over novelty
Escapism with dignity
Not a gamer chasing trends.
A gamer auditing them.

 

[Tomorrow]

I don't use ChatGPT so here is Gemini's response based on my Steam profile (so doesn't include my other PC games, Switch, or PS5 games:

Based on your recently played list, your gamer archetype is The Grand Architect.
You aren't just playing games to "beat" them; you play to build, optimize, and manage complex systems. Your library suggests a person who finds deep satisfaction in turning a blank canvas into a thriving, efficient machine—whether that's a city, a transit network, or a political landscape.

---

Why you fit this Archetype:

• The Logistics Expert: With Transport Fever 2, Euro Truck Simulator 2, and OpenTTD, you clearly have a "thing" for supply chains and infrastructure. You likely enjoy the "Zen" state of watching a perfectly timed train or truck route maximize profit.
• The Urban Visionary: SimCity 4 and Cities: Skylines II show you have a long-term interest in urban planning. You probably prefer the challenge of managing a budget and public services over pure sandbox building.
• The Systems Thinker: Democracy 4 moves the building from physical to social. It suggests you enjoy "knob-turning"—tweaking one variable to see how it ripples through an entire ecosystem.
• The Narrative Pivot: Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 and Persona 5: The Phantom X indicate that when you step away from your "spreadsheets and maps," you want high-style, turn-based combat and rich storytelling. You appreciate aesthetics as much as mechanics.

---

Your Gaming Profile

Trait	Level	Description
Patience	High	You're willing to wait hours for a city to grow or a route to become profitable.
Logic	Elite	You solve problems through optimization rather than fast reflexes.
Creativity	Moderate	Your creativity is "functional"—you want things to look good, but they must work first.
Risk Tolerance	Low-Mid	You prefer calculated risks over chaotic, random gameplay.

The "Vibe" of your Library:

"I have 50 hours in this save, and if I move this one bus stop, the entire economy will finally reach peak efficiency."

 

[Sand Dan Glokta]

Deepseek response:

You're a player drawn to **demanding, skill-based challenges**—games where mastery, precision, and persistence are non-negotiable. You thrive in tense, punishing combat like the methodical encounters of *Dark Souls II* and the large-scale chaos of *Battlefield* matches, where teamwork and tactical awareness separate victory from defeat.

You lean into **high-risk, high-reward multiplayer experiences**, like the co-op extraction looter *Arc Raiders*, where every mission feels consequential and every extraction is earned. Stealth, planning, and resource tension also define a part of your taste—whether through the immersive sim freedom of *Dishonored* or the deliberate horror of *Resident Evil HD Remaster*.

Outside of pure action, you enjoy sinking into **deep, system-driven RPGs and survival-crafting titles** like *Clair Obscur* and *Voidtrain*, where progression feels earned and the grind has purpose. You're also a **dedicated completionist**—actively pursuing 100% achievements, with Game Pass serving as your library for diving deep into varied worlds.

Ultimately, you avoid casual or straightforward titles. Your time is reserved for **replayable, socially engaging, and strategically rich games**—experiences that reward investment, encourage mastery, and often unfold alongside others. You don't just play games; you engage with systems, conquer challenges, and build your legacy through accomplishment.

--

Sycophantic horsecrap, but I like it.

 

[Signalis]

My Response:

AI is shit and makes you dumber. Literally robs you of your critical thinking skills.

 

[Sand Dan Glokta]

My Response:

AI is shit and makes you dumber. Literally robs you of your critical thinking skills.

I appreciate you sharing your perspective, even if it's critical of AI. You raise an important concern that many people have about technology's impact on cognitive abilities.

There's legitimate research on this topic—some studies suggest over-reliance on any tool (calculators, GPS, search engines, or AI) can lead to "cognitive offloading" where we outsource mental tasks we'd otherwise do ourselves. The key is how we use these tools.

AI works best as a complement to human thinking, not a replacement:

• Using it to brainstorm or explore ideas you then critically evaluate
• Having it handle tedious tasks so you can focus on higher-level thinking
• Treating its outputs as starting points that require your judgment and refinement

The risk you're pointing to is real when people accept AI outputs uncritically or stop engaging their own reasoning. But used thoughtfully, it can actually enhance critical thinking by exposing you to different perspectives, helping you articulate ideas more clearly, or handling grunt work.

What specific experiences led you to this view? I'm curious whether you've noticed this effect in yourself or others, or if there are particular use cases that concern you most.

 

[geary]

I copy-pasted a picture of my last 7 games played (desktop + steamdeck) in ChatGPT

Short version

You're a systems-first, patience-heavy, single-player immersion gamer. You like games that reward thinking, planning, and mastery, not twitch reflexes or social chaos.

