Globalisateur
Banned
So... does the XBO have ANY component advantages?
Yes, certainly. The GPU can theoretically process 6.7% percent more triangles per seconds.
So... does the XBO have ANY component advantages?
Both CPUs are ass. This is kind of a non-story, so I don't see much controversy.
Yep, one is a little bit less shit than expected
still better than the other way around obviously
But you know how people mock the 380percent wii u sales increase as lol 3.8x 0 is still 0
this is like that but with a smaller increment
Lol, no.
---
And actual results are quite strange, i7 result is quite low in comparison.
In his defense, he is a gaming_noob.Are you joking? "We can confirm that the XB1 is amazingly powerful."
What do you expect?
Incorrect.
Ryse.gif
*drops mic*
*hits foot*
*is disgraced*
They came and went, like farts in the wind.
I don't believe any of this. Can we get confirmation from Penello and Major Nelson?
Seems like the most straightforward explanation is that PS4 is also running at 1.75GHz and has one less CPU core reserved for the OS?
Wasn't the CPU the only thing the Bone excelled the PS4 hardware-wise? lol
Yes, you can get more out of the PS4's CPU than you can the Xbox's.
Wasn't the CPU the only thing the Bone excelled the PS4 hardware-wise? lol
Games are running more and more through the GPU these days. Everyone claiming that it's a mobile part is referring to a 4 core version. Both consoles have 8 cores. The CPU are sufficient for what needs to be done, nothing more. It's a big part of why PS4 is heavily customized for GPU compute functionality. You'll be able to do more both in compute and visuals with a heavier GPU these days than you will with a beefy CPU.
Because it's subject to change. They usually never disclose this kind of data.Why didn't Sony publish the clock speed yet?
I don't believe any of this. Can we get confirmation from Penello and Major Nelson?
Seems like the most straightforward explanation is that PS4 is also running at 1.75GHz and has one less CPU core reserved for the OS?
Next-gen CPUs are only 3x faster than modern cell phones? lololol
We have 2 cores for the OS from the Killzone Shadowfall pdf.
lol both cpus aren't good to begin with
Oh wow, didn't see this.Yes, you can get more out of the PS4's CPU than you can the Xbox's.
Yes but it's still pretty disingenuous to call the PS4/XBO CPUs mobile/netbook parts when they dramatically outperform those. Sure, the CPUs are unimpressive but they're not as underpowered as that would imply.Both consoles have 8 cores but the CPUs are based on Jaguar architecture, which is a low-power SoC designed for notebooks, tablets, etc.
We have 2 cores for the OS from the Killzone Shadowfall pdf.
Yes, certainly. The GPU can theoretically process 6.7% percent more triangles per seconds.
Yes, you can get more out of the PS4's CPU than you can the Xbox's.
I'm amazed some people are still so ignorant as to think clock speed is what makes a CPU.
Yes, certainly. The GPU can theoretically process 6.7% percent more triangles per seconds.
Yes but it's still pretty disingenuous to call the PS4/XBO CPUs mobile/netbook parts when they dramatically outperform those. Sure, the CPUs are unimpressive but they're not as underpowered as that would imply.
Yeah but that was a long time ago. It strikes me as very possible that they would have got CPU utilisation down to one core in the months since February, no?
And one's even less good, by a not-insignificant margin (PS4 is around 1/6th more powerful).
lol both cpus aren't good to begin with
Seems like the most straightforward explanation is that PS4 is also running at 1.75GHz and has one less CPU core reserved for the OS?
SHIT
JUST
GOT
REAL
I thought the excuse was incomplete development tools, similar to the PS3 at launch.It's just more and more clear, to me at least, that the xbone is less powerful that what it was meant to be on the paper. Nobody was expecting that difference in multi titles on launch. Games with unimpressive graphics are not even running in fullhd.. There is something off.
truth factYes, you can get more out of the PS4's CPU than you can the Xbox's.
If the bench is running only on one core, we can only conclude that the PS4 CPU is clocked higher.
Well, I'm not really implying that myself, it is more the argument that it can't be clocked at 2ghz because of the PS4's form factor. I'm not saying it is, it could be that it has an extra core in use, but considering it is based on a low-power CPU designed for mobile devices, it might be possible.
Cool. A slow mobile cpu is slightly faster than another slow mobile cpu.
SHIT
JUST
GOT
REAL
How the hell are they running 2GHz in a case so slim, I don't see it.
I'm amazed some people are still so ignorant as to think clock speed is what makes a CPU.
Yes but it's still pretty disingenuous to call the PS4/XBO CPUs mobile/netbook parts when they dramatically outperform those. Sure, the CPUs are unimpressive but they're not as underpowered as that would imply.
That was from February. It could have changed since then.
It doesn't say whether it's running on one core though.
It doesn't say whether it's running on one core though.
Interestingly while demonstrating texture generation speed, DXT compressed, using Substance Engine, for one CPU, it was found that the PlayStation 4 is able to generate 14MB/s of textures compared to 12MB/s for the Xbox One.
http://gamingbolt.com/substance-eng...4-mbs-12-mbs-respectively#zTQF8OHYgwCY1sqm.99
It doesn't say whether it's running on one core though.