Dreamgazer
Member
Ponn01 said:No, he has a valid point. I'm buying Record of Agarest War instead.
boobies
Spend your money on Resonance of Fate instead!
different color panties
Ponn01 said:No, he has a valid point. I'm buying Record of Agarest War instead.
boobies
fernoca said:Does that mean they also ported the US-PS3 version..from the Xbox 360 version?! :O!!!!!
SE sucks. Sorry to disappoint everyone.ExtraKr1spy said:But you would expect a huge company like SE to put as much effort on their flagship franchise on both platforms.
That can't be!! You liar!Kagari said:The game just has low-res ground textures in general.
fernoca said:Does that mean they also ported the US-PS3 version..from the Xbox 360 version?! :O!!!!!
duckroll said:ALL HAIL LORD NOMURA-SAMA!
Kagari said:Now if only he would actually show the public his game...
Eternal Sleeper said:Sometimes I wish SE has an official forum.
Just so I can troll their business decisions this gen to no end.
That and...MS....stop wasting your money on stupid exclusives...or multiplat...blahhhhh
duckroll said:He did. It's already out. I've played over 80 hours of it!
Peff said:They don't really look that different...
DMPrince said:what happened to hope's arm in the 360 shot? :lol 360 couldn't render it?
Metalic Sand said:OMG :lol Wth is going on with his arm.
Septimus said:Now that you stacked them like that, the PS3 version does look quite a bit crisper.
DMPrince said:what happened to hope's arm in the 360 shot? :lol 360 couldn't render it?
I was under the impression R&C ran at just under 720p, like a vertical resolution of 702 (and not upscaled, but with bars).marathonfool said:They do when you have a nice big HD screen. Lower resolution really sticks out to me. Rachet and Clank was hard to look at.
h3ro said:Also, it appears that he fights with a giant toothbrush on the PS3 version.
PS3 has better dental hygiene: Confirmed.
MvmntInGrn said:I was under the impression R&C ran at just under 720p, like a vertical resolution of 702 (and not upscaled, but with bars).
Peff said:http://www.meristation.com/EPORTAL_IMGS/GENERAL/juegos/Xbox360-Rol/23/IMG2-cw4b7d43c0b0400/final_fantasy_xiii_360_028.jpg[img]
[img]http://www.meristation.com/EPORTAL_IMGS/GENERAL/juegos/PlayStation3-Rol/1f/IMG2-cw4b7d450edb58d/final_fantasy_xiii_ps3_05.jpg[img]
They don't really look that different...[/QUOTE]
Actually in this comparison the resolution difference is pretty obvious.
Personally I can't wait to see how DigitalFoundry will spin this in the 360's favor.
Peff said:Some shoots really look off on the 360 though
images
The enemies and ground look the same but the characters seem to have different lightning. Oh, well.
desu said:Those new 360 screens look far better than the ones from SE. Still looks a bit off on 360.
Dedication Through Light said:Hope's hair looks more detailed on the PS3 one then that X360 one. Though other than, it seems the difference would only be noticed on an up close and personal level. The images still seem to indicate that ground textures are rather bland or stick out weirdly in relation to the character models, imo.
On another note, it seems kind of goofy to have on that menu screen Hope looking extremely serious/sad, while the girl is smiling like its her best day on Earth.
Misterinenja said:Is this the first multiplat game looking worse on 360?
Misterinenja said:Is this the first multiplat game looking worse on 360?
Misterinenja said:Is this the first multiplat game looking worse on 360?
Misterinenja said:Is this the first multiplat game looking worse on 360?
Misterinenja said:Is this the first multiplat game looking worse on 360?
nskinnear said:Just got back from pre-ordering this game at GameStop.
I guess the pre-order "bonus" is supposed to make me want to buy the full guide.
Lol.
electroshockwave said:There's been a few games like Mirror's Edge and Burnout Paradise where I think the PS3 has got the edge. And there's some late releases like Red Alert 3 and Sigma 2 have improved graphics on the PS3.
Synless said:Wow, I didn't think this would have been a poor port after all that "they are identical" talk. Guess 360 owners lose out this time after all.
Well, all they've said about it is that they (first) chose how many discs (i.e. 3), then started the porting. So they worked with the 3 discs size/limitation in mind. They could've done 4..Khrno said:It's a shame that SE had to resort to this to fit the game in just 3 discs. Although the question is, did they really do it to not go over 3 discs, or was it too difficult for them to actually do a decent porting job and gave the 3 discs reason as an excuse?