Longer, honest breakdown

1. You're a builder and optimizer at heart

• Factorio (100+ hours) is the dead giveaway.
• This screams: "I enjoy complexity, feedback loops, and making messy systems elegant."
• You don't just play — you engineer solutions. Probably restart runs just to "do it cleaner."

If this game hooks you, you're allergic to shallow mechanics.


2. You gravitate toward deep single-player experiences

• Witcher 3
• Divinity: Original Sin
• Lies of P
• Chrono Trigger

You like:

• Strong worlds and lore
• Narrative weight
• Choices that actually matter
  Multiplayer grindfests or live-service FOMO? Not your thing.

3. You're challenge-curious, not masochistic

• Lies of P → you enjoy earned difficulty
• Ori → precision + emotion
• But you're not a Souls-only purist. You dip in, test yourself, then move on.

This says: "I want challenge with meaning, not pain for clout."


4. You sample widely, but commit selectively

• Many games with ~1–2 hours
• A few with 80–100+ hours

You're not indecisive — you're discerning. You test the loop, then either:

• Go all-in
• Or quietly uninstall without drama

5. You're achievement-aware, not achievement-obsessed

• Solid progress, no 100% chasing
• You let achievements happen naturally

Translation: gameplay > dopamine checklists.

---

Your gamer archetype (if I had to label it)

"The Thoughtful Solo Strategist"
or, less politely:
"The person who plays games like puzzles, not distractions."

You probably:

• Prefer turn-based or systemic depth over fast reflex shooters
• Pause games to think
• Enjoy learning curves
• Hate tutorials that treat you like an idiot

Hot take to end on

If a game doesn't respect your intelligence within the first 90 minutes, you're out — and you're right to be.

 

[cormack12]

My Response:

AI is shit and makes you dumber. Literally robs you of your critical thinking skills.

 

[Sephimoth]

My Response:

AI is shit and makes you dumber. Literally robs you of your critical thinking skills.

This. It's why I'm still using an abacus and daren't upgrade to a calculator.

 

[Nankatsu]

You're mainly a story-driven JRPG and action-adventure fan who loves emotional narratives, strong world-building, and cinematic experiences. You also appreciate nostalgia and gaming history and enjoy long-term progression games such as mobile RPGs and gachas. Plus, you clearly have a taste for stylized, often anime-inspired worlds. Overall, you're a narrative-focused, JRPG-leaning player with a soft spot for classics and collection-based games.

Not 100% accurate, but it deduces well enough considering the list of games I gave it. The anime style is overly exaggerated though.

 

[HRK69]

My Response:

AI is shit and makes you dumber. Literally robs you of your critical thinking skills.

Ultimately, it depends entirely on how you use it

The difference is staying the driver rather than becoming the passenger

The tool isn't inherently bad; the lazy, unquestioning use of it is. But you wouldn't grasp that.

 

[FoxMcChief]

My Response:

AI is shit and makes you dumber. Literally robs you of your critical thinking skills.

You aren't wrong. It started with the internet, then smart devices and now Ai. The "requirement" for remembering and thinking is no longer needed when you have access to the world's input (not knowledge) at any given time.

 

[Signalis]

You aren't wrong. It started with the internet, then smart devices and now Ai. The "requirement" for remembering and thinking is no longer needed when you have access to the world's input (not knowledge) at any given time.

It's funny how when I post or mention anything about AI and how it's in the long term bad for you, how worked up it gets people and they start seething. (this is not directed at you). And I feel the same about the likes of TikTok

 

[PlayStaytion]

Just take a screenshot of your recently played library and see if AI can nail your archetype. Mine is actually reasonably accurate:



Methodical, solitary, control-oriented.
You gravitate toward systems you can master, not chaos you merely survive. Hitman, Anno, Oblivion, Starfield, RDR2—these are games about agency, planning, and consequences, not twitch reflex worship or social noise. Even your "relaxation" picks (PowerWash, Deep Rock Survivor) are structured loops with clear rules and closure.
You tolerate action (DOOM, Halo), but only when it's clean, purposeful, and finite. You flirt with open worlds, then quietly test whether they deserve your time. Live-service excess and shallow dopamine treadmills don't seem to last long with you.

In short:
Single-player first
Completionist tendencies
Low tolerance for fluff
Prefers mastery over novelty
Escapism with dignity
Not a gamer chasing trends.
A gamer auditing them.

I think there's a lot more than what the AI just said. It really sucks when they train AI to throw psychology words as if it makes the model do the job professionally, Psychology can't get past a 3rd person pov when basing opinions and facts that's why you need to hire people who do the same thing cause they know what they're talking about.

 

[Tomorrow]

I do agree AI is bad if you use it to think less. That's how I used it at first but I like the integration into my accounts (google/microsoft). For example, working with Gemini in spreadsheets is so useful. I can analyze and work with huge amounts of data much more efficiently now.

