Support NeoGAF

[Bernoulli]

 

[squarealex]

Console settings is Medium 1080p? And this game need DLSS3/FSR3 for fake framerate ? Oh boy....

 

[Bernoulli]

Console settings is Medium 1080p? And this game need DLSS3/FSR3 for fake framerate ? Oh boy....

Medium Low 900p upscale

 

[Gaiff]

Console settings is Medium 1080p? And this game need DLSS3/FSR3 for fake framerate ? Oh boy....

What the fuck are you talking about?

 

[Magic Carpet]

Thats about 10 GB per hour of gameplay.

 

[FalconPunch]

Thats about 10 GB per hour of gameplay.

I'd be shocked if the game takes more than 4-5 hours to beat.

 

[adamsapple]

Medium Low 900p upscale

Source?

 

[Jaybe]

Can you really call it 1080p when a quarter of the screen is dedicated to black bars for that cinematic effect?

 

[Bernoulli]

Source?

Xbox's Hellblade 2 Is 'On Another Level' Says Digital Foundry, Despite Series S Concerns

The DF team dives into some preview footage

www.purexbox.com

 

[ResilientBanana]

Console settings is Medium 1080p? And this game need DLSS3/FSR3 for fake framerate ? Oh boy....

The consoles aren't PC's and don't act like such.

 

[VitoNotVito]

What the fuck are you talking about?

PS5 equivalent is RX5700, Series X is probably closer to RX5700XT
So what is described as "medium" at 1080p settings is equivalent to console hardware...

 

[Topher]

The consoles aren't PC's and don't act like such.

Xbox uses FSR 3, x86, RDNA, etc.......there's quite a bit in common with PCs.

 

[rodrigolfp]

Can you really call it 1080p when a quarter of the screen is dedicated to black bars for that cinematic effect?

They are already predicting people removing the black bars with teaks/mods.

 

[squarealex]

The consoles aren't PC's and don't act like such.

Except Xbox Series S. Medium Stuff (Ryzen 3th gen / 2070) is almost PS5 / Xbox Series X

We don't know if this settings run at 60fps or 30fps. And the little disclaimer "Higher Framerate can be achieved" that's tell me, that's need DLSS Frame Generator or FSR3 Frame generator to reach 60fps.

 

[Topher]

PS5 equivalent is RX5700, Series X is probably closer to RX5700XT
So what is described as "medium" at 1080p settings is equivalent to console hardware...

5700/XT are RDNA 1.0. Consoles are RDNA 2.0. Probably more in line with 6700/XT

 

[T4keD0wN]

Would be nice to know if its for 60 fps or 30.

Thats about 10 GB per hour of gameplay.

At least theres finally an upside to me sucking at games, itll be 5gb per hour for me.

 

[twilo99]

Xbox uses FSR 3, x86, RDNA, etc.......there's quite a bit in common with PCs.

“Secret sauce”

 

[Heisenberg007]

Thats about 10 GB per hour of gameplay.

 

[Topher]

“Secret sauce”

Folks really need to stop believing in those fairy tales. Xbox in particular is about as close to a PC as a console has ever been.

 

[shamoomoo]

PS5 equivalent is RX5700, Series X is probably closer to RX5700XT
So what is described as "medium" at 1080p settings is equivalent to console hardware...

No,the PS5 fill-rates are higher than both at stock frequency. The Series X is closer to both in terms of ROPs fill-rate and faster at texturing plus the Series X has more memory bandwidth.

 

[DenchDeckard]

Cant wait for this game now. Hope its as good as the first. Ive been binging big JRPGs and looking forward to a nice short arty pallet cleanser.

 

[analog_future]

Can't wait for this on my PC. Looks to set a new bar in visual fidelity.

 

[Jaybe]

Thats about 10 GB per hour of gameplay runtime

Fixed

 

[Draugoth]

The relative low specs casn be explained as this being a very linear game

 

[Gaiff]

Arc 770 = RTX 3080

 

[LordBritish]

my 4080 12gb laptop will be scorching ready

 

[Mr Moose]

A770 is like a 3080?

 

[willothedog]

Ultra setting it is

 

[clarky]

Looking forward to this one a far bit. Should be a decent ride for a few hours.

 

[R3TRODYCE]

I expected more tbh.

Very high it is.

 

[Buggy Loop]

A770 is like a 3080?

 

[Grildon Tundy]

Arc 770 vs 3080:

UserBenchmark: Intel Arc A770 vs Nvidia RTX 3080

 

[winjer]

Arc 770 vs 3080:

UserBenchmark: Intel Arc A770 vs Nvidia RTX 3080

Userbenchmark. Seriously man.

