I think the OP needs to be edited. It seems like this was an issue with the servers being down while reviewers were playing vs some sort of alteration to review copies. The OP and title seems to allude to some sort of conspiracy which doesn't seem to be true.
That still doesn't change the fact that there are MTA in a 60 retail game.
Wow. I wonder if Best Buy would let me return the game since 90% of it doesn't fucking work.EA just got dethroned.
Seriously, that's so blatantly anti-consumer it's not even funny.
No, but I didn't try. The options weren't hidden though. Not working and "hidden" are two different things. AC Initiates wasn't working for most of my playthrough either.
Kotaku even took a screenshot for its review. That's how it appears in the game. You go to "Estore" and it's the first option there.
![]()
What would you like me to add? I added Totilo's clarification tweets already.
Let it.... BurnI think the OP needs to be edited. It seems like this was an issue with the servers being down while reviewers were playing vs some sort of alteration to review copies. The OP and title seems to allude to some sort of conspiracy which doesn't seem to be true.
There is no such thing as a "Review copy"... The journalists got a normal retail version of the game.
The store servers were simply down until very recently which is 100% common with pre-release reviews. There is nothing fishy going one, nothing special that didn''t happen already with 100s of other games in the past.
The only thing happening here is GAF being its normal self and jumping on a cheap occasion to bash Ubisoft.
isn't that the entire crux of this thread? that it is in the retail copies but not the review copies?
Game is live. We know it has these micro transactions. Part of this thread was spurred from a journalist not being able to distinguish if they were in fact real or not thus the "hidden" part. It was not completely clear.
The "hack item" specifically did not have any indication it was in fact tied to the pay currency that was in the game though. It has caused confusion and some thought it was a joke, I'd say that not being upfront entirely about what it was is incompetence at best and hiding at worst. "The DLC store is not operational for this item currently but in the future you will be able to buy enhancements to your game here" is a better message for a review copy than "SERVER ERROR 197560374-4739".
But then there's optional but questionable stuff like this, a real-money way to obtain the game's optional "hack" currency instead of using the in-game currency you earn by finishing most missions..
Without the prices, as it is suggested it appeared in the review build, that is still shady shit.
Put up microtransactions without the possibility of being laughed out of the room for asking players for $99 after a $60 purchase. Own up to that shit. Nah, it's a day one surprise via reviews, including the ridiculous prices.
Fuck Ubisoft.
Even if it's just this, it still means reviewers couldn't judge how expensive or extensive the microtransactions were, which is why they're barely mentioned. That aspect of the game was essentially ignored in reviews, but the game was designed with them in mind.
I'm really grateful Destiny(Activision) and Watch Dogs(Ubisoft) happened. They taught me a valuable lesson: never pre-order a game from either of these companies ever again, no matter how high the hype for the game is within the gaming community.
While I did enjoy Watch Dogs, despite being underwhelming after all of that immense advertising, I felt like I had wasted money and time with Destiny.
I was so hyped for AC, but I stayed my hand and i'm glad. Scumbag company, hiding microtransactions and shit.
If you want to make any impact, then skip Far Cry 4 as well.
Let it.... Burn
![]()
This x1000.
GAF is gonna jump on stuff, but this is pretty much common practice.
That's how all microtransactions work though. Most people pay nothing or only a little. That's not who they're targeting. They're after the whales who will pay big for these. So the game's system of cosmetic unlocks has been built around preying on a relatively small group of people....But oh wait, in that feed one of them does inform that it's not mandatory just that the most "desperate" folks may opt to unlock in this fashion. So I wonder if that makes it any better.
Why would co-op work but not the other features? Wouldn't they all be tied to the same server?
Has anyone seen CrossingEden today? I want to know how he's doing.
Has anyone seen CrossingEden today? I want to know how he's doing.
No, but I didn't try. The options weren't hidden though. Not working and "hidden" are two different things. AC Initiates wasn't working for most of my playthrough either.
Kotaku even took a screenshot for its review. That's how it appears in the game. You go to "Estore" and it's the first option there.
![]()
100 percent explicit? No, but seeing as we've been around this block a few times I guessed pretty quickly. When the in-game price is 25,000 and the Hack currency price is 800, I tend to go "hurm, microtransactions."
There needs to be a HUGE backlash/boycott on Ubisoft. Been doing this shit for YEARS and this latest round has been unbelievably horrendous.
probably busy playing assassin's creed: unity.Has anyone seen CrossingEden today? I want to know how he's doing.
the store servers were down until how recently? the review embargo ended 12 hours after the game released, and you'd think that they'd want the servers up when the game goes out... how, then, are reviewers seeing this now?