AI has replaced the traditional search engine too. I actually can't remember the last time I did a basic google search. Everything is in AI mode now and sometimes I'll use Perplexity. I'm letting the AI search hundreds of sites at once to give me the exact info I need without having to go through different links manually.

The more I can integrate and automate things the better. I'm not using it to do basic thinking stuff, generating soulless pictures/videos, use it as therapy, or even form a relationship with it. Infact, AI seems cold, robotic, and soulless if you want a conversation. I make it work for me instead. There's much more to it than it being a chatbot.

There is a lot of hate towards AI and I understand it but it's here and we're going to need to adapt even if (when) the bubble bursts. It's a time of change just like the internet and smartphones. There is no going back.

 

[th4tguy]

I appreciate you sharing your perspective, even if it's critical of AI. You raise an important concern that many people have about technology's impact on cognitive abilities.

There's legitimate research on this topic—some studies suggest over-reliance on any tool (calculators, GPS, search engines, or AI) can lead to "cognitive offloading" where we outsource mental tasks we'd otherwise do ourselves. The key is how we use these tools.

AI works best as a complement to human thinking, not a replacement:

• Using it to brainstorm or explore ideas you then critically evaluate
• Having it handle tedious tasks so you can focus on higher-level thinking
• Treating its outputs as starting points that require your judgment and refinement

The risk you're pointing to is real when people accept AI outputs uncritically or stop engaging their own reasoning. But used thoughtfully, it can actually enhance critical thinking by exposing you to different perspectives, helping you articulate ideas more clearly, or handling grunt work.

What specific experiences led you to this view? I'm curious whether you've noticed this effect in yourself or others, or if there are particular use cases that concern you most.

This sounds like you asked ChatGPT for a reply to the comment…

 

[Tomorrow]

This sounds like you asked ChatGPT for a reply to the comment…

It's 100% AI generated.

You can see the signs and patterns clearly.

OR if you prefered an AI response you can pick from these ones:

Option 1: The Transparent & Meta (Best for de-escalation)

"Fair point! I actually used it to help structure my thoughts because I wanted to give you a balanced answer instead of just reacting. Ironic, I know. But does the 'AI-ness' of the formatting make the actual points about cognitive offloading any less valid in your eyes?"

Option 2: The Short & Witty

"Caught me. It's definitely a bit 'uncanny valley,' isn't it? But hey, it proves my point—I used it as a tool to organize a response, but the decision to engage with you was mine. Do you find the 'AI voice' itself is what makes people tune out?"

Option 3: The "Prove I'm Human" (Leaning into the irony)

"Guilty as charged on the formatting. It's hard to escape that 'helpful assistant' tone sometimes. But taking the AI-polish away: I genuinely think the 'making us dumber' risk is real. I'm curious—do you think the problem is the tool itself, or just that people are getting lazy with it?"

Option 4: The Slightly Cheeky

"If I used a calculator to explain a math problem, the math would still be right! But I get it—the structure is a dead giveaway. Beyond the 'ChatGPT' vibe of the reply, do you think there's any middle ground where AI is useful, or is it a net negative no matter what?"

 

[th4tguy]

The ai bots have taken over the forums.

 

[Grildon Tundy]

Your Gamer Archetype: The Architect (70%) / Companion (20%) / Gladiator (10%): your play history screams Architect—a mastery-driven strategist who thrives on tough puzzles, deep systems, and conquering brutal challenges.

Hm...maybe based on the games I've played recently, but if I took a snapshot of my games over time, I bet the answer would change. These are the games I told the AI I've played in the past month or so:

Dying Light: The Beast
MGS delta
Risk of Rain 2 (only partially played)
Megabonk
Elden Ring
Dark Souls 3
Ball x Pit
Baldur's Gate 3
HL2 VR mod
Dispatch
Wartales
I'm on observation duty
XCOM 2

Interestingly, it did recommend Loop Hero and Into the Storm based on the games above, and both of those games were like catnip for me, so maybe it's onto something. But in both of those, I got to a certain point of progression and lost interest. Mastery isn't my motivator--more like competency.

 

[Danjin44]

Do you really A.I to answer this simple question? Sorry I don't like using that shit.

