llien
Member
I have a question for you, while we're posing them.
At what threshold is violence against Nazism acceptable in your eyes?
- Private assemblies, political incorporation
- Formalized extremist creeds
- Public assemblies
- Formal security personnel
- Public speeches and lectures
- Brawling with political opponents
- Riot-as-revolution
- Vandalism
- Dodgy pardons
- Growing membership and political participation
- Discharging firearms against political opponents
- Martyrdom
- Political gains
- Political mainstream
- Anti-minority vandalism
- Political alliances, political coalition
- Government inaction
- Executive office
- Arson, false-flagging
- Partial political party bans
- Emergency, unlimited executive powers
- Full political party bans
- Political purges
- Permanent, unlimited executive powers
- Concentration camps for political enemies
- Laws discriminating against minorities
- Desertion of international causes and organizations
- Violation of international treaties
- Proxy wars
- Annexation of border regions
- Annexation of the rest
- Pogroms of minorities
- Invades a neighbor
- Segregates minorities into ghettoes
- Moves minorities into death camps
You weren't talking to me, but thanks for coming up with this list, it actually made me re-think my position, as I'm also in "violence is not an answer' camp.
In short, violence is the right answer to violence. A number of items are/should be illegal so fined/prosecuted.
So, as a response to harassment, yes. (the way I read screenshots in the first post, there should have been a whole group of them)
America.
In 2011 a 30-year-old Canadian tourist was arrested after he was photographed giving the Nazi salute outside the Reichstag, the German parliament building, in Berlin. He got off with a fine and several hours in police custody.
He could have faced prison sentence up to 6 month. It's even harsher in some other countries, up to 5 years. Although it is never as harsh in practice, typically they get away with fines.
Here's an editorial from the New York Times this week shining a light on the genocidal racists some of you are defending.
The Nazis' First Victims Were the Disabled
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/13/opinion/nazis-holocaust-disabled.html
If your finger is hovering over that Reply button to defend fucking Nazis, first spend at least one hour watching a WW2 documentary or reading a book before replying. When you have absorbed that information and that pesky thing called "perspective" keeps nagging at your specious arguments, listen to it.
Interesting that they didn't mention that US has forcefully sterilized between 30 to 40 thousand (mostly in California). In Europe, as far as I remember at least Sweden did the same. (likely not only them)
Please don't read it as equating mentioned countries and Nazis, nobody went even remotely as far as Nazi Germany.