Cc23830
Member
Even watching streamers alone isn't the same if you haven't been in that last circle yourself.
This is the answer to every pubg question. The adrenaline, heart thumping terror/excitement. Its quite unique.
Even watching streamers alone isn't the same if you haven't been in that last circle yourself.
I've seen a bunch of videos and looks boring as hell. Is it that good if you're actually playing the game?
People call out PUBG because it's the Goat Simulator of shooters - janky, poor production values yet it's a massive memish phenomenon.
People call out PUBG because it's the Goat Simulator of shooters - janky, poor production values yet it's a massive memish phenomenon. I'm fine with people enjoying it (for whatever reason), tho not everyone is going to be enamoured with what's being served up.
I must be an old timer gaffer, still don't get the appeal of this game.
Something about its mechanics lacking finesse. The traversal looks janky, there is plenty of downtime and the shooting vs TTK seems bad.
I guess its the social aspects, unlike other co-op, this has more breathing space. Is it most popular in usa?
I can see a clone by a big dev with a big budget, cleaning up those rough areas.
People call out PUBG because it's the Goat Simulator of shooters - janky, poor production values yet it's a massive memish phenomenon. I'm fine with people enjoying it (for whatever reason), tho not everyone is going to be enamoured with what's being served up.
Personally, when I first heard about it I thought it was exactly that -- the next in the line of "streaming success stories" that Haunted outlined.
Do you think it's possible it sort of dies a bit because...of school?
How many bought Goat Simulator? As you suggest, people may think it's a good game - but the overwhelming success has to be partly attributed to hype. Fear of missing out on being part of the cultural phenomenon drives PUBG. "I was logged on when it went 1 mil concurrent!" From the time I've spent with it, the game has merit, but the success is disproportionate to the quality of the product. You're welcome to feel differently.This makes my head hurt. Do you honestly think 9 million people bought a $30 game that has never been on sale because it's a "memish phenomenon"? Maybe they just think it's genuinely a good game?
Around 3 million on steam apparently. So PUBG is well past thatHow many bought Goat Simulator? As you suggest, people may think it's a good game - but the overwhelming success has to be partly attributed to hype. Fear of missing out on being part of the cultural phenomenon drives PUBG. "I was logged on when it went 1 mil concurrent!" From the time I've spent with it, the game has merit, but the success is disproportionate to the quality of the product. You're welcome to feel differently.
You'll have to point out my entitlement, as you've lost me on that one. As for belittling people who play early access games - no, I'm pointing out that for some of us the poor production values kill our interest in the title. More than happy for people like yourself to enjoy whatever floats your boat.God this just reeks of entitlement and belittling of anyone who would "sully" themselves to play an early access shooter. I don't see how you can honestly sit there and say 9+ million people bought a game cuz they wanted to facilitate a meme. Grow up.
How many bought Goat Simulator? As you suggest, people may think it's a good game - but the overwhelming success has to be partly attributed to hype. Fear of missing out on being part of the cultural phenomenon drives PUBG. "I was logged on when it went 1 mil concurrent!" From the time I've spent with it, the game has merit, but the success is disproportionate to the quality of the product. You're welcome to feel differently.
but the overwhelming success has to be partly attributed to hype
How many bought Goat Simulator? As you suggest, people may think it's a good game - but the overwhelming success has to be partly attributed to hype. Fear of missing out on being part of the cultural phenomenon drives PUBG. "I was logged on when it went 1 mil concurrent!" From the time I've spent with it, the game has merit, but the success is disproportionate to the quality of the product. You're welcome to feel differently.
People call out PUBG because it's the Goat Simulator of shooters - janky, poor production values yet it's a massive memish phenomenon. I'm fine with people enjoying it (for whatever reason), tho not everyone is going to be enamoured with what's being served up.
Out of curiosity what's the highest ever number of concurrent players in a game on Steam?
Literally the same graph as PUBG God learn to readImplying that something must be fit certain criteria of 'quality' to warrant it's success is ridiculous. People don't won't let lacking production values or a bit of jank get in the way if they're having fun.
Games simply do not sustain anywhere close to this level of growth or player base mostly on hype. They certainly don't play just to be say 'I was online when it hit 1 million concurrent', the vast majority of people playing it have no idea how many people are concurrently playing the game. The game just nailed the core gameplay loop, and playing it with other people is significantly more rewarding (and naturally beneficial) than most other games - which adds to a genuinely natural network effect (accelerating and sustaining growth).
Also, Goat Simulator for context:
![]()
Could you possibly be anymore smug. JFC careful your monocle might fall out.You'll have to point out my entitlement, as you've lost me on that one. As for belittling people who play early access games - no, I'm pointing out that for some of us the poor production values kill our interest in the title. More than happy for people like yourself to enjoy whatever floats your boat.
Maybe i should give it a try while it's still a thing i guess..
