The game looks way better in motion...neither of these two stills looks all that impressive.
Low, or even below that according to them.
Edit : According to DF here are the settings used on PS4 :
What exactly is worse on the XboxOne besides the resolution? Ive read a lot of hyperbole in this thread. Its amazing.
An even bigger difference is the amount of people on screen. Maybe a coincidence?
I'd hazard the guess, but I made no pretence to be a maven, that it may have a little something to do with the Jaguar cores.
Maybe, possibly, who knows.
Business as usual: exaggerating the difference between the two competing consoles and playing down the difference to pc version. People just love what they bought and aim for.
The game looks way better in motion...neither of these two stills looks all that impressive.
What exactly is worse on the XboxOne besides the resolution? Ive read a lot of hyperbole in this thread. Its amazing.
Business as usual: exaggerating the difference between the two competing consoles and playing down the difference to pc version. People just love what they bought and aim for.
As exemplified by yourself in this very post, I assume.
The Xbox One suffers for running at 900p so much...
![]()
![]()
You know the consoles are much closer to each other in terms of power yet the differences are there. The race with PC was non-existant, if you are looking for it then you are looking at the wrong place.Business as usual: exaggerating the difference between the two competing consoles and playing down the difference to pc version. People just love what they bought and aim for.
NOt only that... The author had the decency to actually point out that their budget PC (750Ti and low intel CPU) puts up comparable visuals to the PS4 version.Wow, never seen them rag on xbone so much.
Ah, its not a Leadbetter one, fair enough.
They aren't zoomed in, they are just cropped. It allows you to focus on a specific difference.I actually never understood these zoomed in shots anyway.
I think these PC gamers are really grasping at straws to try and validate their expensive hardware purchases. Aside from shadows, LOD, crowd density, textures, and framerate there really isn't a difference here.
I actually never understood these zoomed in shots anyway. Of course the lower resolution looks way worse if you zoom in on it like that but you will never play like that. So what's the point.
900p is slightly blurrier that's it. These shots are not reflecting real life gameplay. It just shows a higher resolution will still look sharper zoomed in than a lower resolution, but is that news to anyone anyways?
You know the consoles are much closer to each other in terms of power yet the differences are there. The race with PC was non-existant, if you are looking for it then you are looking at the wrong place.
I think these PC gamers are really grasping at straws to try and validate their expensive hardware purchases. Aside from shadows, LOD, crowd density, textures, and framerate there really isn't a difference here.
Aside from everything, there is no difference.
So you're telling me you need to zoom a screen to tell a difference between 1080p/900p ?
take a look at those screens then, tell me you can't see it :
PS4:
http://www.gamersyde.com/pop_images_the_witcher_3_wild_hunt-28298-6.html
XB1:
http://www.gamersyde.com/pop_images_the_witcher_3_wild_hunt-28308-4.html
PC has achievements, too.I will be building a PC in the fall. Hopefully I can snag a 980ti and build an awesome rig. Sometimes I wish there was a way get trophies on PC. The things I'm missing out on adds so much to the atmosphere of the Witcher 3.
NOt only that... The author had the decency to actually point out that their budget PC (750Ti and low intel CPU) puts up comparable visuals to the PS4 version.
Nobody says there is no difference because there measurably is. Doesn't mean he will see it, though.
Maybe I'm just more sensitive to these things having spent a good deal of time gaming on both PC and console alongside each other.
I know about steam achievements. I just hate to start over, you know? Small price to pay though.PC has achievements, too.
I know about steam achievements. I just hate to start over, you know? Small price to pay though.
Some people do have shameful agendas! XDUnfortunately this doesn't stop a lot of PS4-only folks from trying to make the gap between high-end and PS4 seem smaller, or PC-only people from forgetting about how above the so-called console wars they are supposed to be.
And as had been said thousand of upon thousands of times, YOU DON'T NEED TOP OF THE LINE PC HARDWARE TO GET BETTER QUALITY THAN CONSOLES.As strange as it sounds it's one of the reasons I'm not chasing the top of the line graphics that PCs can offer. I'm content with what the PS4 is capable because I "don't know any better". But I know if I start PC gaming I'll never be satisfied with lower graphics again and I'm just not in the financial position to try and stay on top of the latest pc hardware year after year.
