Why is he reviewing this movie now?
Because it's a mess?
Why is he reviewing this movie now?
In my opinion, that's like saying the Star Wars Holiday Special is still better than the Prequels. It simply is not true.
It was unexpected, but he was the reason they didn't make another.Didn't expect the Bill Murray hate.
Oh joy. More Ghostbusters Discourse.
I hate the internet.
This was pretty good. They should stick to bringing this character out for bad movies because movies they enjoy don't work with the format. When they can't come up with stuff to critique you end up with that awful meandering TFA review or just a blegh video that doesn't cover much beyond what every other youtube review already did months ago.
Didn't expect the Bill Murray hate.
Why is he reviewing this movie now?
This was pretty good. They should stick to bringing this character out for bad movies because movies they enjoy don't work with the format. When they can't come up with stuff to critique you end up with that awful meandering TFA review or just a blegh video that doesn't cover much beyond what every other youtube review already did months ago.
I had never seen the Dunkin Donuts scene in Jack and Jill. JEEZ
Review was quite informative but I wish it had more Plinkett dark humor like his older reviews. Thats the reason I watch the reviews.
Anyone who thinks rlm is alt right is totally on the money. Only such disgusting mras could suggest one of the things that could have given gb16 some heart was to fully embrace the lesbian ghostbuster and given her a female love interest to rescue at the end of the film. I'm gonna unsub from their channel, stop supporting them on patreon, unfollow them on twitter, and drink gallons of dan ackyrod's crystal skull vodka mixed with ecto cooler so forget I ever heard of them.
I had never seen the Dunkin Donuts scene in Jack and Jill. JEEZ
I had never seen the Dunkin Donuts scene in Jack and Jill. JEEZ
Oh joy. Someone who didn't watch the video!
Wasn't he strongarmed into this somehow?
I don't care about internet nerds arguing with each other over Ghostbusters (2016) because the discussion field is so incredibly toxic and facepalm inducing that I really just don't appreciate someone stoking the fires more.
@bolded: You sound like you're projecting hardcore and very upset over RLM getting criticized . Not to mention you're arguing in intellectually dishonest manners....all whilst bringing up something that has literally nothing to do with the review since they avoided downplaying the sexism entirely. I'd suggest sticking to the community thread where you can claim we all hate comedy/are saying you're all alt-righters or whatever it is that thread does. Talk about the review, dude.
@bolded: You sound like you're projecting hardcore and very upset over RLM getting criticized . Not to mention you're arguing in intellectually dishonest manners....all whilst bringing up something that has literally nothing to do with the review since they avoided downplaying the sexism entirely. I'd suggest sticking to the community thread where you can claim we all hate comedy/are saying you're all alt-righters or whatever it is that thread does. Talk about the review, dude.
You cared enough to drive by shitpost, though 🤔I don't care about internet nerds arguing with each other over Ghostbusters (2016) because the discussion field is so incredibly toxic and facepalm inducing that I really just don't appreciate someone stoking the fires more.
It's a lot more constructive that I'd thought it would be; I was bracing for "This movie cast women, so it sucked", but the review is pretty insightful in how the material and the director are at odds with one another.
I'm left with the feeling that Mike thought there would be more to make fun of and dissect, but it sounds like the film is just a run-of-the-mill bad and not really worthy of an hour long discussion.
I don't care about internet nerds arguing with each other over Ghostbusters (2016) because the discussion field is so incredibly toxic and facepalm inducing that I really just don't appreciate someone stoking the fires more.
Then why the hell did you post in this thread.I don't care about internet nerds arguing with each other over Ghostbusters (2016) because the discussion field is so incredibly toxic and facepalm inducing that I really just don't appreciate someone stoking the fires more.
They praise Bridesmaids.Only 15 mins in and this is already much better than their TFA review, miles better even.
I agree that Bridesmaids is bad, Spy is above average, and never saw Freaks & Geeks.
I don't care about internet nerds arguing with each other over Ghostbusters (2016) because the discussion field is so incredibly toxic and facepalm inducing that I really just don't appreciate someone stoking the fires more.
Spy is one of the best comedies in years, I was shocked how hard I laughed. And bridesmaids is also great, but mainly for it's script.Only 15 mins in and this is already much better than their TFA review, miles better even.
I agree that Bridesmaids is bad, Spy is above average, and never saw Freaks & Geeks.
It's a lot more constructive that I'd thought it would be; I was bracing for "This movie cast women, so it sucked", but the review is pretty insightful in how the material and the director are at odds with one another.
I edited my post, it was hyperbolic and went too far.
Why is he reviewing this movie now?
Why did he review The Phantom Menace in 2009? Is there an inappropriate time to review a film?
Finished it and....well, at least it had a few insightful bits of commentary and didn't downplay the sexism??? Didn't really acknowledge it but the review at least seemed fair and focused solely on the content of the film itself and how it was influenced in various ways. Kinda a shock, tbh.
Yes. The Sony leaks basically revealed that they were going to sue him if he didn't allow them to make one and show up for it.
Blaming Murray for cockblocking GB3 while Ramis was still alive to write it is one thing and somewhat accurate, but after he passed and Sony says 'hey let's do another Pixels' it's hard not to think that Murray was right, at least after Ramis passed away.
You cared enough to drive by shitpost, though 🤔