I like how CDPR don't give a fuck and just create an entirely new engine every game since W2
RED Engine is like FrostBite engine. They build foundation with first version and just keep building on it and improving it.
I like how CDPR don't give a fuck and just create an entirely new engine every game since W2
Geralt is done. They need to introduce something new. I'd like learn more about that world though.
I'd love to see other places and mysteries, meet other monsters and learn about more of the world's history.
I like Ciri, but I'm not sure she would be the right vehicle for that either. She's too powerful.
Cyberpunk is such an enigma. It looks amazing, but we know so little about it.
It's great to hear it's at an "advanced stage", but it sounds like it won't be out until at least fall/winter of next year. In some ways it's better to just not hear about it.
CDPR explains their "Cyberpunk" trademark: https://twitter.com/CDPROJEKTRED/status/850022540042960896
I love these guys.
After what I learned recently, it turns out we probably don't know anything.
Witcher 2 did the traps thing a lot more.I should have fleshed out my post a little bit. In the books, Geralt is often laying traps for monsters. While playing HZD I was thinking how the game really makes you feel like a hunter. Laying ambushes, using traps, funneling enemies - I think HZD really did this well and elements of it could work really well in a Witcher game too.
Also, I think W3 was much stronger in melee combat when fighting human enemies then HZD is, but HZD did a way better job fighting medium/large sized 'monsters' and flying creatures. Fighting a giant or a group of harpies in Witcher 3 was never as much an adrenaline ride as battling their equivalents in HZD.
But I/we are going offtopic a lot right now.
what do you mean???
They binned all the preproduction stuff and started fresh after Blood and Wine.
I'm on the contrary - I feel they're going the typical corpo way...
Just because someone has good PR, doesn't mean you can completely trust them. With a trademarked term like Cyberpunk, CDP opens their door to creating brands/products such as Cyberpunk board games, Cyberpunk: The Drama, Cyberpunk: Gwent, etc etc. So if you, or any other dev, tries to release a game say called "Cyberpunk Love Story", you might be in trouble.
What they are doing is smart, as they're slowly building a perception that Cyberpunk = CDP. In ten years time, that perception might hold true.
The fuck? That sounds bad. So many years wasted.They binned all the preproduction stuff and started fresh after Blood and Wine. There's also a new game director.
Oh God. So it means that 2018 is pretty much impossible.
Why would they do that? Also, do you mean literally everything? What about story? I remember reading somewhere that story was already finished...
You will be as much in trouble making a game named "Video game title: a cyberpunk adventure" as you would with "The Forest of Doom" in reference to the Doom trademark.
As in, you won't get in trouble at all.
RED Engine is like FrostBite engine. They build foundation with first version and just keep building on it and improving it.
They allegedly changed the engine for CP. Gien boskee's scoop, they probably built it anew.I've heard second hand that the Witcher 3's codebase was a spaghetti mess.
I'm afraid I can't say anything more.
They binned all the preproduction stuff and started fresh after Blood and Wine. There's also a new game director.
They allegedly changed the engine for CP. Gien boskee's scoop, they probably built it anew.
And yeah, it was obvious TW3 engine was stitched together, they changed the lighting, twice, and then also changed the renderer once the game was alredy released. Then they changed it again for Blood and Wine.
I've heard second hand that the Witcher 3's codebase was a spaghetti mess.
Man, this does not sound good.
I am sure it will be amazing when it comes out.
Man, this does not sound good.
On the contrary i think its a positive. Reminds me of old Blizzard.
They binned all the preproduction stuff and started fresh after Blood and Wine. There's also a new game director.
Old Blizzard? They just did this with Titan -> Overwatch, and now seemingly with Diablo 4, even including the director switch.On the contrary i think its a positive. Reminds me of old Blizzard.
If I may ask, would that be Mateusz Kanik and his role as director being replaced by another dev within CDPR?
In terms of changing the engine for CP 2077, would it still be built upon REDEngine?
I wish for more spaghetti mess in engines!
Super fast loading times, only 1 crash in 200 hours, no big visual errors or problems, good streaming tech, very decent performance for the visuals.
Starting reading up on cyberpunk. Sounds amazing. Any gameplay trailers or videos out there? Great genre for a game.
Nope. And we apparently we need to forget everything we know about in the first place. Except that it's cyberpunk.
Starting reading up on cyberpunk. Sounds amazing. Any gameplay trailers or videos out there? Great genre for a game.
They binned all the preproduction stuff and started fresh after Blood and Wine. There's also a new game director.
only one teaser, quite good actually.
Old Blizzard? They just did this with Titan -> Overwatch, and now seemingly with Diablo 4, even including the director switch.