There is no need of convincing, there are huge differences (except some corner cases). And there is a bigger difference between the PC and PS4 versions.Reminds me of PS4 gamers desperately convincing themselves that there is a huge difference between X1 and PS4 versions. The cycle continues.![]()
There is nothing subjective about the difference of power of the consoles and the PC.This thread and others tell a different story. And whether both consoles are close in terms of power or closer is also very subjective and there is no general consensus on this.
So you're telling me you need to zoom a screen to tell a difference between 1080p/900p ?
take a look at those screens then, tell me you can't see it :
PS4:
http://www.gamersyde.com/pop_images_the_witcher_3_wild_hunt-28298-6.html
XB1:
http://www.gamersyde.com/pop_images_the_witcher_3_wild_hunt-28308-4.html
I made these amendments to the config file.
Code:[Rendering] GrassDensity=3600 CascadeShadowFadeTreshold=0.5 CascadeShadowDistanceScale0=4 CascadeShadowDistanceScale1=4 CascadeShadowDistanceScale2=3 CascadeShadowDistanceScale3=3 MaxTerrainShadowAtlasCount=8 CascadeShadowQuality=4 [Rendering/SpeedTree] FoliageDistanceScale=2 GrassDistanceScale=4 FoliageShadowDistanceScale=108
Many of these are set to 1 on Ultra, so in some cases I've tripled or quadrupled. My performance hit is heavier for that reason. But lower values (still higher than ultra) aren't bad. Check the Geforce tweak guide for examples.
There is no need of convincing, there are huge differences (except some corner cases). And there is a bigger difference between the PC and PS4 versions.
There is nothing subjective about the difference of power of the consoles and the PC.
Ah gotcha.I know about steam achievements. I just hate to start over, you know? Small price to pay though.
... that scene won't look out of place or poor on PS4 especially when using a good display.
Yes, that I agree.True, but perception is certainly subjective. One person might look at those comparison screens and the differences are numerous and obvious while another looks at them and it basically looks the same.
I am perfectly happy playing on PS4. The game looks amazing.
I mentioned this before but sometimes reloading a save can fix the big framedrops on PS4. There's still hiccups here and there but one point during a mission with fire, a storm, and tons of NPCs the framerate was down to low 20s. Died and on the replay it was back up to 30. Hopefully they can make that the standard.Shit, never expected there to be that many dips on PS4. Hopefully this get's patched, doesn't make any sense given the noise surrounding PS4 (relatively) higher compute number count.
And no, not a single platform looks like shit, you must be either blind or ignorant to think that. This game is gorgeous. Period.
Say the person who seen fps is always higher on xbone when it's just because it uncapped. In any case fps it's quite stable on ps4 in the gameplay. There are some occasion where drops because swamp area and rain combined or other strange reasons, I don't know the hell you seen so many 20 fps drops in the video, honestly.Impressive Xbox One port. From what I've seen, its framerate always seem to be higher than PS4's even when both versions dip. They really need to fix PS4 framerate. 20fps is just too low.
![]()
Reminds me of PS4 gamers desperately convincing themselves that there is a huge difference between X1 and PS4 versions. The cycle continues.![]()
This sounds very interesting. So under similar conditions, the frame rate goes back to 30FPS after restarting?I mentioned this before but sometimes reloading a save can fix the big framedrops on PS4. There's still hiccups here and there but one point during a mission with fire, a storm, and tons of NPCs the framerate was down to low 20s. Died and on the replay it was back up to 30. Hopefully they can make that the standard.
And as had been said thousand of upon thousands of times, YOU DON'T NEED TOP OF THE LINE PC HARDWARE TO GET BETTER QUALITY THAN CONSOLES.
This was pointed out pretty clearly in the very same article linked in the thread. XD
So you only can see one side of the coin?
Great comparison from DF, as always it was pretty obvious the PC version would be the best, but can we can stop shitting on the current gen consoles with various comments like "underpowered", "weak", "sub par" etc etc, when they clearly aren't to most people who own them.
Being able to run a game as vast as The Witcher 3, and this is prior to any patch to further improve on it, is great for the fact consoles are going for at least £299, and it's hitting medium - high settings, not bad at all.
We all know why Sony & MS didn't go power hungry with the consoles.
If you want to put consoles down to make yourself feel better go ahead, but the majority of us are just enjoying the The Witcher 3.
Don't worry, I don't think the consoles are going to get their feelings hurt.