AGRacing
Member
If we were to do a postmortem on life of the Xbox Series S console would we really come away from that exercise recommending to Sony to take a 250 watt machine and tie its fate to one that pulls like.. 45 watts?
The RAM spec is 80% of the full console according the the leak.
The Series S did only have 62% of the RAM of its big brother.
But I think the GPU power itself would be a wider divide just considering the power draw alone.
Would Sony do better by calling the portable machine "PSP 2" and removing the necessity for every PS6 game to work day and date with the machine? I can't see that being a great idea either… it would probably get "Vita'd" even though it would be an easy platform to port to for most non-showcase tier games.
I guess the existence of a PS6 handheld which wouldn't be able to run anything that a PS5 Pro isn't powerful enough to run really muddies the water in terms of a value proposition to upgrade.
Are they screwing up the launch of a console generation by the handheld even existing?
The RAM spec is 80% of the full console according the the leak.
The Series S did only have 62% of the RAM of its big brother.
But I think the GPU power itself would be a wider divide just considering the power draw alone.
Would Sony do better by calling the portable machine "PSP 2" and removing the necessity for every PS6 game to work day and date with the machine? I can't see that being a great idea either… it would probably get "Vita'd" even though it would be an easy platform to port to for most non-showcase tier games.
I guess the existence of a PS6 handheld which wouldn't be able to run anything that a PS5 Pro isn't powerful enough to run really muddies the water in terms of a value proposition to upgrade.
Are they screwing up the launch of a console generation by the handheld even existing?