It depends on screen size, try to see difference between 1080p and 4k at 2meters on 28 inch monitor and i guarantee u wont see any even with 20/20 eyesight- got 32inch 4k hdr monitor here and to fully apreciate it i sit around 0,5m from the screen, at 2m difference between full hd and 4k is basically non existant.Who are the blind cunts that cannot tell the difference between 1080p and 4K at 2m ???
You clearly haven't seen 1080p fifa on a 75" 4k tv. It looks fuc**** TERRIBLE!I’m not saying I don’t notice between resolutions, I just don’t really care.
65“ which i use combined with 1.31m away is fucking garbage. These are strange optimal viewing distances…Don't Be Fooled. 8K TVs Are A Waste Of Money For Most Viewers
What's on the screen and what your eyes can see are two different things.www.forbes.com
There is no reason to move into 8k for the next decade or so.
65“ which i use combined with 1.31m away is fucking garbage. These are strange optimal viewing distances…
That's because your 4K screen is better than your HD one. And unless your 4K panel is among the few you can literally count on one hand, rest assured a 1080p KRP-500M is night and day compared to your 4K one.. in favor of the 1080p.I have a 50 inch with a chair and head position exactly 6 foot from my screen. The difference between that and a 1080p panel us night and day.
You're arguing science and mathematics mate. You think those charts are made by GAF users?Don't be so daft.
That's because your 4K screen is better than your HD one. And unless your 4K panel is among the few you can literally count on one hand, rest assured a 1080p KRP-500M is night and day compared to your 4K one.. in favor of the 1080p.
You're arguing science and mathematics mate. You think those charts are made by GAF users?
I don't give a shit what the science of this random chart say, when you turn on your new TV and say "woo that looks a lot better than my old 1080p" then you can rest assured that you can trust in your eyes rather than a rickerty old chart off the internet and I'm pretty sure my Samsung Q90 has a better picture than some old plasma from eons ago.
"looks a lot better" isn't just about resolution, it's also about contrast, motion resolution and much more factors that come into play.
This topic is about resolution, not image-quality in its entirety.
Go and run a 4K tech demo on a 1080p monitor then go and run it on a 4k panel. Is this the cataracts society ?
Depends on size/distance. I feel like 4K is the "eye limit" for screens under 40 inch. After that, you wouldn't see a difference unless you were too close to examine the pixels.
Personally i don't care about resolution anymore. I wish developers and manufacturers cared more about motion instead of the quality of still images. 120hz TVs and VRR being pushed is a step to the right direction but motion blur is still a huge issue that has been ignored completely since CRTs were abandoned.
Don't Be Fooled. 8K TVs Are A Waste Of Money For Most Viewers
What's on the screen and what your eyes can see are two different things.www.forbes.com
There is no reason to move into 8k for the next decade or so.
Too difficult, have some shiny pixels instead!They should focus on AI upscalers.
Well it depends on the size of the screen and your viewing distance.Yes, 4k is a very good resolution, that is quite close to make pixels invisible. Sure, they could push it till 8k, and pixels would finally be totally invisible (so there would be no need to push resolution any further), but since consoles are closed and limited in specs, I feel that keeping resolution at 4k and using the increased horsepower to improve rendering quality would be the best choice. That would make a huge jump in quality. And since next gen will have many more features that will improve efficiency (like AI rendering, DLSS like tech, and so on...), the jump can be even greater.
Resolution increase has anyway to come to a stop once pixel dimension will fall below perception threshold.
Of course, but even from close distance, if the image is clean, it's very good. I would not trade any advancement in rendering for additional resolution, past 4k.Well it depends on the size of the screen and your viewing distance.
I am willing to pay money for a powerful console that can display native HD resolutions, not checkerboard bullshit.
Well my TV is 43” Samsung 4K TV and the room I play my games is not big so I relatively sit close to my TV when playing games.But can you share your TV size and viewing distance? If it's not a problem for you, I'm sorry if it sounds rude. It's only that, for me, I was feeling 2k was totally enough until I get a bigger TV. So I think even if you think you don't care it's maybe because you doesn't need to care about something that it's not really noticeable.
For example, in my TV my minimum would be 4K, but playing in PC in my monitor, 1440p is more than enough. So, it's not a problem about an absolute resolution but about relative size and viewing distance.