How many bought Goat Simulator? As you suggest, people may think it's a good game - but the overwhelming success has to be partly attributed to hype. Fear of missing out on being part of the cultural phenomenon drives PUBG.
The thing I hate about PUBG is that it's not out on PS4 yet.The thing I hate about PUBG is that my friends refuse now to play anything else, trying to convince them to play some R6:Siege with me again with the release of the patch tomorrow is impossible.![]()
We can agree on that.I guess in your mind this is like a Destiny 1? Exept this is a much better game than Destiny 1.
How many bought Goat Simulator? As you suggest, people may think it's a good game - but the overwhelming success has to be partly attributed to hype.
Fear of missing out on being part of the cultural phenomenon drives PUBG. "I was logged on when it went 1 mil concurrent!" From the time I've spent with it, the game has merit, but the success is disproportionate to the quality of the product. You're welcome to feel differently.
How many bought Goat Simulator? As you suggest, people may think it's a good game - but the overwhelming success has to be partly attributed to hype. Fear of missing out on being part of the cultural phenomenon drives PUBG. "I was logged on when it went 1 mil concurrent!" From the time I've spent with it, the game has merit, but the success is disproportionate to the quality of the product. You're welcome to feel differently.
Except those games have/had thriving population numbers for years, though.
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds OT | The Worst Game in HistoryAll the hate it receives is quite fitting for its genre, considering that the Battle Royale manga's first chapter is called The Worst Game in History.![]()
Maybe i should give it a try while it's still a thing i guess..
Ark's population numbers are only slightly lower than H1Z1's and have been pretty steady since launchProbably only H1Z1. There was a thread not long ago here that talked about that game topping 7 million users, about half of whom are from China
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1427000
That said, it's concurrents aren't as high (100k)
http://steamcharts.com/app/433850#All
lol at calling Battlegrounds a "memish phenomenon"People call out PUBG because it's the Goat Simulator of shooters - janky, poor production values yet it's a massive memish phenomenon. I'm fine with people enjoying it (for whatever reason), tho not everyone is going to be enamoured with what's being served up.
Yeah, "old time" to me is manually configuring autoexec.bat and config.sys for each game to make sure it gets the amount of EMS and XMS memory it wantsYeah us "old timers" are used to only the smoothest experiences, like playing Doom MP over a BNC LAN on a bunch of 486s. No rough edges at all there.
Or hooking up a 38k modem to play Tribes 2, just absolutely the least janky thing imaginable, how can I be expected to put up with an inferior experience to that?
PC gaming has always been about the rough edges, the jank, the broken shit.
Sure someone like Blizzard will eventually take a genre and polish it until it shines, but without Team Fortress 2 there'd be no Overwatch. Without Team Fortress Classic there'd be no Team Fortress 2. Without Quake TF there'd be no Team Fortress Classic.
Be under no illusions: Quake TF was a fucking mess. But it was still incredible.
PUBG really doesn't feel like an early access game. Nor does it feel low budget.
Some of this talk is hurting my brain.
Yeah, "old time" to me is manually configuring autoexec.bat and config.sys for each game to make sure it gets the amount of EMS and XMS memory it wants
I don't associate "old-school" with "polished".
If it doesn't have a poor story, shitloads of boring cutscenes and voice acting then it's low budget eastern european jank.
yeah, I have the feeling that sometimes a game (!) cant just be about gameplay anymore... all that other stuff you just mentioned is just not important for this game... I would even say it would make it much much worse
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds OT | The Worst Game in History
Yeah us "old timers" are used to only the smoothest experiences, like playing Doom MP over a BNC LAN on a bunch of 486s. No rough edges at all there.
Or hooking up a 38k modem to play Tribes 2, just absolutely the least janky thing imaginable, how can I be expected to put up with an inferior experience to that?
PC gaming has always been about the rough edges, the jank, the broken shit.
Sure someone like Blizzard will eventually take a genre and polish it until it shines, but without Team Fortress 2 there'd be no Overwatch. Without Team Fortress Classic there'd be no Team Fortress 2. Without Quake TF there'd be no Team Fortress Classic.
Be under no illusions: Quake TF was a fucking mess. But it was still incredible.
I agree, I was just being sarcastic in my post in case that didn't come across. It really does feel like a lot of people who "don't get it" do so because it hasn't had a bloated marketing campaign, named voice actors and so on. This forum is very very console centric so when something like PUBG comes out and becomes incredibly popular you get old men yelling at clouds.
Why are some people so mad at this game's success? Console and/or Zelda fanboys mad that a multiplayer only PC exclusive (for now at least) is the most popular game of the year and will easily grab the GOTY award?
The salt, jesus.
Bluehole was the underdog, now people are rooting for the plucky EAs and Activisions to knock them down a peg, all in the span of 5 months.