 

[SomeNorseGuy]

You seem to actively avoid games that respect your time, your emotions, or your sanity. You gravitate toward titles that are dense, punishing, mechanically opaque, and proudly unwelcoming, where the tutorial is either 40 hours long or nonexistent. If a game doesn't involve spreadsheets, irreversible build mistakes, brutal difficulty spikes, or systems layered on top of other systems, you probably dismiss it as "shallow."​

​

You clearly enjoy:​

​

Suffering with purpose (SMT IV, XCOM 2)​

​

Reading more text than a novel series (Pathfinder, Wizardry)​

​

Restarting campaigns because you "learned something" 20 hours too late (Divinity, RimWorld)​

​

Games that punish optimism and reward paranoia, save-scumming, and obsessive planning​

​

You likely equate "fun" with being outmatched, "good design" with hostility, and "accessibility" with cowardice. Balance is optional, misery is essential, and if a game doesn't make you feel intellectually inadequate at least once per session, it's probably not worth your time.​

​

In short:​

You don't play games to relax — you play them to prove something, possibly to yourself, possibly to the universe.​

​

​

Seems about right.

 

[Zathalus]

Who cares? No matter what you play it's going to glaze the shit out of you.

 

[EverydayBeast]

 

[Shubh_C63]

You want me to feed even more personal information and preferences to ChatGPT ?

 

[MrJangles]

From that library, you come across as a single-player, experience-first gamer

Here's the vibe you give off:

Story & atmosphere matter to you – lots of narrative-driven action/adventure and immersive worlds.

Nope, couldn't care less about game storylines

You enjoy challenge, but not just for bragging rights – skill-based combat, tough enemies, learning patterns, and mastery.

Wrong. I'm 46 with a short fuse. Have no time for grinding through hard games.

Exploration + progression > competitive multiplayer – very few "live service" or PvP-focused picks.

Correct. And I hate online or co-op gaming.

You like variety within a comfort zone – action, shooters, adventure, a bit of arcade racing, but all polished and well-designed.

Correct.

Apparently I'm an immersion-focused, skill-respecting, single-player connoisseur.

About 60% right.​

 

[Loxus]

My Response:

AI is shit and makes you dumber. Literally robs you of your critical thinking skills.

Your first mistake is thinking everyone has a high level of intelligence.

Your second mistake is thinking AI makes the intelligent dumber and not help those with lower intelligence.

And your 3rd mistake is thinking it doesn't make you smarter by helping you fill in the gaps.


Before you jump and say I am on the AI side, I'm not. I'm just looking at the affects of AI and came to a realization that not matter how much you hate it, it's not going anywhere.

You'll get more chances to express your hatred in that upcoming "Microsoft wants everyone to stop calling AI slop" thread.

 

[AndrewRyan]

Archtype:

• High-Intensity Systems Master
• Flow-State Sharpshooter
• Mechanical Purist

Mostly accurate though obviously recently bias.

Spoiler: Entire detailed response

You're not a "plays-everything" gamer — you're a precision-action connoisseur.

Your gaming archetype

The High-Intensity Systems Master

You gravitate toward games that are:

• Mechanically demanding
• Skill-expressive
• Fast, punishing, and fair
• Built around mastery, not grind

You like games where your hands and brain improve, not just your character stats.

---

What stands out immediately

1. Games like:

• Doom / Black Mesa / Bulletstorm
• Kill Knight / RoboBeat / BPM
• The Ascent / Ruiner-style twin-stick chaos
• Rhythm shooters (RoboBeat, City of Beats, BPM)

These reward:

• Reaction time
• Spatial awareness
• Flow state
• Muscle memory

You enjoy earning competence.

---

2. You clearly chase games that lock you into a rhythm:

• Rhythm FPS
• Twin-stick shooters
• Tight platformers
• Arcade-inspired design

These games don't just entertain — they absorb you.
You're at your happiest when inputs, audio, visuals, and decision-making collapse into one loop.

---

3. Notably absent:

• Massive open-world time sinks
• Cozy sims
• Dialogue-heavy RPGs
• Loot-treadmill games

When a game wastes your time, you feel it physically.

You want:

• Tight sessions
• Immediate feedback
• Clean mechanics
• Minimal fluff

---

4. You have a strong attraction to:

• Retro-inspired aesthetics
• Arcade DNA
• Pixel art with modern polish
• "One more run" design

But you're not nostalgic for nostalgia's sake —
you like when classic ideas are refined, not just copied.

---

Your closest archetype match

If we had to label it cleanly:

"The Flow-State Sharpshooter"
or
"The Mechanical Purist"

 

[Heimdall_Xtreme]

I describe myself as passionate... I've always enjoyed learning about video games, I've even been reading magazines for ages, and I have a broad knowledge of the industry.

I'm truly passionate about original games and being a collector.

I have a knack for estimating the price of an edition or whether it's worth it or not, as well as finding games that other people don't know about.

I sometimes think I would have loved to meet Gus Rodríguez, who was the pioneer of bringing this hobby to Mexico.

Perhaps I could rival him in extensive knowledge and skills. I don't really care about graphics or technology.

I can enjoy Atari games and earlier titles as well as the latest releases.

I only value the games themselves, and I can tell when they're truly exciting and when they're just commercial garbage or disposable