 

[panda-zebra]

Can you really call it 1080p when a quarter of the screen is dedicated to black bars for that cinematic effect?

Filmic experience

 

[Grildon Tundy]

Userbenchmark. Seriously man.

Educate me.

 

[winjer]

Educate me.

That is the worst site or anything related to hardware, in the whole world.

 

[Grildon Tundy]

That is the worst site or anything related to hardware, in the whole world.

Sure, but why?

 

[M1987]

So does the bit at the bottom mean these are the specs with framegen turned on? if it is I'm not playing this shit

 

[winjer]

Sure, but why?

They fabricate results.
In every tech forum, you post anything from userbenchmark, and people will immediately call you out.

 

[Grildon Tundy]

They fabricate results.
In every tech forum, you post anything from userbenchmark, and people will immediately call you out.

I was looking for more detail and found this:

• Biased component rating: UserBenchmark has been accused of having a biased rating system, favoring certain CPU and GPU manufacturers over others. This can lead to inaccurate and misleading information for users.
• Inaccurate benchmarking: The website’s benchmarking method has been criticized for being flawed, with some users reporting that it doesn’t accurately represent real-world performance.
• User-submitted data: UserBenchmark relies on user-submitted data, which can be problematic. This can lead to inflated scores due to users trying to game the system by submitting high scores, and also, it can be difficult to ensure the accuracy of the data.
• Lack of transparency: The website’s methodology and scoring system are not transparent, making it difficult for users to understand how their results are calculated and what they mean.
• Inconsistent scoring: Some users have reported that the website’s scoring system is inconsistent, with different results for the same hardware.
• Negative assessments of certain processors: UserBenchmark has been criticized for giving negative assessments to certain processors, such as octa-core processors, despite them being capable of delivering better performance.
• Inaccurate information: Some users have reported receiving inaccurate information from the website, such as incorrect benchmark scores or misleading reviews.
• Lack of credibility: UserBenchmark has been criticized for lacking credibility, with some users questioning the website’s expertise and objectivity.
• Inability to provide a comprehensive picture: The website’s benchmarking method is limited, and it may not provide a comprehensive picture of a hardware’s performance, making it difficult for users to make informed decisions.

Interesting. Still seems like a decent enough site for a gut-check, but I guess I won't be relying on them when making purchases in the future.

 

[winjer]

I was looking for more detail and found this:

Interesting. Still seems like a decent enough site for a gut-check, but I guess I won't be relying on them when making purchases in the future.

Please don't use uberbenchmark. It's a source of misinformation.
There are so many reliable sources for hardware news and benchmarks. For example:
Techpowerup
Techspot
gamernexus
chipsandcheese
anandtech
guru3d
igorslab

And so many more.
Even Linus is much better than userbenchmark.

 

[ResilientBanana]

Xbox uses FSR 3, x86, RDNA, etc.......there's quite a bit in common with PCs.

on paper, but they have their own architectures, SDK's and so on. Similar, but not same..

 

[Agent_4Seven]

12GB VRAM @ 4K Very High settings and it requires 16 or 20GB GPUs? Who are you trying to fool here, Ninja Theory? And no target FPS again?

If I had to guess based on what they're trying to do visually, the game in terms of performance will be somewhat similar to Alan Wake 2 before many performance patches were released.

 

[Topher]

on paper, but they have their own architectures, SDK's and so on. Similar, but not same..

The architecture is RDNA 2.0 although I believe Xbox may have some custom elements, but largely the same. Xbox uses the same SDK as PC. Microsoft unified the dev kits with GDK. Likely there are some Xbox specific functions and whatnot though.

Probably the biggest difference would be with the underlying operating system as it is still Windows based, but with changes to allow stuff like Quick Resume. I'm not certain of that though.

 

[yamaci17]

reasonable for a nextgen game, i will probably do 1440p dlss quality 40 fps lock on my 3070

 

[HeWhoWalks]

My PC will blitz right through it!

 

[Mister Wolf]

Thankfully no black bars on PC.

 

[ResilientBanana]

Probably the biggest difference would be with the underlying operating system as it is still Windows based, but with changes to allow stuff like Quick Resume. I'm not certain of that though.

not to mention the plethora of different configurations that come with pc's. None are the same.

 

[Black_Stride]

All over my body!

How much Intel Optimization did they do cuz the A580 and A770 seem to be carrying a shit ton of weight.
I know native XeSS is fast but is it really that fast?

I really do need to buy an A770 or B770 if they announce them soon.

 

[Arsic]

This on GeForce? Had amazing results with AW2 max settings on there.

May be the way for this one if it’s actually worth a monthly sub to try.