A Link to the Past
Banned
So wait, is this basically Mass Effect 4?
No it's a new story with new charactersSo wait, is this basically Mass Effect 4?
I mean... It is the fourth game in the Mass Effect universe so technically? But it takes place in another galaxy, and you don't play as Shepard, and we don't really know "when" the game starts.So wait, is this basically Mass Effect 4?
Just as long as the content is not like DAI'ish
Called it a long time ago.
It starts with Shepard giving farewell to the people of the ARK so it definitely takes place after ME3 which makes it kinda a sequel.
Totally expected. This year was freaking packed anyway. I look forward to finally seeing it at E3. Bring it on!
Right, totally forgot about that. But around that time. They have kept this under wraps for long enough. I need that full gameplay reveal!It probably won't be at E3 but the new EA event "EA Play" right before E3 !
I'm still not totally convinced they wouldn't swap Titanfall 2 and ME:A for the holiday release, as the latter just looks like a way better selling candidate (don't think it's even debatable?).
Yea but I'd bet good money that it gets pushed back even further, considering the stage the marketing cycle is at. We'll know at E3 just where it is I guess.
Question is, why is E3 calling Q1 2017 Q4? How does that even work.
So ME 1-3 remaster release July/Aug. and ME:A March '17.
The gap gives me more time to finish FFXV.
Question is, why is E3 calling Q1 2017 Q4? How does that even work.
Not happening.
Every single statement EA has given on the subject has been that they don't do remasters. People will inside knowledge have repeatedly said they aren't doing it.
They have literally done everything short of screaming "WE ARE NOT REMASTERING MASS EFFECT" at this point.
However, I get the sense that no matter how clear they are in their statements, unless they actually say those exact words people will continue to believe that they're doing it. Hell, even if they did, I'm willing to bet some would find some way to twist those words such that they believe they're still doing it.
Doesn't matter that it doesn't make sense to you or others. For whatever reason EA has just taken an anti-remaster stance this generation.
, and we don't really know "when" the game starts.
Not happening.
Every single statement EA has given on the subject has been that they don't do remasters. People with inside knowledge have repeatedly said they aren't doing it.
Doesn't matter that it doesn't make sense to you or others. For whatever reason EA has just taken an anti-remaster stance this generation.
Given they still have six Fall 2016 games to unveil first, you will probably have to wait until E3.I was hoping it would hit this year but Q1 isn't unexpected.
I just want to see the gamr at this point. Just a single screenshot or something.
Oh don't worry, based on the the thus far accurate survey leak, I'm sure there will be 80 hours of content.
Hundreds of star systems
Loot collection
Item crafting
Bases to raid
Colony building + real time strike team metagame layer
There's gonna be so much content you'll wish it would stop.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1031314&Woah nice - where did this info come from? you have a link?
They could be added to the community OP, but that's up to shinobi.http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1031314&
I think having megathread of all info/leaks we got so far would be helpful.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1031314&
I think having megathread of all info/leaks we got so far would be helpful.
Does DICE really need to release BF5 this year, or can they just let Titanfall 2 have the limelight?Then does that mean Titanfall 2 and Battlefield 5 are both Fall 2016 games? Only thing that seems weird.
Does DICE really need to release BF5 this year, or can they just let Titanfall 2 have the limelight?