MikeE21286
Member
Linus got 60 at high settings.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 reviews and benchmarks
- Thread starter dr_rus
- Start date
BoboBrazil
Member
Well it is double the price or more.
BoboBrazil
Member
Maybe an overclocked 1080ti with hbm2 assuming you mean maxed out settings. You can get it now or close to it by dropping settings with 1080.
Bony Manifesto
Member
Depends on the game.
thats fucking insane...........holy shit
The Jump is absolutely monsterous.....11 fps jump at 4k is big......those founders cards or whatever that allow massive overclocking will be interesting to see benchmarks with
It releases AMD from the imperative of implementing a better DX11 driver
PCGamer (MaximumPC)
http://www.pcgamer.com/gtx-1080-review/
http://www.pcgamer.com/gtx-1080-review/
LabouredSubterfuge
Member
IIRC 'high' is like medium settings on Crysis 3 because they used really stupid naming conventions on it.
Think the Anand one is 'very high' FWIW.
Lol guys, my bad. Wasn't really thinking about the conversion, too early, just saw 76 and 100 lol.
Yeah, the cooler sucks: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=203896335&postcount=189
I posted this earlier from cb.de, but it got ignored.
Schnozberry
Member
I'm pretty happy with my OC'd 980Ti. I can't imagine the 1080 dropping below $699 for a while and I'm sure the resale value on my 980ti just shit the bed so I guess I'll hold tight until 1080ti makes it into the wild.
Reference cooler is pretty awful by the looks of it as well. Hopefully EVGA and Gigabyte have better plans for it.
Reference cooler is pretty awful by the looks of it as well. Hopefully EVGA and Gigabyte have better plans for it.
dr_rus
Member
lightchris
Member
Yeah. That's not good for a new generation. Of course the high end models were never known for best value, but it's still disappointing imo.
KurtSloane
Banned
Ti should be at least 20-30℅ faster than the basic 1080, should hit 4k/60 quite easily.
digitalrelic
Banned
It'd probably get pretty close on the games that are out today.. But what about the games that are out 3 months from now? 6 months from now? 6 months AFTER the 1080 Ti is released?
The answer to your question is no. Games released around the same time or after the 1080 Ti are not likely to hold 4k/60fps at max settings. A card capable of pulling that off with modern games of it's time is likely years and years (and years) away.
Totally disappointing
I'm passing on the reference edition
Partners coolers will be both better and cheaper
ScepticMatt
Member
The only thing that suck are the price and cooler of the reference cards.
789 Euro lol
789 Euro lol
Probably what I will end up doing, just really blows ass that nvidia pulled this founders shit. Been waiting all year for this release, now I have to wait extra time for this founders crap to play out.
I do think that if you're primarily a 1080p/60 gamer you'll be able to hang tough on a 970 or 980 for a while longer, albeit not at max settings. The current gen consoles should help keep lower settings lower enough for the older cards for another 2 years, hopefully.
KurtSloane
Banned
Reference coolers always suck, that's why you get the an evga or a gigabyte etc.
My evga 980ti FTW has a quality cooler and hits a base boost of around 1.4, could probably get it to around 1.5 or abit more.
Wait on the aftermarket cooler.
Adry9
Member
At $699 same value as the 980 or 980Ti. The 1070 will probably be better value than the 970.
Good luck getting that amount of money for a 980, assuming you're in the US.
KurtSloane
Banned
It is not years and years away at all.
Confirms FE is nothing but an intentional money grab.
This should be in the OP as well but I bet it wont be.
digitalrelic
Banned
What makes you believe that?
Gemüsepizza
Member
Any SLI benchmarks yet?
Yup, despite the fact that the 1080 looks great, Nvidia is leaving a really bad taste in my mouth with this Founder's Edition bullshit. The cooler and power is clearly inadequate. The fact that they are also charging a $100 premium for these inadequacies is just fucked beyond belief.
Platinumstorm
Member
Sitting on a GTX 570. Starting to get that upgrade itch.
KurtSloane
Banned
What makes you believe otherwise?
The 1080 on reference is hitting 60 @ 4k with some games on high, an aftermarket with better cooling and a higher clock should be even better at hitting that point.
The Ti will hit it probably on almost all games for the next while, especially on high and maybe a few less on ultra.
If it comes with HBM2, higher clock and atleast 20-30℅ percent more than the 1080 then I can see it performing at 4k really well.
draughn101
Member
I thought Jaytwocentz said in one of his videos that he had a few cards. It was his post event wrap up video I believe.
It may actually never happen. At max settings that is.. and no one should expect that it should. Maybe if game development decided unilaterally to stagnate in the adoption of new graphics tech, but that's not the norm.
New games will come out and be more demanding on ultra. And the cycle continues on and on.
I don't have an interim card though and my CPU doesn't have onboard video. If I sell the Titan X now, my PC would be out of commission for a month while I wait for a reasonably priced 1080.
dr_rus
Member
The link to ComputerBase review is in the OP. As for cooler being bad or not that's up to you to decide based on the information provided. As I've said several times already, I think that the card is overpriced even on a non-FE position.
Crysis 2 was one with stupid names, but Crysis 3 has Low, Medium, High and Very High, same as in other Crytek's games.
To be honest I feel like the FE being priced at $700 gives validation for much higher prices on the premium AIB cards.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Gigabyte G1 (or equivalent) comes in at $700. If that ends up being the case, it dampens my enthusiasm a bit. A 25-30% over 980 Ti is more or less expected based on historical jumps, but we were paying $150-200 less for this type of improvement with the 580 -> 680. It makes sense though, without competition from AMD, NV has no real incentive to lower prices.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Gigabyte G1 (or equivalent) comes in at $700. If that ends up being the case, it dampens my enthusiasm a bit. A 25-30% over 980 Ti is more or less expected based on historical jumps, but we were paying $150-200 less for this type of improvement with the 580 -> 680. It makes sense though, without competition from AMD, NV has no real incentive to lower prices.
lightchris
Member
And that's not a good thing. A new generation is supposed to bring significantly more performance per dollar.
Maybe the new 16 nm process just doesn't allow for more (we'll see how AMD will do). In that case it wouldn't be Nvidia's fault, but it wouldn't be any less disappointing either.
longdi
Banned
Well, didnt 980Ti came 8 months after 980 and made the 980 very very bad value?