I always thought it meant 'positive'Why is there always a "+" on the end?
Is that just how they indicate that there's always going to be more "identities" in the future (as soon as they discover a name for them)?
What about the negatives though? That's so exclusionary.I always thought it meant 'positive'
Yes. In other words they could call them "+people" and leave it at that but the ideology is all performative and fake so you get this shit instead.Why is there always a "+" on the end?
Is that just how they indicate that there's always going to be more "identities" in the future (as soon as they discover a name for them)?
Why is there always a "+" on the end?
Is that just how they indicate that there's always going to be more "identities" in the future (as soon as they discover a name for them)?
Exactly.Oppression must go on. There's always another one.
Max Victimhood.Why is it always a "genocide ?" Are people hunting and killing these folks? Using that word is a complete insult to groups who actually went though such a horror.
NDP MP Leah Gazan is standing by her use of the initialism MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ and denouncing those who are mocking her online for using the term.
A clip of the Winnipeg Centre MP saying "the ongoing genocide of MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+" during a news conference in Ottawa went viral this week and sparked backlash, including insults from Elon Musk and U.S. Republican Sen. Ted Cruz.
"Bigots are bigots," Gazan told CBC News in response.
"I certainly am really happy that bigots are offended by my positions around equality. What I am concerned about and certainly motivated — continue to be motivated about — is ending systemic racism in this country."